| Literature DB >> 24523823 |
Ruirui Sun1, Yue Yang2, Zhengjie Li1, Ying Li1, Shirui Cheng1, Fang Zeng1.
Abstract
Acupuncture has been used to treat various disorders in China and some other eastern countries for thousands of years. Nowadays, acupuncture is gradually accepted as an alternative and complementary method in western countries for its undeniable therapeutic effects. However, its central mechanism is still unclear. It is especially difficult to reveal how different regions in the brain influence one another and how the relationship is among these regions responding to acupuncture treatment. Recently, by applying neuroimaging techniques and network theory, acupuncture studies can make further efforts to investigate the influence of acupuncture on regional cerebral functional connectivity (FC) and the modulation on "acupuncture-related" networks. Connectomics appears to be a new direction in research to further understand the central mechanism underlying acupuncture. In this paper, an overview of connectomics application in acupuncture research will be discussed, with special emphasis on present findings of acupuncture and its influence on cerebral FC. Firstly, the connectomics concept and its significance on acupuncture will be outlined. Secondly, the commonly used brain imaging techniques will be briefly introduced. Thirdly, the influence of acupuncture on FC will be discussed in greater detail. Finally, the possible direction in forthcoming research will be reviewed by analyzing the limitation of present studies.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24523823 PMCID: PMC3910072 DOI: 10.1155/2014/568429
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Studies on the acupuncture and cerebral functional connectivity.
| Author | Year | Language | Participants | Case number | Group number | Intervention | Points | Control |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qin et al. [ | 2006 | E | HS | 14 | 1 | MA | ST36 | Baseline versus after acupuncture |
| Bai et al. [ | 2007 | E | HS | 8 | 2 | MA | ST36 | Acupuncture versus sham acupuncture |
| Napadow et al. [ | 2007 | E | CTS, HS | 25 (13 CTS patients) | 2 | MA | LI-4 | Baseline versus after acupuncture |
| Qin et al. [ | 2008 | E | HS | 18 | 2 | MA | ST36 | Acupuncture versus sham acupuncture |
| Dhond et al. [ | 2008 | E | HS | 15 | 2 | MA | left PC6 | Acupuncture versus sham acupuncture |
| Zhang et al. [ | 2009 | E | HS | 36 | 3 | EA | GB 37, KI 8 | EA versus light flash stimulation |
| Liu et al. [ | 2009 | E | HS | 56 | 4 | EA | GB37, BL60, KI8, a sham point | Acupuncture versus sham acupuncture |
| Liu et al. [ | 2009 | E | HS | 28 | 2 | EA | GB37, KI8 | Puncturing at GB37 versus puncturing at K18 |
| Hui et al. [ | 2009 | E | HS | 48 | 3 | MA | LI4, ST36, LV3 | Acupuncture versus superficial tactile stimulation |
| Liu et al. [ | 2009 | C | HS | 21 | 2 | MA | ST36 | Puncturing at nonacupoints versus puncturing at ST36 |
| Long et al. [ | 2009 | C | HS | 17 | 1 | MA | ST36 | Baseline versus after acupuncture |
| Zyloney et al. [ | 2010 | E | HS | 48 | 4 | EA | LI3, LI4 | Acupuncture versus sham acupuncture |
| Qiu et al. [ | 2010 | E | HS | 38 | 2 | MA | LV3 | Female versus male |
| Ren et al. [ | 2010 | E | HS | 36 | 3 | MA | PC6, PC7, GB37 | Puncturing at PC6 versus puncturing at PC7 versus puncturing at GB37 |
| Hui et al. [ | 2010 | E | HS | 37 | 3 | MA | LI4, ST36, LV3 | Acupuncture versus sham acupuncture |
| Liu et al. [ | 2011 | E | HS | 14 | 2 | MA | ST36 | Acupuncture versus sham acupuncture |
| Feng et al. [ | 2011 | E | HS | 36 | 3 | MA | PC6, PC7, GB37 | Puncturing at PC6 versus puncturing at PC7 versus puncturing at GB37 |
| Feng et al. [ | 2011 | E | HS | 36 | 3 | MA | PC6, PC7, GB37 | Puncturing at PC6 versus puncturing at PC7 versus puncturing at GB37 |
| Feng et al. [ | 2011 | E | HS | 14 | 2 | MA | ST36 | Acupuncture versus sham acupuncture |
| Ye et al. [ | 2011 | C | HS | 10 | 1 | MA | EX-UE7 | Baseline versus after acupuncture |
| Ye et al. [ | 2011 | C | LIDP, HS | 20 (10 HS) | 2 | MA | EX-UE7 | Baseline versus after acupuncture; |
| Ye et al. [ | 2011 | C | LIDP | 10 | 1 | MA | EX-UE7 | Baseline versus after acupuncture |
| Li et al. [ | 2011 | C | HS | 9 | 1 | MA | ST36 | Baseline versus after acupuncture |
| Fang et al. [ | 2011 | C | HS | 21 | 1 | EA | RN12 | Baseline versus after acupuncture |
| Zhong et al. [ | 2012 | E | HS | 12 | 2 | MA | GB40, KI3 | Baseline versus after acupuncture; |
| You et al. [ | 2012 | E | HS | 28 | 2 | MA | ST36 | Acupuncture versus sham acupuncture |
| Jiang et al. [ | 2012 | E | HS | 40 | 2 | TEAS | TEAS versus intermittent minimal TEAS | |
| Fang et al. [ | 2012 | E | HS | 21 | 2 | EA | CV4, CV12 | Puncturing at CV4 versus puncturing at CV12 |
| Feng et al. [ | 2012 | E | MCI | 24 | 2 | MA | KI3 | Baseline versus after acupuncture |
| Li et al. [ | 2012 | C | Chronic sciatica, HS | 20 (10 HS) | 2 | EA | GB30, BL40, BL25, BL23, BL57 | Chronic sciatica patients versus HS |
| Zhao et al. [ | 2012 | C | HS | 20 | 1 | MA | LI4 | Baseline versus after acupuncture |
| Yi et al. [ | 2012 | C | Depression, HS | 39 (13 HS) | 3 | MA | LV3 | HS versus puncturing at nonacupoints in depressed patients versus puncturing at LV3 in depressed patients |
| Fang et al. [ | 2012 | C | HS | 47 | 3 | MA | LV3 | Puncturing at LV3 with deqi versus puncturing at LV3 with deqi mixed with sharp pain versus superficial tactile stimulation at LV3 |
| Dai et al. [ | 2012 | C | HS | 16 | 1 | MA | SP6 | Puncturing at nonacupoints versus puncturing at SP6 |
| Zhang et al. [ | 2013 | E | HS | 12 | 1 | EA | GV20, EX-HN3 | 5 min versus 15 min after acupuncture |
| You et al. [ | 2013 | E | HS | 28 | 2 | MA | ST36 | Acupuncture versus sham acupuncture |
| Jiang et al. [ | 2013 | E | HS | 18 | 4 | MA, EA, TEAS | ST36 | MA versus EA versus TEAS versus sensory stimulation |
| Dong et al. [ | 2013 | E | HS | 32 | 2 | NA | NA | Acupuncturist versus nonacupuncturist |
| Chen et al. [ | 2013 | E | MCI | 24 | 2 | MA | KI4 | Baseline versus after acupuncture |
| Chen et al. [ | 2013 | E | Primary hypertension | 30 | 2 | MA | GV20,GV23, EX-HN1 (Sishencong), LI4, ST36, SP6, LR3 | Baseline versus after acupuncture |
| Chen et al. [ | 2013 | C | MCI | 6 | 1 | MA | DU26 | Baseline versus after acupuncture |
E: English; C: Chinese; HS: healthy subjects; CTS: carpal tunnel syndrome; MCI: mild cognitive impairment; LIDP: lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion; MA: manual acupuncture; EA: electro-acupuncture; TEAS: transcutanclus electrical acupoint stimulation.
Figure 1