| Literature DB >> 35462662 |
Akshay Kudpaje1, Anand Subash1, Narayana Subramaniam2, Carsten E Palme3, Vishal Rao Us1, Gururaj Arakeri1,4.
Abstract
Since the first description of endoscopic thyroid lobectomy in 1997, a variety of techniques have been developed to avoid the visible cervical scar conventionally been associated with thyroidectomy. These "remote access" approaches, which typically use either endoscopic or robotic instrumentation, have successfully avoided the anterior neck scar, which has a measurable impact on the patient's quality of life (Graves and Suh Surgery 168(5):845-850, 2020; Sakorafas World J Surg 34(8):1793-1804, 2010). The main advantage of these techniques is better cosmesis compared to conventional transcervical approaches (Graves and Suh Surgery 168(5):845-850, 2020) However, these techniques have failed to gain widespread acceptance in the surgical community because of the technical challenges, scepticism about oncological safety and cost factors. This review presents an overview of the various methods of remote access thyroid surgery (RATS) and also evaluates the selection criteria, oncological efficacy, training requirements and key advantages of this technique. © Indian Association of Surgical Oncology 2021.Entities:
Keywords: Endoscopic thyroidectomy; Minimal access surgery; Remote access surgery; Robotic surgery; Thyroid cancer; Thyroidectomy
Year: 2021 PMID: 35462662 PMCID: PMC8986942 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-021-01364-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Surg Oncol ISSN: 0975-7651