| Literature DB >> 26528820 |
Xin Wang1, Jing Wang2, Hao Sun2, Shengli Xia3, Ran Duan4, Junrong Liang4, Yuchun Xiao4, Haiyan Qiu4, Guangliang Shan5, Huaiqi Jing4.
Abstract
In China, great differences in economy, social characteristics and hygiene exist between developing and developed regions. A comparative study of infectious diarrhea between two regions was needed. Three groups of diarrheal patients were collected: children ≤5 year-olds from Beijing (developed region) and Henan Province (developing region), and adults over 18 year-olds from Beijing. A questionnaire was used to survey and feces samples were examined for 16 enteropathogens. We enrolled 1422 children and 1047 adults from developed region and 755 children from developing region. Virus positive rates were 32.98% for children and 23.67% for adults in developed region. The most prevalent pathogen for children was rotavirus whereas for adults was norovirus. Bacterial isolation rates were 13.92% for children from developed region, while 29.14% for children from the developing regions. For the greatest difference, Shigella accounted for 50.79% and was the dominant pathogen in the developing region, whereas in the developed region it was only 1.45%. There was no significant relationship between the local levels of development with diarrheogenic Escherichia coli (DEC) categories. But it was seen the notable differences between the population with different age: enteropathogenic E.coli (EPEC) and enteroaggregative E.coli (EAggEC) were the primary classes of DEC in children from both regions, whereas it was enterotoxigenic E.coli (ETEC) in adults. The symptoms of Shigella and Salmonella infection, such as bloody stools, white blood cells (WBC) and red blood cells (RBC) positivity and fever were similar in children, which may lead to the misidentification. Yersinia enterocolitica and shiga toxin-producing E.coli (STEC) infections were firstly reported in Beijing. There was a large difference in etiology of bacterial diarrhea between children in developing and developed regions of China.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26528820 PMCID: PMC4631449 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142136
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographic and clinical symptoms of cases.
| Characteristics | No. of enrolled cases (proportion %) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Children in developed region | Children in developing region | Adults in developed region | |||
| Gender | Male | 841(59.14) | 504(66.75) | 503(48.04) | |
| Female | 581(40.86) | 251(33.25) | 544(51.96) | ||
| Age(years) | 0- | 589(41.42) | 220(29.14) | 18- | 117(11.17) |
| 1- | 494(34.74) | 312(41.32) | 25- | 409(39.06) | |
| 2- | 151(10.62) | 136(18.01) | 35- | 140(13.37) | |
| 3- | 95(6.68) | 48(6.36) | 45- | 131(12.51) | |
| 4- | 53(3.73) | 27(3.58) | 55- | 115(10.98) | |
| 5- | 40(2.81) | 12(1.59) | 65- | 135(12.89) | |
| Season | Spring(Mar-May) | 254(17.86) | 87(11.52) | 290(27.70) | |
| Summer(Jun-Aug) | 571(40.15) | 297(39.34) | 491(46.89) | ||
| Autumn(Sep-Nov) | 420(29.54) | 321(42.52) | 266(25.41) | ||
| Winter(Dec-Feb) | 177(12.45) | 50(6.62) | - | ||
| Clinical Symptoms | Diarrhea frequency (times/day Mean±SD) | 4.35±1.72 | 6.15±2.15 | 5.69±2.23 | |
| Fever(>37.2℃) | 130(9.14) | 195(25.83) | 13(1.24) | ||
| Temperature(℃) | 38.46±0.62 | 38.33±0.68 | 38.55±0.54 | ||
| Vomit | 156(10.97) | 193(25.56) | 279(26.65) | ||
| Fecal property | Watery | 883(58.58) | 156(20.66) | 633(60.46) | |
| Mucus | 29(2.04) | 136(18.01) | 26(2.48) | ||
| Bloody | 13(0.91) | 356(47.15) | 5(0.48) | ||
| Loose | 497(34.95) | 107(14.17) | 383(36.58) | ||
| Stool Routine | WBC- | 929(65.33) | - | 492(46.99) | |
| WBC+ | 488(34.42) | - | 555(53.01) | ||
| RBC- | 1326(93.25) | - | 265(25.31) | ||
| RBC+ | 91(6.40) | - | 782(74.69) | ||
a: 1417 childhood cases were examined the stool routine inspection in developed region.
Fig 1Monthly number of enrolled, virus positive and bacteria isolated cases of children in the developed region.
Comparison of the positive rate of childhood cases in the developed region with adult cases in the developed region and childhood cases in the developing region.
| Pathogen | Children in Developed region (n = 1422) | Adults in Developed region | Children in Developing region (n = 755) |
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of positive | positive rate(%) | No. of positive | positive rate(%) | No. of isolates | positive rate(%) |
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Bacteria | 198 | 13.92 | 186 | 17.77 | 220 | 29.14 | 0.009 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
|
| 61 | 4.29 | 35 | 3.34 | 40 | 5.30 | 0.229 | 0.369 | 0.287 | 0.357 | 0.297 | |
|
| 3 | 0.21 | 15 | 1.43 | 128 | 16.95 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
| DEC | 128 | 9.00 | 111 | 10.60 | 54 | 7.15 | 0.184 | 0.824 | 0.138 | 0.044 | 0.111 | |
| EAggEC | 50 | 3.52 | 18 | 1.72 | 22 | 2.91 | 0.007 | 0.000 | 0.455 | 0.161 | 0.320 | |
| EPEC | 64 | 4.50 | 22 | 2.10 | 27 | 3.58 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.305 | 0.291 | 0.367 | |
| ETEC | 5 | 0.35 | 65 | 6.21 | 2 | 0.26 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.734 | 0.741 | 0.749 | |
| EIEC | 5 | 0.35 | 5 | 0.48 | 1 | 0.13 | 0.626 | 0.665 | 0.353 | 0.290 | 0.294 | |
| STEC | 5 | 0.35 | 1 | 0.10 | 2 | 0.26 | 0.201 | 0.145 | 0.734 | 0.606 | 0.700 | |
|
| 1 | 0.07 | 25 | 2.39 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.466 | 0.541 | 0.471 | |
|
| 7 | 0.49 | 0 | 0.00 | 2 | 0.26 | 0.023 | 0.014 | 0.431 | 0.230 | 0.539 | |
|
| 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.13 | - | - | 0.170 | 0.102 | 0.166 | |
|
| 7 | 0.49 | 7 | 0.67 | 27 | 3.58 | 0.564 | 0.651 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
|
| 0 | 0.00 | 3 | 0.29 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.043 | 0.062 | - | - | - | |
| Virus | 469 | 32.98 | 120 | 23.67 | - | - | 0.000 | 0.010 | ||||
| Rotavirus[ | 179 | 12.59 | 21 | 4.14 | - | - | 0.000 | 0.001 | ||||
| Norovirus | 139 | 9.77 | 57 | 11.24 | - | - | 0.314 | 0.248 | ||||
| Sapovirus | 64 | 4.50 | 20 | 3.74 | - | - | 0.626 | 0.755 | ||||
| Astrovirus | 48 | 3.38 | 25 | 4.93 | - | - | 0.106 | 0.039 | ||||
| Adenovirus | 93 | 6.54 | 4 | 0.79 | - | - | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||||
a: n1: Total number of cases detecting bacteria; n2:Number of cases detecting virus and bacteria both.
b: Vibrio cholera and Vibrio parahaemolyticus.
c: Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis.
d: Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli.
e: All of the positive cases were Rotavirus Group A.
Fig 2Pathogen Spectrum of cases in the developed and developing region (%: proportion).
A1. Bacteria spectrum of childhood cases in the developed region; A2: Bacteria spectrum of childhood cases in the developing region; A3: Bacteria spectrum of adult cases in the developed region; B1. Pathogens (one case was detected bacteria and virus both) spectrum of childhood cases in the developed region; B2: Pathogens (one case was detected bacteria and virus both) spectrum of adult cases in the developed region. C1. Virus spectrum of childhood cases in the developed region; C2: Virus spectrum of adult cases in the developed region.
Fig 3The proportion of five classes of DEC and serum groups of Shigella.
A. The proportion of five classes of DEC; B: The proportion of serum groups of Shigella; C: The proportion of type of S.Flexneri.
Pathogens of Mixed Infection in Diarrhea Cases.
| Children in Developed region | Adult in Developed region | Children in Developing region | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| DEC+ Rotavirus | 4 | 2 | |
| DEC+ Norovirus | 9 | 5 | |
| DEC+ Sapovirus | 2 | 1 | |
| DEC+Astrovirus | 1 | ||
| DEC+ Adenovirus | 9 | ||
|
| 4 | 1 | |
|
| 3 | ||
|
| 2 | ||
|
| 1 | ||
| DEC+ | 1 | ||
| DEC+Rotavirus+Norovirus | 2 | ||
| DEC+Norovirus+ Sapovirus+ | 1 | ||
| DEC+ Norovirus+ Sapovirus | 1 | ||
| DEC+ Norovirus+ Astrovirus | 1 | ||
|
| 1 | ||
|
| 1 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| DEC+ | 5 | 1 | 2 |
| DEC+ | 2 | 7 | |
| DEC+ | 2 | ||
| DEC+ | 1 | 1 | |
| DEC+ | 2 | ||
|
| 4 | ||
|
| 6 | ||
|
| 1 | ||
|
| 8 | ||
|
| 1 | ||
|
| 1 | ||
| DEC+ | 1 | ||
| DEC+ | 1 | 1 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Rotavirus+ Norovirus | 7 | 1 | |
| Rotavirus +Sapovirus | 8 | 2 | |
| Rotavirus+Astrovirus | 3 | 1 | |
| Rotavirus+ Adenovirus | 6 | ||
| Norovirus+Sapovirus | 5 | ||
| Norovirus +Astrovirus | 3 | ||
| Norovirus+ Adenovirus | 3 | ||
| Sapovirus+ Adenovirus | 5 | ||
| Sapovirus +Astrovirus | 2 | ||
| Rotavirus+Astrovirus+ Adenovirus | 2 | ||
| Rotavirus+ Norovirus+ Sapovirus | 1 |
Fig 4The morbidity of Shigella (symptoms diagnosed) reported by clinicians.