| Literature DB >> 26839078 |
Zhengjie Li1,2, Mailan Liu3, Lei Lan1, Fang Zeng1, Nikos Makris4,5, Yilin Liang6, Taipin Guo1, Feng Wu1, Yujie Gao1, Mingkai Dong1, Jie Yang1, Ying Li1, Qiyong Gong7, Fanrong Liang1, Jian Kong4,5.
Abstract
The aims of this study were to 1) compare resting state functional connectivity (rs-fc) of the periaqueductal gray (PAG), a key region in the descending pain modulatory system (DPMS) between migraine without aura (MwoA) patients and healthy controls (HC), and 2) investigate how an effective treatment can influence the PAG rs-fc in MwoA patients. One hundred MwoA patients and forty-six matched HC were recruited. Patients were randomized to verum acupuncture, sham acupuncture, and waiting list groups. Resting state fMRI data were collected and seed based functional connectivity analysis was applied. Compared with HC, MwoA patients showed reduced rs-fc between the PAG and rostral anterior cingulate cortex/medial prefrontal cortex (rACC/mPFC), key regions in the DPMS and other pain related brain regions. The reduced rs-fc between the PAG and rACC/mPFC was associated with increased migraine headache intensity at the baseline. After treatments, rs-fc between the PAG and the rACC in MwoA patients significantly increased. The changes of rs-fc among the PAG, rACC and ventral striatum were significantly associated with headache intensity improvement. Impairment of the DPMS is involved in the neural pathophysiology of migraines. Impaired DPMS in migraine patients can be normalized after effective treatment.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26839078 PMCID: PMC4738255 DOI: 10.1038/srep20298
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Study flow chat.
HC, healthy controls; VA, verum acupuncture; SA, sham acupuncture; WT, waiting-list.
Figure 2Acupoints location.
Baseline characteristics of MwoA patients (subjects completed two MRI scans with completed MRI data) in different group and healthy controls.
| Characteristics | VA1, n = 11 | VA2, n = 11 | VA3, n = 13 | SA, n = 11 | WT, n = 16 | P value | MwoA, n = 62 | HC, n = 42 | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female n(%) | 9 (81.8%) | 8 (72.7%) | 10 (77.2%) | 9 (81.8%) | 12 (77.5%) | 0.979 | 48 (77.4%) | 34 (81.0%) | 0.808 |
| Age (y) Mean (95%CI) | 21.73 (20.56; 22.89) | 21.18 (19.69; 22.67) | 21.00 (19.98; 22.02) | 21.18 (20.52; 21.84) | 21.38 (20.33; 22.42) | 0.889 | 21.29 (20.85; 21.73) | 21.21 (20.93; 21.49) | 0.771 |
| Height (cm) Mean (95%CI) | 158.00 (153.65; 162.35) | 163.45 (158.25; 168.67) | 159.69 (155.35; 164.04) | 157.00 (154.00; 160.00) | 162.63 (157.60; 167.65) | 0.163 | 160.34 (158.40; 162.28) | 161.00 (159.23; 162.77) | 0.633 |
| Weight (kg) Mean (95%CI) | 51.64 (47.22; 56.05) | 56.27 (48.61; 63.93) | 50.73 (47.94; 53.52) | 48.27 (45.91; 50.64) | 53.94 (48.58; 59.29) | 0.164 | 52.27 (50.19; 54.34) | 50.98 (49.12; 52.84) | 0.382 |
| Duration (mo) Mean (95%CI) | 62.91 (43.91; 81.84) | 68.91 (39.88; 97.93) | 67.38 (45.44; 89.33) | 58.00 (39.94; 76.06) | 73.31 (53.15; 93.47) | 0.843 | – | – | – |
| Headache intensity Mean (95%CI) | 5.45 (4.54; 6.37) | 5.32 (4.68; 5.96) | 5.69 (5.12; 6.26) | 5.18 (4.19; 6.17) | 5.66 (5.16; 6.15) | 0.765 | – | – | – |
| Headache frequency Mean (95%CI) | 5.91 (3.88; 7.93) | 7.45 (5.03; 9.88) | 5.54 (3.35; 7.72) | 6.45 (4.34; 8.57) | 4.31 (2.91; 5.71) | 0.152 | – | – | – |
| SAS score Mean (95%CI) | 45.05 (39.72; 50.37) | 45.27 (39.71; 50.83) | 46.75 (40.50; 53.00) | 45.68 (40.35; 51.01) | 46.81 (41.52; 52.11) | 0.980 | – | – | – |
| SDS score Mean (95%CI) | 42.41 (34.55; 50.27) | 50.86 (45.14; 56.59) | 43.90 (36.43; 51.38) | 44.27 (37.41; 51.14) | 47.34 (42.48; 52.21) | 0.326 | – | – | – |
HC, healthy controls; MwoA, migraine without aura; VA, verum acupuncture; SA, sham acupuncture group; SAS, self-rating anxiety scale; SDS, self-rating depression scale; WT, waiting-list; *, χ2 test was applied for gender comparison, one-way ANOVA was applied for the rest comparisions, among VA1, VA2, VA3, SA and WT groups; **, χ2 test was applied for gender comparison, two-sample t test was applied for the rest comparisions, between MwoA and HC.
Therapeutic effect in different groups.
| Outcome measures | VA1, n = 11 | VA2, n = 11 | VA3, n = 13 | SA, n = 11 | WT, n = 16 | AG, n = 46 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headache intensity Mean (95%CI) | ||||||
| Baseline | 5.45 (4.54; 6.37) | 5.32 (4.68; 5.96) | 5.69 (5.12; 6.26) | 5.18 (4.19; 6.17) | 5.66 (5.16; 6.15) | 5.42 (5.08; 5.77) |
| End of treatment | 3.18 (2.24; 4.12) | 3.73 (2.82; 4.63) | 3.15 (2.31; 3.99) | 4.04 (3.09; 5.00) | 5.72 (4.84; 6.59) | 3.51 (3.10;3.93) |
| P value | 0.003 | 0.002 | 0.000 | 0.158 | 0.861 | 0.000 |
| Headache frequency Mean (95%CI) | ||||||
| Baseline | 5.91 (3.88; 7.93) | 7.45 (5.03; 9.88) | 5.54 (3.35; 7.72) | 6.45 (4.34; 8.57) | 4.31 (2.91; 5.71) | 6.30 (5.31; 7.30) |
| End of treatment | 4.18 (2.60; 5.77) | 6.18 (4.13; 8.03) | 4.08 (2.40; 5.76) | 6.45 (3.97; 8.94) | 8.63 (6.14; 11.11) | 5.17 (4.27; 6.08) |
| P value | 0.029 | 0.111 | 0.038 | 0.999 | 0.000 | 0.009 |
| SAS score Mean (95%CI) | ||||||
| Baseline | 45.05 (39.72; 50.37) | 45.27 (39.71; 50.83) | 46.75 (40.50; 53.00) | 45.68 (40.35; 51.01) | 46.81 (41.52; 52.11) | 45.73 (43.21; 48.26) |
| End of treatment | 39.20 (31.93; 46.48) | 41.77 (36.43; 47.11) | 37.96 (31.68; 44.25) | 38.02 (32.97; 43.08) | 41.64 (37.76; 45.52) | 39.18 (36.46; 41.91) |
| P value | 0.101 | 0.180 | 0.015 | 0.081 | 0.040 | 0.000 |
| SDS score Mean (95%CI) | ||||||
| Baseline | 42.41 (34.55; 50.27) | 50.86 (45.14; 56.59) | 43.90 (36.43; 51.38) | 44.27 (37.41; 51.14) | 47.34 (42.48; 52.21) | 45.30 (42.03; 48.57) |
| End of treatment | 41.93 (33.11; 50.75) | 43.86 (36.67; 51.05) | 38.92 (32.31; 45.53) | 37.34 (30.69; 43.98) | 41.25 (35.99; 46.51) | 40.45 (37.14; 43.75) |
| P value | 0.832 | 0.071 | 0.070 | 0.118 | 0.065 | 0.003 |
AG, acupuncture group, verum acupuncture + sham acupuncture; VA, verum acupuncture; SA, sham acupuncture group; SAS, self-rating anxiety scale; SDS, self-rating depression scale; WT, waiting list. Pair-t test was applied for comparisons in each group.
Comparisons of the therapeutic effects between different groups.
| Outcome measures | VA1, n = 11 | VA2, n = 11 | VA3, n = 13 | SA, n = 11 | P value | WT, n = 16 | AG, n = 46 | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headache intensity Mean (95%CI) | ||||||||
| End of treatment | 3.18 (2.24; 4.12) | 3.73 (2.82; 4.63) | 3.15 (2.31; 3.99) | 4.04 (3.09; 5.00) | 0.351 | 5.72 (4.84; 6.59) | 3.51 (3.10;3.93) | 0.000 |
| End-baseline | −2.27 (−3.55; −0.99) | −1.59 (−2.42; −0.75) | −2.54 (−3.41; −1.66) | −1.14 (−2.80; 0.52) | 0.242 | 0.06 (−0.68; 0.81) | −1.91 (−2.46; −1.37) | 0.000 |
| Headache frequency Mean (95%CI) | ||||||||
| End of treatment | 4.18 (2.60; 5.77) | 6.18 (4.13; 8.03) | 4.08 (2.40; 5.76) | 6.45 (3.97; 8.94) | 0.107 | 8.63 (6.14; 11.11) | 5.17 (4.27; 6.08) | 0.012 |
| End-baseline | −1.73 (−3.23; −0.22) | −1.27 (−2.89; 0.35) | −1.46 (−2.83; −0.10) | 0.00 (−2.75; 2.75) | 0.493 | 4.31 (2.26; 6.37) | −1.13 (−1.97; −0.29) | 0.000 |
| SAS score Mean (95%CI) | ||||||||
| End of treatment | 39.20 (31.93; 46.48) | 41.77 (36.43; 47.11) | 37.96 (31.68; 44.25) | 38.02 (32.97; 43.08) | 0.745 | 41.64 (37.76; 45.52) | 39.18 (36.46; 41.91) | 0.336 |
| End-baseline | −5.84 (−13.05; 1.37) | −3.50 (−8.91; 1.91) | −8.79 (−15.54; −2.04) | −7.66 (−16.46; 1.14) | 0.670 | −5.17 (−10.07; −0.27) | −6.55 (−9.74; −3.36) | 0.649 |
| SDS score Mean (95%CI) | ||||||||
| End of treatment | 41.93 (33.11; 50.75) | 43.86 (36.67; 51.05) | 38.92 (32.31; 45.53) | 37.34 (30.69; 43.98) | 0.520 | 41.25 (35.99; 46.51) | 40.45 (37.14; 43.75) | 0.799 |
| End-baseline | −0.48 (−5.35; 4.40) | −7.00 (−14.72; 0.72) | −4.98 (−10.44; 0.48) | −6.93 (−15.95; 2.09) | 0.432 | −6.09 (−12.61; 0.42) | −4.85 (−7.96; −1.74) | 0.697 |
AG, acupuncture groups; HC, healthy controls; VA, verum acupuncture; SA, sham acupuncture; SAS, self-rating anxiety scale; SDS, self-rating depression scale; WT, waiting list; *, one-way ANOVA was applied for the comparisions among VA1, VA2, VA3, SA and WT groups; **, two-sample t test was applied for the comparisions between MwoA and HC.
Figure 3Altered resting state-functional connectivity in MwoA patients and the modulation effect of acupuncture treament (verum + sham).
(A) Brain regions showed reduced resting state-functional connectivity with the vlPAG in MwoA patients, compared to healthy controls. (B) Brain regions showed reduced resting state-functional connectivity with vlPAG is associated with increased headache intensity as indicated by VAS scores in MwoA patients. (C) Partial regression between headache intensity and rs-fc value in MwoA patients (controlled for disease duration, SAS and SDS). (D) Acupuncture treatment normalized impaired vlPAG resting state-functional connectivity in MwoA patients. (E) Brain regions showed overlap between A and C. (F) The Fisher-z value of the overlap rACC in healthy controls and MwoA patients before and after acupuncture treatment respectively (mean ± SE). L, left side; MwoA, migraine without aura; rACC, rostral anterior cingulate cortex; mPFC, medial prefrontal cortex; R, right side; VAS, visual analogue scale; vlPAG, ventrolateral periaqueductal gray.
The vlPAG resting state functional connectivity in MwoA patients and the changes in different groups.
| vlPAG resting state-functional connectivity difference between MwoA patients in baseline and healthy controls | Changes of vlPAG resting state-functional connectivity in MwoA patients due to acupuncture treatment (verum + sham) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contrast | Voxels | Brain Region | MNI (x, y, z) | Z | Contrast | Voxels | Brain Region | MNI (x, y, z) | Z | ||||
| HC>MwoA | 297 | L OFC | −3 | 63 | −18 | 5.81 | Post>Pre | 408 | L MCC | −3 | 27 | 24 | 3.51 |
| L mPFC | −6 | 54 | −12 | 3.91 | L mPFC | −9 | 51 | −6 | 3.18 | ||||
| L rACC | −12 | 48 | 3 | 2.84 | L rACC | −12 | 51 | 9 | 3.63 | ||||
| R mPFC | 6 | 57 | −9 | 3.41 | R MCC | 3 | 18 | 15 | 4.29 | ||||
| 196 | L OFC | −36 | 21 | −21 | 4.34 | R rACC | 3 | 39 | 15 | 3.31 | |||
| MwoA>HC | 236 | Bilateral PAG | 3 | −30 | −15 | 3.55 | Pre >Post | No brain region above the threshold | |||||
| AG >WT | 501 | L MCC | 0 | 27 | 12 | 4.11 | Post>Pre | No brain region above the threshold | |||||
| L mPFC | −6 | 54 | −6 | 3.24 | Pre>Post | 221 | L Inf Parietal Lob | −39 | −45 | 42 | 3.74 | ||
| L rACC | −12 | 51 | 6 | 3.98 | L Precuneus | −33 | −63 | 45 | 3.72 | ||||
| R rACC | 6 | 39 | 15 | 3.58 | L Angular gyrus | −33 | −57 | 39 | 3.29 | ||||
| WT>AG | No brain region above the threshold | ||||||||||||
AG, acupuncture treatment group; L, left side; MCC, middle cingulate cortex; mPFC, medial prefrontal cortex; MwoA, migraine without aura; OFC, orbitofrontal cortex; rACC, rostral anterior cingulate cortex; R, right side; SMA, supplementary motor area; VA, verum acupuncture; VAS, visual analogue scale; vlPAG, ventrolateral periaqueductal gray; WT, waiting-list.
The association between vlPAG resting state-functional connectivity and VAS.
| Association between baseline VAS and baseline vlPAG resting state-functional connectivity in all MwoA patients | Association between VAS changes and vlPAG resting state-functional connectivity changes due to acupuncture treatment (verum + sham) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contrast | Voxels | Brain Region | MNI (x, y, z) | Z | Contrast | Voxels | Brain Region | MNI (x, y, z) | Z | ||||
| Negative | 226 | L mPFC/rACC | −6 | 54 | −3 | 3.73 | Negative | 523 | L MCC/rACC | −12 | 36 | 21 | 3.13 |
| L Sup Frontal gyrus | −24 | 42 | 27 | 3.77 | |||||||||
| R MCC/rACC | 15 | 48 | 21 | 3.88 | |||||||||
| R SMA/preSMA | 12 | 9 | 66 | 4.21 | |||||||||
| R Mid Frontal gyrus | 27 | 42 | 27 | 3.76 | |||||||||
| 296 | L Putamen | −18 | 15 | 0 | 4.71 | ||||||||
| L Caudate | −9 | 0 | 15 | 4.57 | |||||||||
| L Thalamus | −15 | −12 | 9 | 3.57 | |||||||||
| 300 | L Cerebellum | −9 | −57 | −54 | 4.25 | ||||||||
| Positive | No brain region above the threshold | Positive | No brain region above the threshold | ||||||||||
L, left side; MCC, middle cingulate cortex; mPFC, medial prefrontal cortex; MwoA, migraine without aura; rACC, rostral anterior cingulate cortex; R, right side; SMA, supplementary motor area; VAS, visual analogue scale; vlPAG, ventrolateral periaqueductal gray.
Figure 4vlPAG resting state-functional connectivity comparison between acupuncture treament and waiting-list.
(A) Brain regions showed greater PAG rs-fc increase (post- minus pre-treatment) in the acupuncture treatment group compared to waiting-list control. (B) Partial regression between headache intensity changes and rs-fc value changes in acupuncture group (controlled for disease duration, SAS changes and SDS changes). (C) Increased resting state-functional connectivity between the vlPAG and rACC/VSt after treatment was associated with reduced headache intensity in patients received acupuncture treatment. L, left side; MwoA, migraine without aura; rACC, rostral anterior cingulate cortex; R, right side; VAS, visual analogue scale; vlPAG, periaqueductal gray; VSt, ventral striatum. (A) Brain region showed greater PAG rs-fc increase (post- minus pre-treatment) in the verum acupuncture treatment group compared to sham acupuncture group.