| Literature DB >> 23439515 |
Xuedong Yan1, Dan Gao, Fan Zhang, Chen Zeng, Wang Xiang, Man Zhang.
Abstract
This study investigated the spatial distribution of copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), chromium (Cr), cobalt (Co), nickel (Ni) and arsenic (As) in roadside topsoil in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and evaluated the potential environmental risks of these roadside heavy metals due to traffic emissions. A total of 120 topsoil samples were collected along five road segments in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. The nonlinear regression method was used to formulize the relationship between the metal concentrations in roadside soils and roadside distance. The Hakanson potential ecological risk index method was applied to assess the degrees of heavy metal contaminations. The regression results showed that both of the heavy metals' concentrations and their ecological risk indices decreased exponentially with the increase of roadside distance. The large R square values of the regression models indicate that the exponential regression method can suitably describe the relationship between heavy metal accumulation and roadside distance. For the entire study region, there was a moderate level of potential ecological risk within a 10 m roadside distance. However, Cd was the only prominent heavy metal which posed potential hazard to the local soil ecosystem. Overall, the rank of risk contribution to the local environments among the eight heavy metals was Cd > As > Ni > Pb > Cu > Co > Zn > Cr. Considering that Cd is a more hazardous heavy metal than other elements for public health, the local government should pay special attention to this traffic-related environmental issue.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23439515 PMCID: PMC3709283 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph10030762
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1The sampling site distribution in the study area.
The relationship of Eri, RI and pollution degree.
| Eri | Pollution Degree | RI | Pollution Degree |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eri < 40 | low potential ecological risk | RI < 150 | low ecological risk |
| 40 ≤ Eri < 80 | moderate potential ecological risk | 150 ≤ RI < 300 | moderate ecological risk |
| 80 ≤ Eri < 160 | considerable potential ecological risk | 300 ≤ RI < 600 | considerable ecological risk |
| 160 ≤ Eri < 320 | high potential ecological risk | RI ≥ 600 | very high ecological risk |
| Eri > 320 | very high ecological risk |
Concentrations of roadside soil heavy metals on different road segments.
| Road Segment | Site | Concentrations (mg·kg−1) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu | Zn | Cd | Pb | Cr | Co | Ni | As | ||
| Xining To Maduo | 1 | 28.33 | 101.10 | 0.35 | 24.58 | 36.37 | 10.01 | 26.66 | 23.52 |
| 2 | 28.88 | 81.57 | 0.23 | 18.73 | 38.84 | 10.61 | 29.47 | 17.35 | |
| 3 | 25.03 | 85.75 | 0.26 | 20.64 | 36.35 | 10.14 | 27.76 | 16.25 | |
| 4 | 25.59 | 88.71 | 0.24 | 20.85 | 40.03 | 10.56 | 29.58 | 19.45 | |
| Mean | 26.96 | 89.28 | 0.27 | 21.20 | 37.90 | 10.33 | 28.37 | 19.14 | |
| Maduo To Qumalai | 5 | 20.43 | 87.08 | 0.20 | 19.07 | 32.85 | 10.05 | 28.67 | 18.17 |
| 6 | 21.09 | 97.30 | 0.17 | 15.86 | 41.46 | 8.70 | 31.29 | 14.37 | |
| 7 | 23.35 | 93.15 | 0.28 | 20.97 | 37.06 | 10.51 | 30.35 | 23.07 | |
| 8 | 19.11 | 87.87 | 0.20 | 17.88 | 26.24 | 8.94 | 26.43 | 16.09 | |
| 9 | 26.39 | 116.83 | 0.23 | 25.15 | 38.10 | 14.54 | 37.61 | 27.74 | |
| 10 | 23.75 | 96.81 | 0.22 | 23.01 | 35.07 | 11.78 | 32.32 | 23.47 | |
| Mean | 22.35 | 96.51 | 0.22 | 20.32 | 35.13 | 10.75 | 31.11 | 20.49 | |
| Qumalai To Budongquan | 11 | 23.48 | 93.40 | 0.23 | 22.38 | 34.49 | 11.14 | 35.32 | 22.97 |
| 12 | 26.33 | 106.47 | 0.27 | 23.41 | 31.78 | 11.06 | 31.51 | 23.95 | |
| 13 | 17.41 | 79.98 | 0.19 | 17.19 | 29.83 | 8.67 | 49.74 | 16.48 | |
| Mean | 22.41 | 93.28 | 0.23 | 20.99 | 32.03 | 10.29 | 38.86 | 21.13 | |
| Budongquan To Naqu | 14 | 27.19 | 104.47 | 0.42 | 37.87 | 27.77 | 9.38 | 26.03 | 18.07 |
| 15 | 21.74 | 88.74 | 0.29 | 24.97 | 30.92 | 10.22 | 29.65 | 18.32 | |
| 16 | 25.58 | 150.78 | 0.86 | 73.55 | 36.40 | 11.01 | 31.26 | 32.39 | |
| 17 | 23.88 | 130.26 | 0.55 | 51.80 | 33.69 | 12.53 | 32.40 | 29.15 | |
| 18 | 16.39 | 82.72 | 0.32 | 27.00 | 31.76 | 8.40 | 30.31 | 18.97 | |
| Mean | 22.95 | 111.39 | 0.49 | 43.04 | 32.11 | 10.31 | 29.93 | 23.38 | |
| Naqu To Lhasa | 19 | 21.72 | 94.26 | 0.23 | 36.33 | 64.33 | 12.48 | 55.55 | 29.01 |
| 20 | 18.68 | 106.80 | 0.19 | 34.68 | 39.22 | 8.46 | 30.23 | 11.22 | |
| 21 | 24.26 | 129.35 | 0.30 | 43.77 | 44.80 | 10.22 | 34.76 | 21.80 | |
| 22 | 24.35 | 105.26 | 0.24 | 33.13 | 41.76 | 11.09 | 33.51 | 24.62 | |
| 23 | 21.40 | 116.27 | 0.44 | 38.18 | 28.59 | 8.13 | 21.67 | 25.81 | |
| 24 | 20.83 | 98.42 | 0.21 | 39.46 | 31.12 | 8.81 | 24.35 | 21.24 | |
| Mean | 21.87 | 108.39 | 0.27 | 37.59 | 41.64 | 9.87 | 33.35 | 22.28 | |
| Total | 23.13 | 100.97 | 0.30 | 29.60 | 36.20 | 10.31 | 31.93 | 21.40 | |
Figure 2Observations and regression curves of heavy metals concentrations (mg·kg−1) in roadside soils (the dash lines represent background values).
Previous studies of heavy-metal distribution patterns in roadside soils.
| Location | Study area | Heavy metals | Distribution pattern with roadside distance | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benin, Newzealand | highway | Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb, Cr, Ni | decreased rapidly | [ |
| Greater Athens Area | - | Zn, Cd, Pb, Ni | decreased exponentially and dropped to a background level at about 50 m | [ |
| France | highway | Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb, Ni, Cr | decreased rapidly | [ |
| Osogbo, Nigeria | - | Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb, Ni | decreased rapidly and reached the natural background levels at 50 m | [ |
| Nancy, France | highway | Zn, Cd, Pb | decreased | [ |
| Kampala, Uganda | highway | Zn, Cd, Pb | decreased rapidly | [ |
| Northern England | A-and B-class roads | Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb | decreased | [ |
| Beijing, China | 10 main roads | Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb, Cr, Ni, As | decreased (except for As, Cr and Ni) | [ |
| Turkey | highway | Cu, Pb, Cr | decreased (except for Cu) | [ |
| Kathmadu, Nepal | highway | Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb | irregular | [ |
| Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China | highway | Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb, Cr, Co, Ni, As | decreased exponentially |
The potential ecological risk factors and risk indices of metals based on different road segments in roadside soils.
| Road Segment | Site | Eri | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu | Zn | Cd | Pb | Cr | Co | Ni | As | RI | Degree | ||
| Xining To Maduo (X-M) | 1 | 7.16 | 1.44 | 123.29 ** | 5.49 | 1.42 | 4.24 | 5.72 | 26.72 | 175.48 | moderate |
| 2 | 7.29 | 1.17 | 83.21 ** | 4.18 | 1.52 | 4.50 | 6.32 | 19.72 | 127.91 | low | |
| 3 | 6.32 | 1.23 | 92.43 ** | 4.61 | 1.42 | 4.29 | 5.96 | 18.47 | 134.72 | low | |
| 4 | 6.46 | 1.27 | 83.93 ** | 4.65 | 1.57 | 4.47 | 6.35 | 22.10 | 130.80 | low | |
| Mean | 6.81 | 1.28 | 95.72 ** | 4.73 | 1.48 | 4.38 | 6.09 | 21.75 | 142.23 | low | |
| Maduo To Qumalai (M-Q) | 5 | 5.16 | 1.24 | 72.00 * | 4.26 | 1.29 | 4.26 | 6.15 | 20.65 | 115.01 | low |
| 6 | 5.32 | 1.39 | 61.29 * | 3.54 | 1.62 | 3.69 | 6.71 | 16.33 | 99.90 | low | |
| 7 | 5.90 | 1.33 | 98.29 ** | 4.68 | 1.45 | 4.45 | 6.51 | 26.22 | 148.83 | low | |
| 8 | 4.83 | 1.26 | 70.14 * | 3.99 | 1.03 | 3.79 | 5.67 | 18.28 | 108.99 | low | |
| 9 | 6.67 | 1.67 | 81.29 ** | 5.61 | 1.49 | 6.16 | 8.07 | 31.53 | 142.48 | low | |
| 10 | 6.00 | 1.38 | 77.71 * | 5.14 | 1.37 | 4.99 | 6.94 | 26.67 | 130.20 | low | |
| Mean | 5.65 | 1.38 | 76.79 * | 4.54 | 1.38 | 4.56 | 6.68 | 23.28 | 124.24 | low | |
| Qumalai To Budongquan (Q-B) | 11 | 5.93 | 1.33 | 82.21 ** | 5.00 | 1.35 | 4.72 | 7.58 | 26.10 | 134.23 | low |
| 12 | 6.65 | 1.52 | 96.36 ** | 5.23 | 1.24 | 4.69 | 6.76 | 27.22 | 149.67 | low | |
| 13 | 4.40 | 1.14 | 67.14 * | 3.84 | 1.17 | 3.68 | 10.67 | 18.73 | 110.76 | low | |
| Mean | 5.66 | 1.33 | 81.90 ** | 4.69 | 1.25 | 4.36 | 8.34 | 24.02 | 131.55 | low | |
| Budongquan To Naqu (B-N) | 14 | 6.87 | 1.49 | 151.71 ** | 8.45 | 1.09 | 3.98 | 5.59 | 20.54 | 199.71 | moderate |
| 15 | 5.49 | 1.27 | 103.64 ** | 5.57 | 1.21 | 4.33 | 6.36 | 20.82 | 148.70 | low | |
| 16 | 6.46 | 2.15 | 306.86 **** | 16.42 | 1.42 | 4.67 | 6.71 | 36.81 | 381.50 | considerable | |
| 17 | 6.03 | 1.86 | 197.71 *** | 11.56 | 1.32 | 5.31 | 6.95 | 33.12 | 263.87 | moderate | |
| 18 | 4.14 | 1.18 | 115.93 ** | 6.03 | 1.24 | 3.56 | 6.50 | 21.56 | 160.14 | moderate | |
| Mean | 5.80 | 1.59 | 175.17 ** | 9.61 | 1.26 | 4.37 | 6.42 | 26.57 | 230.78 | moderate | |
| Naqu To Lhasa (N-L) | 19 | 5.48 | 1.35 | 82.29 ** | 8.11 | 2.52 | 5.29 | 11.92 | 32.97 | 149.92 | low |
| 20 | 4.72 | 1.53 | 67.14 * | 7.74 | 1.53 | 3.59 | 6.49 | 12.75 | 105.48 | low | |
| 21 | 6.13 | 1.85 | 108.64 ** | 9.77 | 1.75 | 4.33 | 7.46 | 24.77 | 164.70 | moderate | |
| 22 | 6.15 | 1.50 | 84.07 ** | 7.39 | 1.63 | 4.70 | 7.19 | 27.98 | 140.63 | low | |
| 23 | 5.41 | 1.66 | 157.14 ** | 8.52 | 1.12 | 3.44 | 4.65 | 29.33 | 211.27 | moderate | |
| 24 | 5.26 | 1.41 | 74.79 * | 8.81 | 1.22 | 3.73 | 5.23 | 24.14 | 124.58 | low | |
| Mean | 5.53 | 1.55 | 95.68 ** | 8.39 | 1.63 | 4.18 | 7.16 | 25.32 | 149.43 | low | |
| Total | 5.89 | 1.426 | 105.052 | 6.392 | 1.4 | 4.37 | 6.938 | 24.188 | 155.646 | moderate | |
* Moderate risk; **considerable risk; *** high risk; **** very high risk.
Figure 3The mean risk indices based on different roadside distances of all sampling sites.