| Literature DB >> 22754468 |
Fan Zhang1, Xuedong Yan, Chen Zeng, Man Zhang, Suraj Shrestha, Lochan Prasad Devkota, Tandong Yao.
Abstract
Emission of heavy metals from traffic activities is an important pollution source to roadside farmland ecosystems. However, little previous research has been conducted to investigate heavy metal concentrations of roadside farmland soil in mountainous areas. Owing to more complex roadside environments and more intense driving conditions on mountainous highways, heavy metal accumulation and distribution patterns in farmland soil due to traffic activity could be different from those on plain highways. In this study, design factors including altitude, roadside distance, terrain, and tree protection were considered to analyze their influences on Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb concentrations in farmland soils along a mountain highway around Kathmandu, Nepal. On average, the concentrations of Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb at the sampling sites are lower than the tolerable levels. Correspondingly, pollution index analysis does not show serious roadside pollution owing to traffic emissions either. However, some maximum Zn, Cd, and Pb concentrations are close to or higher than the tolerable level, indicating that although average accumulations of heavy metals pose no hazard in the region, some spots with peak concentrations may be severely polluted. The correlation analysis indicates that either Cu or Cd content is found to be significantly correlated with Zn and Pb content while there is no significant correlation between Cu and Cd. The pattern can be reasonably explained by the vehicular heavy metal emission mechanisms, which proves the heavy metals' homology of the traffic pollution source. Furthermore, the independent factors show complex interaction effects on heavy metal concentrations in the mountainous roadside soil, which indicate quite a different distribution pattern from previous studies focusing on urban roadside environments. It is found that the Pb concentration in the downgrade roadside soil is significantly lower than that in the upgrade soil while the Zn concentration in the downgrade roadside soil is marginally higher than in the upgrade soil; and the concentrations of Cu and Pb in the roadside soils with tree protection are significantly lower than those without tree protection. However, the attenuation pattern of heavy metal concentrations as a function of roadside distance within a 100 m range cannot be identified consistently.Entities:
Keywords: Nepal; heavy metal (Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb); mountainous highway; roadside farmland soil
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22754468 PMCID: PMC3386583 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph9051715
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Sampling locations and altitudes along Trishuli Highway between Trishuli City and Kathmadu, Nepal.
Description of four independent variables for MANOVA analysis.
| Independent Variable | Variable Definition | Discrete Level |
|---|---|---|
| Altitude | Elevation above mean sea level. Six levels are designated along the Trishuli Highway. | Level 1: 800 m |
| Level 2: 1,000 m | ||
| Level 3: 1,200 m | ||
| Level 4: 1,400 m | ||
| Level 5: 1,600 m | ||
| Level 6: 1,800 m | ||
| Distance | Distance from the soil sampling location perpendicular to the road edge. Five distances are designated. | Level 1: 0 m |
| Level 2: 10 m | ||
| Level 3: 30 m | ||
| Level 4: 50 m | ||
| Level 5: 100 m | ||
| Terrain | Roadside farmland slope direction. Upgrade or downgrade is used to describe whether the roadside farmland gradually arise or going down from the road surface. | Level 1: Upgrade—farmland elevation gradually increases from the road surface. |
| Level 2: Downgrade—farmland elevation gradually decreases from the road surface. | ||
| Tree | Tree is designated to describe whether there are trees growing along the road edge or not, and test whether the trees can protect the farmland soil from metal pollution. | Level 1: Tree—Trees exist between farmland and roads and the trees’ continues distance is at least 30m along the road direction. |
| Level 2: No Tree—There are no trees between farmland and road. |
Sample distribution cross-tabulation by Altitude × Distance × Tree × Terrain.
| Grade | Tree | Distance | Altitude (m) | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 800 | 1,000 | 1,200 | 1,400 | 1,600 | 1,800 | ||||
| Down grade | No tree | 0 m | 3 | 3 | 3 | - | 3 | 3 | 15 |
| 10 m | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 18 | ||
| 30 m | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 18 | ||
| 50 m | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 21 | ||
| 100 m | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 18 | ||
| Tree | 0 m | 3 | 3 | - | 3 | 3 | 3 | 15 | |
| 10 m | 3 | 3 | - | 3 | 3 | 3 | 15 | ||
| 30 m | 3 | 3 | - | 3 | 3 | 3 | 15 | ||
| 50 m | 3 | 3 | - | 3 | 3 | 3 | 15 | ||
| 100 m | 3 | 3 | - | 3 | 3 | 3 | 15 | ||
| Up grade | No tree | 0 m | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 18 |
| 10 m | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 18 | ||
| 30 m | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 18 | ||
| 50 m | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 18 | ||
| 100 m | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 18 | ||
| Tree | 0 m | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 18 | |
| 10 m | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 18 | ||
| 30 m | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 18 | ||
| 50 m | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 18 | ||
| 100 m | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | - | 3 | 15 | ||
| Total | 60 | 60 | 45 | 57 | 57 | 63 | 342 | ||
Figure 2Illustration of sampling method. Three sets of samples are collected in three sampling regions at each sampling location. In each sample region, five samples are taken with five sampling distances to the highway edge. For each sample, 8–10 sub-samples were taken in an ‘S-shape’ pattern and evenly mixed.
Descriptive statistical results of heavy metal concentrations (mg/kg) in mountainous rural roadside farmland topsoil.
| Variable | Level | N | Cu | Zn | Cd | Pb | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | S.D. | Max | Mean | S.D. | Max | Mean | S.D. | Max | Mean | S.D. | Max | |||
| Altitude | 800 m | 60 | 18.01 | 5.29 | 32.4 | 60.57 | 55.61 | 300 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 1.81 | 34.75 | 40.3 | 210 |
| 1,000 m | 60 | 22.17 | 4.68 | 30 | 97.63 | 57.12 | 436 | 0.54 | 0.72 | 4.97 | 30.15 | 24.83 | 146 | |
| 1,200 m | 45 | 17.08 | 4.2 | 31 | 77.61 | 32.46 | 159 | 0.36 | 0.41 | 1.75 | 14.97 | 11.21 | 51.8 | |
| 1,400 m | 57 | 13.73 | 6.05 | 31.3 | 38.78 | 20.17 | 120 | 0.35 | 0.39 | 1.87 | 10.4 | 8.57 | 40.2 | |
| 1,600 m | 57 | 23.15 | 6.2 | 44.5 | 93.64 | 60.49 | 404 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 1.25 | 19.19 | 15.28 | 86 | |
| 1,800 m | 63 | 24.66 | 7.26 | 45.8 | 88.27 | 48.14 | 272 | 0.3 | 0.45 | 3.07 | 23.26 | 15.22 | 83.2 | |
| Distance | 0 m | 66 | 19.75 | 7.11 | 45.8 | 69.52 | 37.85 | 179 | 0.38 | 0.37 | 1.75 | 28.83 | 37.16 | 210 |
| 10 m | 69 | 19.98 | 6.58 | 38 | 81.28 | 62.1 | 404 | 0.35 | 0.44 | 1.87 | 22.91 | 21.7 | 128 | |
| 30 m | 69 | 20.53 | 7.11 | 44.5 | 81.74 | 59.23 | 436 | 0.36 | 0.4 | 1.81 | 22.23 | 19.62 | 94.3 | |
| 50 m | 72 | 19.32 | 7.59 | 36.5 | 71.42 | 46.55 | 272 | 0.36 | 0.7 | 4.97 | 17.67 | 14.49 | 83.2 | |
| 100 m | 66 | 20.39 | 6.14 | 31.9 | 77.49 | 53.35 | 308 | 0.33 | 0.28 | 1.14 | 21.67 | 20.04 | 95.8 | |
| Terrain | Down | 165 | 19.77 | 6.98 | 45.8 | 85.26 | 63.28 | 436 | 0.34 | 0.4 | 3.07 | 18.23 | 13.97 | 86 |
| Up | 177 | 20.18 | 6.85 | 41.4 | 67.94 | 38.36 | 230 | 0.37 | 0.51 | 4.97 | 26.62 | 29.71 | 210 | |
| Tree | No tree | 180 | 22.05 | 7.61 | 45.8 | 83.18 | 56.9 | 436 | 0.34 | 0.41 | 3.07 | 23.71 | 27.91 | 210 |
| Tree | 162 | 17.69 | 5.16 | 32.4 | 68.65 | 46.21 | 300 | 0.37 | 0.52 | 4.97 | 21.31 | 18.22 | 95.8 | |
| For All Samples | 342 | 19.99 | 6.91 | 45.8 | 76.3 | 52.54 | 436 | 0.36 | 0.46 | 4.97 | 22.57 | 23.81 | 210 | |
Descriptive statistical results of heavy metal concentrations comparison between roadside samples and local background values.
| Variable | Level | Pi _Cu | Pi _Zn | Pi _Cd | Pi _Pb | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Max | Mean | Max | Mean | Max | Mean | Max | ||
| Altitude | 800 m | 0.89 | 1.64 | 1.09 | 5.29 | 1.06 | 5.51 | 1.35 |
|
| 1,000 m | 0.94 | 1.20 | 1.34 |
| 1.46 |
| 1.19 | 5.57 | |
| 1,200 m | 0.96 | 1.76 | 1.15 | 2.30 | 1.22 | 5.73 | 1.02 | 3.51 | |
| 1,400 m | 0.83 | 1.87 | 1.16 | 3.48 | 1.17 | 6.15 | 1.14 | 4.28 | |
| 1,600 m | 1.03 | 1.97 | 0.77 | 3.47 | 0.86 | 4.46 | 0.57 | 1.77 | |
| 1,800 m | 1.09 |
| 0.68 | 2.28 | 0.80 | 8.65 | 1.01 | 3.62 | |
| Distance | 0 m | 0.94 |
| 0.91 | 2.30 | 1.13 | 5.73 | 1.21 |
|
| 10 m | 0.97 | 1.87 | 1.12 | 5.29 | 1.05 | 6.15 | 1.10 | 4.73 | |
| 30 m | 1.00 | 1.97 | 1.15 |
| 1.10 | 4.67 | 1.04 | 3.51 | |
| 50 m | 0.92 | 1.61 | 0.91 | 3.00 | 1.07 |
| 0.85 | 3.62 | |
| Terrain | Down | 0.95 |
| 1.13 |
| 1.00 | 8.65 | 0.88 | 4.28 |
| Up | 0.96 | 1.80 | 0.92 | 3.00 | 1.16 |
| 1.20 |
| |
| Tree | No tree | 1.05 |
| 1.07 |
| 1.05 | 8.65 | 1.13 |
|
| Tree | 0.86 | 1.76 | 0.96 | 5.29 | 1.13 |
| 0.96 | 3.51 | |
Correlation analysis of the dependent variables.
| Cu | Zn | Cd | Pb | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu | 1.000 | 0.375 ** | 0.092 | 0.259 ** |
| Zn | 1.000 | 0.202 ** | 0.217 ** | |
| Cd | 1.000 | 0.307 ** | ||
| Pb | 1.000 |
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
MANOVA result for metal concentrations of Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb.
| Source | df | Cu | Zn | Cd | Pb | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | Sig. | F | Sig. | F | Sig. | F | Sig. | ||
| Altitude | 5 | 23.916 | 0.000 ** | 6.525 | 0.000 ** | 2.378 | 0.039 * | 11.127 | 0.000 ** |
| Terrain | 1 | 0.344 | 0.558 | 3.846 | 0.051 | 1.719 | 0.191 | 13.898 | 0.000 ** |
| Tree | 1 | 15.136 | 0.000 ** | 1.772 | 0.184 | 0.027 | 0.869 | 5.931 | 0.015 * |
| Distance | 4 | 0.164 | 0.686 | 0.005 | 0.942 | 0.391 | 0.532 | 1.761 | 0.185 |
| Altitude × Distance | 20 | 1.878 | 0.098 | 2.193 | 0.055 | 0.433 | 0.826 | 2.966 | 0.012 * |
| Altitude × Terrain | 5 | 1.790 | 0.115 | 0.508 | 0.770 | 2.171 | 0.057 | 10.100 | 0.000 ** |
| Altitude × Tree | 5 | 14.348 | 0.000 ** | 5.430 | 0.000 ** | 0.895 | 0.484 | 5.896 | 0.000 ** |
| Terrain × Distance | 4 | 3.683 | 0.056 | 1.172 | 0.280 | 0.657 | 0.418 | 3.827 | 0.051 |
| Tree × Distance | 4 | 1.413 | 0.236 | 0.158 | 0.691 | 0.089 | 0.766 | 8.423 | 0.004 * |
| Terrain × Tree | 1 | 0.217 | 0.641 | 5.097 | 0.025 * | 2.362 | 0.125 | 2.284 | 0.132 |
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed); ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Figure 3Variations in soil heavy metal concentrations with altitude.
Figure 4Variation in soil heavy metal concentrations with terrain.
Figure 5Variation in soil heavy metal concentrations with tree protection.
Figure 6Interaction between altitude and tree.
Figure 7Variation in soil heavy metal concentrations with distance.