| Literature DB >> 26521666 |
Nick Hopwood, Peter Murray Jones, Lauren Kassell, Jim Secord.
Abstract
Communication should be central to histories of reproduction, because it has structured how people do and do not reproduce. Yet communication has been so pervasive, and so various, that it is often taken for granted and the historical specificities overlooked. Making communication a frame for histories of reproduction can draw a fragmented field together, including by putting the promotion of esoteric ideas on a par with other practical activities. Paying communication close attention can revitalize the history of reproduction over the long term by highlighting continuities as well as the complex connections between new technologies and new approaches. Themes such as the power of storytelling, the claiming and challenging of expertise, and relations between knowledge and ignorance, secrecy and propriety also invite further study.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26521666 PMCID: PMC4655582 DOI: 10.1353/bhm.2015.0064
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bull Hist Med ISSN: 0007-5140 Impact factor: 1.314