Literature DB >> 26514987

Conservative and compensatory evolution in oxidative phosphorylation complexes of angiosperms with highly divergent rates of mitochondrial genome evolution.

Justin C Havird1, Nicholas S Whitehill2, Christopher D Snow3, Daniel B Sloan4.   

Abstract

Interactions between nuclear and mitochondrial gene products are critical for eukaryotic cell function. Nuclear genes encoding mitochondrial-targeted proteins (N-mt genes) experience elevated rates of evolution, which has often been interpreted as evidence of nuclear compensation in response to elevated mitochondrial mutation rates. However, N-mt genes may be under relaxed functional constraints, which could also explain observed increases in their evolutionary rate. To disentangle these hypotheses, we examined patterns of sequence and structural evolution in nuclear- and mitochondrial-encoded oxidative phosphorylation proteins from species in the angiosperm genus Silene with vastly different mitochondrial mutation rates. We found correlated increases in N-mt gene evolution in species with fast-evolving mitochondrial DNA. Structural modeling revealed an overrepresentation of N-mt substitutions at positions that directly contact mutated residues in mitochondrial-encoded proteins, despite overall patterns of conservative structural evolution. These findings support the hypothesis that selection for compensatory changes in response to mitochondrial mutations contributes to the elevated rate of evolution in N-mt genes. We discuss these results in light of theories implicating mitochondrial mutation rates and mitonuclear coevolution as drivers of speciation and suggest comparative and experimental approaches that could take advantage of heterogeneity in rates of mtDNA evolution across eukaryotes to evaluate such theories.
© 2015 The Author(s). Evolution © 2015 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cytonuclear; electron transport; evolutionary genomics; mitochondrial mutations; mitonuclear interactions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26514987      PMCID: PMC4715514          DOI: 10.1111/evo.12808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  86 in total

1.  High direct estimate of the mutation rate in the mitochondrial genome of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  D R Denver; K Morris; M Lynch; L L Vassilieva; W K Thomas
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations.

Authors:  Raphael Guerois; Jens Erik Nielsen; Luis Serrano
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-07-05       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Experimental analysis of the Arabidopsis mitochondrial proteome highlights signaling and regulatory components, provides assessment of targeting prediction programs, and indicates plant-specific mitochondrial proteins.

Authors:  Joshua L Heazlewood; Julian S Tonti-Filippini; Alexander M Gout; David A Day; James Whelan; A Harvey Millar
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 4.  Organization and expression of organellar genomes.

Authors:  Adrian C Barbrook; Christopher J Howe; Davy P Kurniawan; Sarah J Tarr
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Adaptive evolution of energy metabolism genes and the origin of flight in bats.

Authors:  Yong-Yi Shen; Lu Liang; Zhou-Hai Zhu; Wei-Ping Zhou; David M Irwin; Ya-Ping Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The evolution of sex: A new hypothesis based on mitochondrial mutational erosion: Mitochondrial mutational erosion in ancestral eukaryotes would favor the evolution of sex, harnessing nuclear recombination to optimize compensatory nuclear coadaptation.

Authors:  Justin C Havird; Matthew D Hall; Damian K Dowling
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.345

7.  Structural and content diversity of mitochondrial genome in beet: a comparative genomic analysis.

Authors:  A Darracq; J S Varré; L Maréchal-Drouard; A Courseaux; V Castric; P Saumitou-Laprade; S Oztas; P Lenoble; B Vacherie; V Barbe; P Touzet
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 3.416

8.  Cytonuclear Interactions in the Evolution of Animal Mitochondrial tRNA Metabolism.

Authors:  Walker Pett; Dennis V Lavrov
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  Pleiotropic effects of a mitochondrial-nuclear incompatibility depend upon the accelerating effect of temperature in Drosophila.

Authors:  Luke A Hoekstra; Mohammad A Siddiq; Kristi L Montooth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  BeAtMuSiC: Prediction of changes in protein-protein binding affinity on mutations.

Authors:  Yves Dehouck; Jean Marc Kwasigroch; Marianne Rooman; Dimitri Gilis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  24 in total

1.  Do angiosperms with highly divergent mitochondrial genomes have altered mitochondrial function?

Authors:  Justin C Havird; Gregory R Noe; Luke Link; Amber Torres; David C Logan; Daniel B Sloan; Adam J Chicco
Journal:  Mitochondrion       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.160

2.  Positive Selection in Rapidly Evolving Plastid-Nuclear Enzyme Complexes.

Authors:  Kate Rockenbach; Justin C Havird; J Grey Monroe; Deborah A Triant; Douglas R Taylor; Daniel B Sloan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Sex and Mitonuclear Adaptation in Experimental Caenorhabditis elegans Populations.

Authors:  Riana I Wernick; Stephen F Christy; Dana K Howe; Jennifer A Sullins; Joseph F Ramirez; Maura Sare; McKenna J Penley; Levi T Morran; Dee R Denver; Suzanne Estes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The Roles of Mutation, Selection, and Expression in Determining Relative Rates of Evolution in Mitochondrial versus Nuclear Genomes.

Authors:  Justin C Havird; Daniel B Sloan
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Assessing the fitness consequences of mitonuclear interactions in natural populations.

Authors:  Geoffrey E Hill; Justin C Havird; Daniel B Sloan; Ronald S Burton; Chris Greening; Damian K Dowling
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2018-12-26

6.  High mitochondrial mutation rates in Silene are associated with nuclear-mediated changes in mitochondrial physiology.

Authors:  Ryan J Weaver; Gina Carrion; Rachel Nix; Gerald P Maeda; Samantha Rabinowitz; Erik N K Iverson; Kiley Thueson; Justin C Havird
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Episodic evolution of coadapted sets of amino acid sites in mitochondrial proteins.

Authors:  Alexey D Neverov; Anfisa V Popova; Gennady G Fedonin; Evgeny A Cheremukhin; Galya V Klink; Georgii A Bazykin
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Relaxed selection on male mitochondrial genes in DUI bivalves eases the need for mitonuclear coevolution.

Authors:  Gerald P Maeda; Mariangela Iannello; Hunter J McConie; Fabrizio Ghiselli; Justin C Havird
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 2.516

Review 9.  Cytonuclear integration and co-evolution.

Authors:  Daniel B Sloan; Jessica M Warren; Alissa M Williams; Zhiqiang Wu; Salah E Abdel-Ghany; Adam J Chicco; Justin C Havird
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 53.242

10.  Detecting de novo mitochondrial mutations in angiosperms with highly divergent evolutionary rates.

Authors:  Amanda K Broz; Gus Waneka; Zhiqiang Wu; Matheus Fernandes Gyorfy; Daniel B Sloan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.