Literature DB >> 26507115

Patterns of among- and within-species variation in heterospecific pollen receipt: The importance of ecological generalization.

Gerardo Arceo-Gómez1, Luis Abdala-Roberts2, Anneka Jankowiak1, Clare Kohler1, George A Meindl1, Carmen M Navarro-Fernández3, Víctor Parra-Tabla2, Tia-Lynn Ashman4, Conchita Alonso3.   

Abstract

PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Coflowering plants are at risk for receiving pollen from heterospecifics as well as conspecifics, yet evidence shows wide variation in the degree that heterospecific pollen transfer occurs. Evaluation of patterns and correlates of among- and within-species variation in heterospecific pollen (HP) receipt is key to understanding its importance for floral evolution and species coexistence; however, the rarity of deeply sampled multispecies comparisons has precluded such an evaluation.
METHODS: We evaluated patterns of among- and within-species variation in HP load size and diversity in 19 species across three distinct plant communities. We assessed the importance of phenotypic specialization (floral phenotype), ecological specialization (contemporary visitor assemblage), and conspecific flower density as determinants of among-species variation. We present hypotheses for different accrual patterns of HP within species based on the evenness and quality of floral visitors and evaluated these by characterizing the relationship between conspecific pollen (CP) and HP receipt. KEY
RESULTS: We found that within-species variation in HP receipt was greater than among-species and among-communities variation. Among species, ecological generalization emerged as the strongest driver of variation in HP receipt irrespective of phenotypic specialization. Within-species variation in HP load size and diversity was predicted most often from two CP-HP relationships (linear or exponentially decreasing), suggesting that two distinct types of plant-pollinator interactions prevail.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results give important insights into the potential drivers of among- and within-species variation in HP receipt. They also highlight the value of explorations of patterns at the intraspecific level, which can ultimately shed light on plant-pollinator-mediated selection in diverse plant communities.
© 2016 Botanical Society of America.

Keywords:  co-flowering community; diversity; ecological generalization; floral specialization; floral visitor assemblage; heterospecific pollen; pollinator sharing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26507115     DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1500155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bot        ISSN: 0002-9122            Impact factor:   3.844


  13 in total

1.  Diversity and composition of pollen loads carried by pollinators are primarily driven by insect traits, not floral community characteristics.

Authors:  Nevin Cullen; Jing Xia; Na Wei; Rainee Kaczorowski; Gerardo Arceo-Gómez; Elizabeth O'Neill; Rebecca Hayes; Tia-Lynn Ashman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-04-11       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Effects of spatial patterning of co-flowering plant species on pollination quantity and purity.

Authors:  James D Thomson; Hannah F Fung; Jane E Ogilvie
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Pollen on stigmas as proxies of pollinator competition and facilitation: complexities, caveats and future directions.

Authors:  Tia-Lynn Ashman; Conchita Alonso; Victor Parra-Tabla; Gerardo Arceo-Gómez
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Pollinators contribute to the maintenance of flowering plant diversity.

Authors:  Na Wei; Rainee L Kaczorowski; Gerardo Arceo-Gómez; Elizabeth M O'Neill; Rebecca A Hayes; Tia-Lynn Ashman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Causes and consequences of variation in heterospecific pollen receipt in Oenothera fruticosa.

Authors:  Gerard X Smith; Mark T Swartz; Rachel B Spigler
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  A high-throughput FTIR spectroscopy approach to assess adaptive variation in the chemical composition of pollen.

Authors:  Boris Zimmermann; Murat Bağcıoğlu; Valeria Tafinstseva; Achim Kohler; Mikael Ohlson; Siri Fjellheim
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 7.  Morphological Complexity as a Floral Signal: From Perception by Insect Pollinators to Co-Evolutionary Implications.

Authors:  Shivani Krishna; Tamar Keasar
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Pollen grain morphology is not exclusively responsible for pollen collectability in bumble bees.

Authors:  Sabine Konzmann; Sebastian Koethe; Klaus Lunau
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Global geographic patterns of heterospecific pollen receipt help uncover potential ecological and evolutionary impacts across plant communities worldwide.

Authors:  Gerardo Arceo-Gómez; Amelia Schroeder; Cristopher Albor; Tia-Lynn Ashman; Tiffany M Knight; Joanne M Bennett; Brian Suarez; Victor Parra-Tabla
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  An Unexplored Side of Regeneration Niche: Seed Quantity and Quality Are Determined by the Effect of Temperature on Pollen Performance.

Authors:  Sergey Rosbakh; Ettore Pacini; Massimo Nepi; Peter Poschlod
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.