Stephen J Teach1, Michelle A Gill2, Alkis Togias3, Christine A Sorkness4, Samuel J Arbes5, Agustin Calatroni5, Jeremy J Wildfire5, Peter J Gergen3, Robyn T Cohen6, Jacqueline A Pongracic7, Carolyn M Kercsmar8, Gurjit K Khurana Hershey8, Rebecca S Gruchalla2, Andrew H Liu9, Edward M Zoratti10, Meyer Kattan11, Kristine A Grindle4, James E Gern4, William W Busse4, Stanley J Szefler12. 1. Division of Emergency Medicine and the Department of Pediatrics, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC. Electronic address: steach@childrensnational.org. 2. Departments of Pediatrics and Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex. 3. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Md. 4. University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis. 5. Rho Inc, Federal Systems Division, Chapel Hill, NC. 6. Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass. 7. Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Ill. 8. Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio. 9. National Jewish Health, Denver, Colo; Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo. 10. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich. 11. College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY. 12. Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Short-term targeted treatment can potentially prevent fall asthma exacerbations while limiting therapy exposure. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare (1) omalizumab with placebo and (2) omalizumab with an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) boost with regard to fall exacerbation rates when initiated 4 to 6 weeks before return to school. METHODS: A 3-arm, randomized, double-blind, double placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial was conducted among inner-city asthmatic children aged 6 to 17 years with 1 or more recent exacerbations (clincaltrials.gov #NCT01430403). Guidelines-based therapy was continued over a 4- to 9-month run-in phase and a 4-month intervention phase. In a subset the effects of omalizumab on IFN-α responses to rhinovirus in PBMCs were examined. RESULTS:Before the falls of 2012 and 2013, 727 children were enrolled, 513 were randomized, and 478 were analyzed. The fall exacerbation rate was significantly lower in the omalizumab versus placebo arms (11.3% vs 21.0%; odds ratio [OR], 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25-0.92), but there was no significant difference between omalizumab and ICS boost (8.4% vs 11.1%; OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.33-1.64). In a prespecified subgroup analysis, among participants with an exacerbation during the run-in phase, omalizumab was significantly more efficacious than both placebo (6.4% vs 36.3%; OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02-0.64) and ICS boost (2.0% vs 27.8%; OR, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.002-0.98). Omalizumab improved IFN-α responses to rhinovirus, and within the omalizumab group, greater IFN-α increases were associated with fewer exacerbations (OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.01-0.88). Adverse events were rare and similar among arms. CONCLUSIONS: Adding omalizumab before return to school to ongoing guidelines-based care among inner-city youth reduces fall asthma exacerbations, particularly among those with a recent exacerbation.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Short-term targeted treatment can potentially prevent fall asthma exacerbations while limiting therapy exposure. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare (1) omalizumab with placebo and (2) omalizumab with an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) boost with regard to fall exacerbation rates when initiated 4 to 6 weeks before return to school. METHODS: A 3-arm, randomized, double-blind, double placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial was conducted among inner-city asthmatic children aged 6 to 17 years with 1 or more recent exacerbations (clincaltrials.gov #NCT01430403). Guidelines-based therapy was continued over a 4- to 9-month run-in phase and a 4-month intervention phase. In a subset the effects of omalizumab on IFN-α responses to rhinovirus in PBMCs were examined. RESULTS: Before the falls of 2012 and 2013, 727 children were enrolled, 513 were randomized, and 478 were analyzed. The fall exacerbation rate was significantly lower in the omalizumab versus placebo arms (11.3% vs 21.0%; odds ratio [OR], 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25-0.92), but there was no significant difference between omalizumab and ICS boost (8.4% vs 11.1%; OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.33-1.64). In a prespecified subgroup analysis, among participants with an exacerbation during the run-in phase, omalizumab was significantly more efficacious than both placebo (6.4% vs 36.3%; OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02-0.64) and ICS boost (2.0% vs 27.8%; OR, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.002-0.98). Omalizumab improved IFN-α responses to rhinovirus, and within the omalizumab group, greater IFN-α increases were associated with fewer exacerbations (OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.01-0.88). Adverse events were rare and similar among arms. CONCLUSIONS: Adding omalizumab before return to school to ongoing guidelines-based care among inner-city youth reduces fall asthma exacerbations, particularly among those with a recent exacerbation.
Authors: Stanley J Szefler; Herman Mitchell; Christine A Sorkness; Peter J Gergen; George T O'Connor; Wayne J Morgan; Meyer Kattan; Jacqueline A Pongracic; Stephen J Teach; Gordon R Bloomberg; Peyton A Eggleston; Rebecca S Gruchalla; Carolyn M Kercsmar; Andrew H Liu; Jeremy J Wildfire; Matthew D Curry; William W Busse Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-09-20 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Ratko Djukanović; Susan J Wilson; Monica Kraft; Nizar N Jarjour; Mark Steel; K Fan Chung; Weibin Bao; Angel Fowler-Taylor; John Matthews; William W Busse; Stephen T Holgate; John V Fahy Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2004-06-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Peter A B Wark; Sebastian L Johnston; Fabio Bucchieri; Robert Powell; Sarah Puddicombe; Vasile Laza-Stanca; Stephen T Holgate; Donna E Davies Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2005-03-21 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Neil W Johnston; Sebastian L Johnston; Joanne M Duncan; Justina M Greene; Tatiana Kebadze; Paul K Keith; Madan Roy; Susan Waserman; Malcolm R Sears Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Regina K Rowe; David M Pyle; Andrew R Tomlinson; Tinghong Lv; Zheng Hu; Michelle A Gill Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2017-01-10 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Kohei Hasegawa; Jonathan M Mansbach; Yury A Bochkov; James E Gern; Pedro A Piedra; Cindy S Bauer; Stephen J Teach; Susan Wu; Ashley F Sullivan; Carlos A Camargo Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: William J Sheehan; Jonathan M Gaffin; David B Peden; Robert K Bush; Wanda Phipatanakul Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Philippa Hillyer; Viraj P Mane; Aaron Chen; Maria B Dos Santos; Lynnsie M Schramm; Rachel E Shepard; Cindy Luongo; Cyril Le Nouën; Lei Huang; Lihan Yan; Ursula J Buchholz; Ronald G Jubin; Peter L Collins; Ronald L Rabin Journal: Virology Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 3.616
Authors: David B Kantor; Molly C McDonald; Nicole Stenquist; Blake J Schultz; Craig D Smallwood; Kyle A Nelson; Wanda Phipatanakul; Joel N Hirschhorn Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2016-12-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Anna Pomés; Geoffrey A Mueller; Thomas A Randall; Martin D Chapman; L Karla Arruda Journal: Curr Allergy Asthma Rep Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 4.806