| Literature DB >> 26512684 |
Maja Radziemska1, Joanna Fronczyk2.
Abstract
Express roads are a potential source of heavy metal contamination in the surrounding environment. The Warsaw Expressway (E30) is one of the busiest roads in the capital of Poland and cuts through the ecologically valuable area (Mazowiecki Natural Landscape Park). Soil samples were collected at distances of 0.5, 4.5 and 25 m from the expressway. The concentrations of cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn) were determined in the soils by the flame atomic absorption spectrometry method (FAAS). Soils located in the direct proximity of the analyzed stretch of road were found to have the highest values of pH and electrical conductivity (EC), which decreased along with an increase in the distance from the expressway. The contents of Cd, Cu and Zn were found to be higher than Polish national averages, whereas the average values of Ni and Pb were not exceeded. The pollution level was estimated based on the geo-accumulation index (Igeo), and the pollution index (PI). The results of Igeo and PI indexes revealed the following orders: Cu < Zn < Ni < Cd < Pb and Cu < Ni < Cd < Zn < Pb, and comparison with geochemical background values showed higher concentration of zinc, lead and cadmium.Entities:
Keywords: expressways and roads; heavy metals; pollution estimation; protected areas; roadside hazards
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26512684 PMCID: PMC4627036 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph121013372
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1The study area and the soil sampling locations. MSa: medium sand; grSa: sand with gravel; siSa: silty sand; FSa: fine sand.
Soil pollution degrees based on I and PI.
| Pollution Category | Pollution Category | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Uncontaminated | ≤1 | low | |
| 0 < | 1 | Uncontaminated to moderately contaminated | 1–3 | middle |
| 1 < | 2 | Moderately contaminated | >3 | high |
| 2 < | 3 | Moderately to strongly contaminated | ||
| 3 < | 4 | Strongly contaminated | ||
| 4 < | 5 | Strongly to extremely contaminated | ||
| 6 | Extremely contaminated |
Figure 2Ranges of particle size variability in the analyzed Sections (A–C).
Figure 3Boxplots showing the median, quartiles, and minimum and maximum values of the pH and electrical conductivity (EC) with the depth and distance values from the road.
Figure 4Boxplots showing the median, quartiles, and minimum and maximum values of the heavy metals concentrations with the depth and distance from the road. Dotted horizontal line represent heavy metal level in protected areas according Polish law.
The results of the Pearson correlation analysis between the different measured indicators, at five soil depths and three distances from the expressway.
| 0.450 | |||||||
| −0.178 | 0.047 | ||||||
| 0.292 | 0.343 | 0.419 | |||||
| 0.239 | −0.361 | 0.730 | 0.523 | ||||
| 0.455 | −0.042 | 0.449 | 0.431 | 0.429 | |||
| 0.337 | −0.089 | 0.649 | 0.569 | 0.655 | 0.900 | ||
| −0.385 | 0.419 | −0.638 | −0.590 | −0.910 | −0.434 | −0.643 | |
| −0.190 | |||||||
| −0.258 | 0.084 | ||||||
| −0.144 | 0.832 | −0.049 | |||||
| −0.329 | 0.889 | 0.159 | 0.857 | ||||
| −0.178 | 0.848 | −0.006 | 0.932 | 0.921 | |||
| −0.232 | 0.823 | 0.267 | 0.846 | 0.927 | 0.945 | ||
| 0.297 | −0.788 | −0.316 | −0.707 | −0.875 | −0.751 | −0.803 | |
| 0.536 | |||||||
| −0.209 | 0.198 | ||||||
| −0.449 | −0.229 | 0.453 | |||||
| −0.865 | −0.384 | 0.487 | 0.548 | ||||
| 0.209 | 0.445 | 0.010 | 0.312 | 0.045 | |||
| −0.864 | −0.461 | 0.469 | 0.571 | 0.929 | −0.018 | ||
| 0.927 | 0.405 | −0.148 | −0.361 | −0.803 | 0.252 | −0.252 | |
EC = electrical conductivity; * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed); ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed).
Geo-accumulation index and pollution index values of analyzed metals in topsoil from Warsaw Expressway (E30).
| Section | Zn | Pb | Cd | Ni | Cu | Zn | Pb | Cd | Ni | Cu |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 2.33 | 1.89 | 1.24 | 1.34 | 1.15 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| B | 0.52 | 1.14 | 1.20 | 0.41 | −0.35 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| C | −1.57 | 0.40 | 0.74 | −0.02 | −1.65 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Mean | 0.43 | 1.14 | 1.06 | 0.58 | −0.28 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| A | 7.68 | 5.69 | 3.57 | 4.22 | 3.85 | High | High | High | High | High |
| B | 2.35 | 3.77 | 3.57 | 2.04 | 1.33 | Middle | High | High | Middle | Middle |
| C | 0.53 | 2.28 | 2.59 | 1.50 | 0.50 | Low | Middle | Middle | Middle | Low |
| Mean | 3.52 | 3.91 | 3.25 | 2.59 | 1.90 | High | High | High | Middle | Middle |