Literature DB >> 26514137

Long-term oncologic outcome of robotic versus open total thyroidectomy in PTC: a case-matched retrospective study.

Seul Gi Lee1, Jandee Lee1, Min Jhi Kim1, Jung Bum Choi1, Tae Hyung Kim1, Eun Jeong Ban1, Cho Rok Lee1, Sang Wook Kang1, Jong Ju Jeong1, Kee Hyun Nam1, Young Suk Jo2, Woong Youn Chung3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The role of the robot in thyroid surgery remains uncertain, and it is unclear whether robotic total thyroidectomy (R-TT) can be justified as a standard treatment for patients with thyroid cancer. This study compared the long-term operative results and oncologic outcomes of R-TT and conventional open TT (O-TT) after propensity score matching of the cohorts.
METHODS: This study retrospectively evaluated patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) who underwent TT with central compartment node dissection (CCND) by a single surgeon in tertiary medical center. Of the 833 patients, 94 (11.3 %) were lost to follow-up. 245 (33.2 %) underwent R-TT, and 494 (66.8 %) underwent O-TT. The mean follow-up duration was 74 (range 61-91) months. Propensity score matching in age, gender, tumor size, extrathyroidal invasion, multiplicity, bilaterality, and TNM stage identified 206 pairs of patients. The long-term oncologic outcomes were assessed in the R-TT and O-TT groups before and after adjustment for baseline covariates.
RESULTS: After adjustment for baseline covariates, serum thyroglobulin (Tg) (p = 0.746) and anti-thyroglobulin antibody (TgAb) (p = 0.394) concentrations were similar in the two groups 5 years after surgery. Nine patients experienced locoregional recurrence, six in the O-TT and three in the R-TT group, with all recurrences in regional LNs. Disease-free survival (DFS) was similar in the R-TT and O-TT groups before matching (p = 0.890) and after adjustment for baseline covariates (p = 0.882).
CONCLUSION: This represents the first report of 5-year surgical outcomes in patients who underwent R-TT for thyroid cancer. Long-term oncologic quality was similar after R-TT and O-TT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Case-matched study; Disease-free survival; Long-term oncologic outcome; Papillary thyroid cancer; Robotic thyroidectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26514137     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4632-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  23 in total

1.  Robotic thyroidectomy by a gasless unilateral axillo-breast or axillary approach: our early experiences.

Authors:  Kyung Tae; Yong Bae Ji; Jin Hyeok Jeong; Seung Hwan Lee; Mi Ae Jeong; Chul Won Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Robot-assisted endoscopic surgery for thyroid cancer: experience with the first 100 patients.

Authors:  Sang-Wook Kang; Jong Ju Jeong; Ji-Sup Yun; Tae Yon Sung; Seung Chul Lee; Yong Sang Lee; Kee-Hyun Nam; Hang Seok Chang; Woong Youn Chung; Cheong Soo Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Functional voice and swallowing outcomes after robotic thyroidectomy by a gasless unilateral axillo-breast approach: comparison with open thyroidectomy.

Authors:  Kyung Tae; Ki Yong Kim; Bo Ram Yun; Yong Bae Ji; Chul Won Park; Dong Sun Kim; Tae Wha Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Robot-assisted endoscopic thyroidectomy for thyroid malignancies using a gasless transaxillary approach.

Authors:  Sang-Wook Kang; Jong Ju Jeong; Kee-Hyun Nam; Hang Seok Chang; Woong Youn Chung; Cheong Soo Park
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Robotic thyroid surgery using a gasless, transaxillary approach and the da Vinci S system: the operative outcomes of 338 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Sang-Wook Kang; Seung Chul Lee; So Hee Lee; Kang Young Lee; Jong Ju Jeong; Yong Sang Lee; Kee-Hyun Nam; Hang Seok Chang; Woong Youn Chung; Cheong Soo Park
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Revised American Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer.

Authors:  David S Cooper; Gerard M Doherty; Bryan R Haugen; Bryan R Hauger; Richard T Kloos; Stephanie L Lee; Susan J Mandel; Ernest L Mazzaferri; Bryan McIver; Furio Pacini; Martin Schlumberger; Steven I Sherman; David L Steward; R Michael Tuttle
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.568

7.  Robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy: an examination of the first one hundred cases.

Authors:  Emad H Kandil; Salem I Noureldine; Lu Yao; Douglas P Slakey
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Differences in postoperative outcomes, function, and cosmesis: open versus robotic thyroidectomy.

Authors:  Jandee Lee; Kuk Young Nah; Ra Mi Kim; Yeun Hee Ahn; Euy-Young Soh; Woong Youn Chung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Endoscopic transaxillary approach to the thyroid gland: our early experience.

Authors:  T D Duncan; Q Rashid; F Speights; I Ejeh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Predictive factors and pattern of locoregional recurrence after prophylactic central neck dissection in papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Brian Hung-Hin Lang; Diane T Y Chan; Kai Pun Wong; Kandy K C Wong; Koon Yat Wan
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Gasless trans-axillary robotic thyroidectomy: the technique and evidence.

Authors:  Hassan A Alzahrani; Khuzema Mohsin; Daniah Bu Ali; Fadi Murad; Emad Kandil
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-06

Review 2.  Robotic thyroidectomy versus conventional open thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing-Hua Pan; Hong Zhou; Xiao-Xu Zhao; Hui Ding; Li Wei; Li Qin; Yun-Long Pan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional endoscopic-assisted thyroidectomy via the anterior chest approach: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Shi-Tong Yu; Ping Han; Faya Liang; Qian Cai; Peiliang Lin; Renhui Chen; Xiaoming Huang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Yonsei Experience of 5000 Gasless Transaxillary Robotic Thyroidectomies.

Authors:  Min Jhi Kim; Kee-Hyun Nam; Seul Gi Lee; Jung Bum Choi; Tae Hyung Kim; Cho Rok Lee; Jandee Lee; Sang-Wook Kang; Jong Ju Jeong; Woong Youn Chung
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Oncologic outcomes of robotic thyroidectomy: 5-year experience with propensity score matching.

Authors:  Kyung Tae; Chang Myeon Song; Yong Bae Ji; Eui Suk Sung; Jin Hyeok Jeong; Dong Sun Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Remote Access Thyroid Surgery: A Review of Literature.

Authors:  Akshay Kudpaje; Anand Subash; Narayana Subramaniam; Carsten E Palme; Vishal Rao Us; Gururaj Arakeri
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-06-09

Review 7.  Role of Robotics in Non-oropharyngeal Head and Neck Tumours.

Authors:  Ravi Shankar; Aseem Mishra; Akshat Malik
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-02-27

8.  Surgical outcomes of robotic thyroidectomy vs. conventional open thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Jeong Nam Cho; Won Seo Park; Sun Young Min; Sang-Ah Han; Jeong-Yoon Song
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Successful Treatment of Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma with Transaxillary Robotic Surgery and Radioiodine: The First European Experience.

Authors:  Marie Alix Balay; Patrick Aidan; Marie Helene Schlageter; Odette Georges; Taly Meas; Maroun Bechara; Marie Elisabeth Toubert; Isabelle Faugeron; Herve Monpeyssen; Cécile N Chougnet
Journal:  Eur Thyroid J       Date:  2018-02-21

Review 10.  Recent Trends in Surgical Approach to Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Leonardo Rossi; Gabriele Materazzi; Sohail Bakkar; Paolo Miccoli
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.