Literature DB >> 26511051

Multi-trait mimicry and the relative salience of individual traits.

Baharan Kazemi1, Gabriella Gamberale-Stille2, Olof Leimar2.   

Abstract

Mimicry occurs when one species gains protection from predators by resembling an unprofitable model species. The degree of mimic-model similarity is variable in nature and is closely related to the number of traits that the mimic shares with its model. Here, we experimentally test the hypothesis that the relative salience of traits, as perceived by a predator, is an important determinant of the degree of mimic-model similarity required for successful mimicry. We manipulated the relative salience of the traits of a two-trait artificial model prey, and subsequently tested the survival of mimics of the different traits. The unrewarded model prey had two colour traits, black and blue, and the rewarded prey had two combinations of green, brown and grey shades. Blue tits were used as predators. We found that the birds perceived the black and blue traits to be similarly salient in one treatment, and mimic-model similarity in both traits was then required for high mimic success. In a second treatment, the blue trait was the most salient trait, and mimic-model similarity in this trait alone achieved high success. Our results thus support the idea that similar salience of model traits can explain the occurrence of multi-trait mimicry.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  discrimination learning; generalization; imperfect mimicry; multicomponent signals; overshadowing; salience

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26511051      PMCID: PMC4650165          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  12 in total

1.  Theories of associative learning in animals.

Authors:  J M Pearce; M E Bouton
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Feature saltation and the evolution of mimicry.

Authors:  Gabriella Gamberale-Stille; Alexandra C V Balogh; Birgitta S Tullberg; Olof Leimar
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Stimuli that signal the absence of reinforcement are paid more attention than are irrelevant stimuli.

Authors:  Jemma C Dopson; Natalie A Williams; Guillem R Esber; John M Pearce
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  The evolution of multicomponent mimicry.

Authors:  Daniel W Franks; Thomas N Sherratt
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2006-09-23       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  The key mimetic features of hoverflies through avian eyes.

Authors:  Roderick S Bain; Arash Rashed; Verity J Cowper; Francis S Gilbert; Thomas N Sherratt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Feature theory and the two-step hypothesis of Müllerian mimicry evolution.

Authors:  Alexandra Catherine Victoria Balogh; Gabriella Gamberale-Stille; Birgitta Sillén Tullberg; Olof Leimar
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Overshadowing and stimulus intensity.

Authors:  N J Mackintosh
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  1976-05

8.  A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  J M Pearce; G Hall
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Predator cognition permits imperfect coral snake mimicry.

Authors:  David W Kikuchi; David W Pfennig
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Cognitive dimensions of predator responses to imperfect mimicry.

Authors:  Lars Chittka; Daniel Osorio
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  4 in total

1.  Biased generalization of salient traits drives the evolution of warning signals.

Authors:  Gabriella Gamberale-Stille; Baharan Kazemi; Alexandra Balogh; Olof Leimar
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  How cognitive biases select for imperfect mimicry: a study of asymmetry in learning with bumblebees.

Authors:  David W Kikuchi; Anna Dornhaus
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  Field evidence for colour mimicry overshadowing morphological mimicry.

Authors:  Alberto Corral-Lopez; Javier Edo Varg; Yiselle P Cano-Cobos; Rafael Losada; Emilio Realpe; David Outomuro
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2020-12-20       Impact factor: 5.091

4.  Mimetic accuracy and co-evolution of mimetic traits in ant-mimicking species.

Authors:  Stano Pekár; Martina Martišová; Andrea Špalek Tóthová; Charles R Haddad
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-09-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.