| Literature DB >> 26511975 |
Xuejiao Cheng1,2,3, Lingling Chai4,5,6, Zhaoyan Chen7,8,9, Lu Xu10,11,12, Huijie Zhai13,14,15, Aiju Zhao16, Huiru Peng17,18,19, Yingyin Yao20,21,22, Mingshan You23,24,25, Qixin Sun26,27,28, Zhongfu Ni29,30,31.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inducing mutations are considered to be an effective way to create novel genetic variations and hence novel agronomical traits in wheat. This study was conducted to assess the genetic differences between Shi4185 and its mutant line Fu4185, produced by gamma radiation with larger grain, and to identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for thousand kernel weight (TKW).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26511975 PMCID: PMC4625876 DOI: 10.1186/s12863-015-0285-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genet ISSN: 1471-2156 Impact factor: 2.797
Polymorphic SSR markers for genetic map construction
| Markers | Forward primer (5′–3′) | Reverse primer (5′–3′) | Annealing temperature (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| CCTAACCATCCAACCATAAGT | TTTCACGTACTCAAAAGTGG | 55 |
|
| GGATGTACATTGAACAGTGCT | CCCACCCTACTCACTTCAA | 55 |
|
| ACCTAAAATCTTCCCCCTACT | GCCAATTAATGCAGACTAGC | 55 |
|
| GGAAAATCATGCACACATGG | CCCCACCCTACTCACTTCAA | 58 |
|
| TGTAATCCGTCTCCTACCTTAT | GTCATACATGTCATCGGACTAC | 55 |
|
| AGTCAATGAACAGAGCCATC | CTTGACCTAGATAGGGAAACAA | 55 |
Fig. 1Phenotypic comparison of Shi4185 and Fu4185 planted at BJ-2011. a Plants at the filling stage; b Spikes at the filling stage; c Kernels after harvest
TKW (g) of Shi4185 and Fu4185 in different environments
| Environment | Sowing season | Shi4185 | Fu4185 |
|---|---|---|---|
| BJ-2011 | Autumn | 36.01 ± 0.86 | 42.82 ± 0.75** |
| HB-2012 | Autumn | 33.51 ± 1.29 | 37.14 ± 1.10* |
| SX-2012 | Autumn | 32.23 ± 1.26 | 39.44 ± 0.70** |
| BJ-2014 | Spring | 33.76 ± 1.09 | 38.79 ± 1.20** |
| SX-2014 | Spring | 29.90 ± 1.10 | 36.61 ± 1.41** |
*Indicates a significance level of P ≤ 0.05; **Indicates a significance level of P ≤ 0.01. All data are given as mean ± SD
TKW (g) of F2 and F2:3 populations in different environments
| Environment | Population | Range | Mean | SD |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJ-2011 | F2 | 25.80–54.43 | 40.83 | 4.84 |
|
| HB-2012 | F2:3 | 32.85–40.59 | 36.24 | 1.45 | 86.9 |
| SX-2012 | F2:3 | 31.56–39.85 | 35.83 | 1.75 | 88.4 |
| BJ-2014 | F2 | 20.55–47.07 | 37.56 | 3.67 |
|
| SX-2014 | F2 | 23.64–44.05 | 34.60 | 3.32 |
|
-Indicates no data
Single marker analysis of TKW in F2 and F2:3 populations
| Environment | Population | marker | b0 | b1 | −2ln (L0/L1) | F (1, | Pr (F) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJ-2011 | F2 |
| 40.94 | −2.0 | 21.27 | 22.03 | 0.000 **** |
| HB-2012 | F2:3 |
| 36.28 | −0.68 | 27.55 | 28.90 | 0.000**** |
|
| 36.26 | −0.74 | 30.89 | 32.63 | 0.000**** | ||
| SX-2012 | F2:3 |
| 35.87 | −0.73 | 21.68 | 22.47 | 0.000**** |
|
| 35.84 | −0.55 | 11.33 | 11.49 | 0.001*** |
***Indicates a significance level of P ≤ 0.001; ****Indicates a significance level of P ≤ 0.0001
Fig. 2Sequence alignment of Xbarc239 of Shi4185 and Fu4185 with wheat chromosome survey sequence
Fig. 3Locations of QTL for TKW in the F2 and F2:3 populations. QTLs with a LOD value more than 2.0 are shown on the right. The most likely intervals of the loci with LOD from top to 1.0 are shown in black
Additive effects of QTL for TKW in F2 and F2:3 populations
| Environment | Population | Marker intervala | Position (cM)b | LOD | Additive effectc | Contribution (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJ-2011 | F2 |
| 6.01 | 5.23 | −2.65 | 10.61 |
| HB-2012 | F2:3 |
| 7.81 | 2.28 | −0.45 | 2.94 |
| SX-2012 | F2:3 |
| 5.98 | 2.27 | −0.56 | 1.58 |
| BJ-2014 | F2 |
| 5.05 | 4.97 | −1.70 | 9.51 |
| SX-2014 | F2 |
| 0.00 | 2.58 | −1.43 | 14.87 |
aMarker interval is the interval containing the significant peak value of the QTL
bPosition means the distance of the significant peak value for the QTL from the first marker in the marker interval
cA positive value indicates the Fu4185 allele having a positive effect on TKW, and negative value indicates Shi4185 allele having positive effect on TKW
List of environment, flowering date, maturity date and No. of days for different daily maximum temperature a (Tmax) during grain filling
| Environment | Flowering date | Maturity date | No. of days for different Tmax during grain filling | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <30 °C | 30–34 °C | >35 °C | Sum | |||
| BJ-2011 | May 5, 2012 | June 13, 2012 | 24 | 16 | 0 | 40 |
| HB-2012 | May 1, 2013 | June 5, 2013 | 21 | 12 | 2 | 35 |
| SX-2012 | May 5, 2013 | June 9, 2013 | 18 | 13 | 5 | 36 |
| BJ-2014 | May 11, 2014 | June 20, 2014 | 16 | 21 | 4 | 41 |
| SX-2014 | May 15, 2014 | June 25, 2014 | 9 | 29 | 4 | 42 |
aData of Tmax from individual year of each environment (http://www.tianqi.com/)
Fig. 4Physical map of QTLs for TKW. The most likely intervals or associated markers of the QTL are shown in black