| Literature DB >> 26528188 |
Dongdong Deng1, Hermenegild Arevalo1, Farhad Pashakhanloo1, Adityo Prakosa1, Hiroshi Ashikaga2, Elliot McVeigh3, Henry Halperin4, Natalia Trayanova1.
Abstract
Identification of optimal ablation sites in hearts with infarct-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) remains difficult to achieve with the current catheter-based mapping techniques. Limitations arise from the ambiguities in determining the reentrant pathways location(s). The goal of this study was to develop experimentally validated, individualized computer models of infarcted swine hearts, reconstructed from high-resolution ex-vivo MRI and to examine the accuracy of the reentrant circuit location prediction when models of the same hearts are instead reconstructed from low clinical-resolution MRI scans. To achieve this goal, we utilized retrospective data obtained from four pigs ~10 weeks post infarction that underwent VT induction via programmed stimulation and epicardial activation mapping via a multielectrode epicardial sock. After the experiment, high-resolution ex-vivo MRI with late gadolinium enhancement was acquired. The Hi-res images were downsampled into two lower resolutions (Med-res and Low-res) in order to replicate image quality obtainable in the clinic. The images were segmented and models were reconstructed from the three image stacks for each pig heart. VT induction similar to what was performed in the experiment was simulated. Results of the reconstructions showed that the geometry of the ventricles including the infarct could be accurately obtained from Med-res and Low-res images. Simulation results demonstrated that induced VTs in the Med-res and Low-res models were located close to those in Hi-res models. Importantly, all models, regardless of image resolution, accurately predicted the VT morphology and circuit location induced in the experiment. These results demonstrate that MRI-based computer models of hearts with ischemic cardiomyopathy could provide a unique opportunity to predict and analyze VT resulting for from specific infarct architecture, and thus may assist in clinical decisions to identify and ablate the reentrant circuit(s).Entities:
Keywords: MRI reconstruction; arrhythmia; computational modeling; myocardial infarction; reentry
Year: 2015 PMID: 26528188 PMCID: PMC4602125 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00282
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Figure 1Segmentation of Hi-res and Low-res images. (Top row) Automatic segmentation of Hi-res ventricular epicardium and endocardium (A), gray level thresholding of infarct into GZ and scar (B), and final segmentation (C). (Bottom row) Ventricular segmentation in the low-res images was performed via fitting splines through manually determined landmark points on the boundaries of the epi- and endocardial surfaces (D). Gray level thresholding to segment the GZ and scar was performed similar to Hi-res images (E), and the final interpolated segmattion was shown in (F).
Figure 2Pig 1 simulation and experimental results. (A) 1st row: Reconstructed models with the epicardium rendered semi-transparent. 2nd row: Activation maps of simulated VT all had breakthrough pattern on the epicardium. Pink arrows denote propagation direction. 3rd row: Intramural (Hi-res) or endocardial (Med-res and Low-res) view showing reentrant source. In the intramural view, the cross-section location is marked by dashed line in the 2nd row. (B) Pseudo-ECGs for one VT cycle length and the MAD score. (C) Experimentally recorded epicardial activation map.
Normal, GZ, and scar volumes in the reconstructed heart models.
| Pig1 | Normal | 139.7 | 94.0 | 150.5 | 91.0 | 155.4 | 91.7 |
| GZ | 5.4 | 3.6 | 9.0 | 5.4 | 8.0 | 4.7 | |
| Scar | 3.5 | 2.4 | 5.8 | 3.6 | 6.0 | 3.5 | |
| Pig2 | Normal | 148.3 | 95.6 | 128.8 | 91.9 | 130.3 | 93.9 |
| GZ | 4.3 | 2.8 | 8.1 | 5.8 | 7.7 | 3.3 | |
| Scar | 2.5 | 1.6 | 3.3 | 2.4 | 3.7 | 2.7 | |
| Pig3 | Normal | 153.9 | 92.5 | 139.5 | 89.9 | 148.1 | 91.4 |
| GZ | 7.5 | 4.5 | 10.0 | 6.4 | 7.4 | 4.6 | |
| Scar | 4.9 | 2.9 | 5.7 | 3.7 | 6.5 | 4.0 | |
| Pig4 | Normal | 135.4 | 91.8 | 144.8 | 90.3 | 147.3 | 91.3 |
| GZ | 8.2 | 5.6 | 9.9 | 6.2 | 9.6 | 5.9 | |
| Scar | 3.9 | 2.6 | 5.7 | 3.6 | 4.5 | 2.8 | |
| Mean ± SD | Normal | 144.3 ± 7.2 | 93.5 ± 1.5 | 140.9 ± 8.0 | 90.8 ± 0.8 | 145.3 ± 9.2 | 92.0 ± 1.1 |
| GZ | 6.4 ± 1.6 | 4.1 ± 1.0 | 9.3 ± 0.8 | 6.0 ± 0.4 | 7.4 ± 1.8 | 4.7 ± 0.9 | |
| Scar | 3.7 ± 0.9 | 2.4 ± 0.5 | 5.1 ± 1.1 | 3.3 ± 0.5 | 5.2 ± 1.1 | 3.3 ± 0.6 | |
| Total | 154.4 ± 7.5 | 155.3 ± 9.4 | 157.9 ± 11.5 | ||||
Distance between organizing centers of reentrant circuits.
| Pig 1 | 13.6 | 9.4 | 10.3 |
| Pig 2 | 14.5 | 18.3 | 4.5 |
| Pig 3 | 6.2 | 7.9 | 2.4 |
| Pig 4 | 13.0 | 9.4 | 17.1 |
Figure 3Pig 2 simulation and experimental results. (A) 1st row: Ventricular and infarct geometries with the epicardium rendered semi-transparent. 2nd row: Simulated VTs all had epicardial breakthrough pattern (Pink arrows: propagation direction). 3rd row: Intramural (Hi-res and Med-res) or endocardial (Low-res) view showing reentrant source. In the intramural view, the cross-section location is marked by dashed line in the 2nd row. (B) Pseudo-ECGs for one VT cycle length and the MAD score. (C) Experimentally recorded epicardial activation map had breakthrough pattern as well.
Figure 4Pig 3 simulation and experimental results. (A) 1st row: Reconstructed models with the epicardium rendered semi-transparent. 2nd row: Activation maps of simulated VT had epicardial breakthrough pattern for the Hi-res and Med res models and epicardial figure-of-8 pattern for the Low-res model. Pink arrows denote propagation direction. 3rd row: Intramural (Hi-res) or endocardial (Med-res) view showing reentrant source. In the intramural view, the cross-section location is marked by dashed line in the 2nd row. For the Low-res model, endocardial view shows that epicardial reentry manifests as breakthrough on the endocardium. (B) Pseudo-ECGs for one VT cycle length and the MAD score. (C) Epicardial figure-of-8 activation pattern recorded during experimentally induced VT.
Figure 5Pig 4 simulation and experimental results. (A) 1st row: Image-based models with different regions color coded and epicardium rendered semi-transparent. 2nd row: Simulated VT activation maps with epicardial figure-of-8 pattern for Hi-res and breakthrough for the downsampled models (pink arrows: propagation direction). 3rd row: Activation maps for LV endocardium showing how surface reentry manifests as breakthrough on endocardium (Hi-res model) and the reentrant source of epicardial breakthrough pattern (Med-res and Low-res models). (B) Pseudo-ECGs for one VT cycle length and the MAD score. (C) Activation map reconstructed from sock electrodes during an episode of induced VT had an epicardial figure-of-8 activation pattern.