Literature DB >> 21319935

Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived music quality.

Kathryn H Arehart1, James M Kates, Melinda C Anderson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the relative impact of different forms of hearing aid signal processing on quality ratings of music.
DESIGN: Music quality was assessed using a rating scale for three types of music: orchestral classical music, jazz instrumental, and a female vocalist. The music stimuli were subjected to a wide range of simulated hearing aid processing conditions including, (1) noise and nonlinear processing, (2) linear filtering, and (3) combinations of noise, nonlinear, and linear filtering. STUDY SAMPLE: Quality ratings were measured in a group of 19 listeners with normal hearing and a group of 15 listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment.
RESULTS: Quality ratings in both groups were generally comparable, were reliable across test sessions, were impacted more by noise and nonlinear signal processing than by linear filtering, and were significantly affected by the genre of music.
CONCLUSIONS: The average quality ratings for music were reasonably well predicted by the hearing aid speech quality index (HASQI), but additional work is needed to optimize the index to the wide range of music genres and processing conditions included in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21319935     DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2010.539273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  7 in total

1.  Comparing the information conveyed by envelope modulation for speech intelligibility, speech quality, and music quality.

Authors:  James M Kates; Kathryn H Arehart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Music Participation Among School-Aged Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.

Authors:  Erik J Jorgensen; Elizabeth A Walker
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 1.493

3.  The Hearing-Aid Audio Quality Index (HAAQI).

Authors:  James M Kates; Kathryn H Arehart
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process       Date:  2015-12-10

4.  Music and hearing aids.

Authors:  Sara M K Madsen; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Dynamic Range Across Music Genres and the Perception of Dynamic Compression in Hearing-Impaired Listeners.

Authors:  Martin Kirchberger; Frank A Russo
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Perceived Sound Quality Dimensions Influencing Frequency-Gain Shaping Preferences for Hearing Aid-Amplified Speech and Music.

Authors:  Jonathan M Vaisberg; Steve Beaulac; Danielle Glista; Ewan A Macpherson; Susan D Scollie
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  A Comparison of Environment Classification Among Premium Hearing Instruments.

Authors:  Anusha Yellamsetty; Erol J Ozmeral; Robert A Budinsky; David A Eddins
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.