Literature DB >> 26508540

Patients' satisfaction with facial prostheses.

Marloes Wondergem1, George Lieben2, Shirley Bouman3, Michiel W M van den Brekel4, Peter J F M Lohuis5.   

Abstract

We assessed the "impact on wellbeing" and "satisfaction" of patients who had a facial prosthesis (of the ear, nose, or orbit) fitted in The Netherlands Cancer Institute. Patients had either an adhesive-retained or an implant-retained facial prosthesis between 1951 and 2011. We did a cross-sectional survey of 104 patients, then gave a questionnaire to the final study group of 71 (68%), a year or more later. All were satisfied with their prostheses (visual analogue scale (VAS): mean (SD) 8.1(1.5). The implant-retained group were the most satisfied (p=0.022), and the adhesive-retained group felt more self-conscious (p=0.013). Three-quarters of all patients said that the prosthesis was not painful and there were no problems with the way it functioned. A well-designed facial prosthesis has obvious benefits, but there were no appreciable differences between the two groups. Each patient must make a careful decision about which type of prosthesis to choose, taking into account the quality of their remaining tissue, the site of the defect, and their general health.
Copyright © 2015 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adhesive; facial prosthesis; osseointegrated implants; patients’ satisfaction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26508540     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.09.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  5 in total

1.  PROSTHODONTIC REHABILITATION OF MAXILLOFACIAL DEFECTS IN A NIGERIAN TEACHING HOSPITAL: A 9-YEAR REVIEW.

Authors:  T J Ogunrinde; D M Ajayi; O O Dosumu; O F Olawale; A A Olusanya
Journal:  Ann Ib Postgrad Med       Date:  2020-12

Review 2.  Prosthetics in Facial Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jaclyn Klimczak; Samuel Helman; Sameep Kadakia; Raja Sawhney; Manoj Abraham; Allison K Vest; Yadranko Ducic
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2017-05-22

Review 3.  Osseointegrated Implants and Prosthetic Reconstruction Following Skull Base Surgery.

Authors:  Shirley Hu; Demetri Arnaoutakis; Sameep Kadakia; Allison Vest; Raja Sawhney; Yadranko Ducic
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  Analysis of maxillofacial prosthetics at university dental hospitals in the capital region of Korea.

Authors:  Jee-Hwan Kim; Soo-Yeon Shin; Janghyun Paek; Jong-Ho Lee; Ho-Beom Kwon
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 5.  Outcome measures in facial prosthesis research: A systematic review.

Authors:  Rachael Y Jablonski; Benjamin J Veale; Trevor J Coward; Andrew J Keeling; Chris Bojke; Sue H Pavitt; Brian R Nattress
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.426

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.