Literature DB >> 26506270

Results of the ROADSTER multicenter trial of transcarotid stenting with dynamic flow reversal.

Christopher J Kwolek1, Michael R Jaff2, J Ignacio Leal3, L Nelson Hopkins4, Rasesh M Shah5, Todd M Hanover6, Sumaira Macdonald7, Richard P Cambria8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This report presents the 30-day results of the Safety and Efficacy Study for Reverse Flow Used During Carotid Artery Stenting Procedure (ROADSTER) multicenter trial and evaluates the safety and efficacy of ENROUTE Transcarotid NPS (Silk Road Medical Inc, Sunnyvale, Calif), a novel transcarotid neuroprotection system that provides direct surgical common carotid access and cerebral embolic protection via high-rate flow reversal during carotid artery stenting (CAS).
METHODS: A prospective, single-arm, multicenter clinical trial was performed to evaluate the use of the ENROUTE Transcarotid NPS during CAS procedures performed in patients considered to be at high risk for complications from carotid endarterectomy. Symptomatic patients with ≥50% stenosis and asymptomatic patients with ≥70% stenosis were eligible to be treated with any U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved carotid artery stent. The primary end point was the composite of all stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and death at 30 days postprocedure as defined in the Food and Drug Administration-approved study protocol. Secondary end points included cranial nerve injury; 30-day stroke, death, stroke/death, and MI; acute device, technical, and procedural success; and access site complications. All major adverse events were adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee.
RESULTS: Between November 2012 and July 2014, 208 patients were enrolled at 18 sites. Sixty-seven patients were enrolled as lead-in cases, and 141 were enrolled in the pivotal phase. In the pivotal cohort, 26% were symptomatic and 75% were asymptomatic. Acute device and technical success were 99% (140 of 141). By hierarchical analysis, the all-stroke rate in the pivotal group was 1.4% (2 of 141), stroke and death was 2.8% (4 of 141), and stroke, death and MI was 3.5% (5 of 141). One patient (0.7%) experienced postoperative hoarseness from potential Xth cranial nerve injury, which completely resolved at the 6-month follow-up visit.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the ROADSTER trial demonstrate that the use of the ENROUTE Transcarotid NPS is safe and effective at preventing stroke during CAS. The overall stroke rate of 1.4% is the lowest reported to date for any prospective, multicenter clinical trial of CAS.
Copyright © 2015 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26506270     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.04.460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  34 in total

1.  In-hospital outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization and carotid endarterectomy in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative.

Authors:  Marc L Schermerhorn; Patric Liang; Hanaa Dakour-Aridi; Vikram S Kashyap; Grace J Wang; Brian W Nolan; Jack L Cronenwett; Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen; Mahmoud B Malas
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Periprocedural Stroke and Myocardial Infarction as Risks for Long-Term Mortality in CREST.

Authors:  Michael R Jones; George Howard; Gary S Roubin; Joseph L Blackshear; David J Cohen; Donald E Cutlip; Pierre P Leimgruber; David Rhodes; Ronald J Prineas; Stephen P Glasser; Brajesh K Lal; Jenifer H Voeks; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2018-11

3.  Long-Term Mortality in Carotid Revascularization Patients.

Authors:  Shipra Arya; Saket Girotra
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2018-11

Review 4.  Interventions for Extracranial Carotid Artery Stenosis: An Update.

Authors:  Josephine F Huang; James F Meschia
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-05

Review 5.  Carotid Stenting in Neuroradiology : A Short Journey from the Past to Current Debates.

Authors:  Joachim Berkefeld; Marlies Wagner; Richard du Mesnil
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.649

6.  Lights Out: An Unusual Case of Amaurosis Fugax.

Authors:  Mark R Parsons; Michael C Stoner; Adam Doyle; Doran Mix; Scott J Cameron
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Association of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization vs Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting With Stroke or Death Among Patients With Carotid Artery Stenosis.

Authors:  Marc L Schermerhorn; Patric Liang; Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen; Jack L Cronenwett; Brian W Nolan; Vikram S Kashyap; Grace J Wang; Raghu L Motaganahalli; Mahmoud B Malas
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Anatomic eligibility for transcarotid artery revascularization and transfemoral carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Winona W Wu; Patric Liang; Thomas F X O'Donnell; Nicholas J Swerdlow; Chun Li; Mark C Wyers; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Immediate and Delayed Procedural Stroke or Death in Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis.

Authors:  Mandy D Müller; Stefanie von Felten; Ale Algra; Jean-Pierre Becquemin; Martin Brown; Richard Bulbulia; David Calvet; Hans-Henning Eckstein; Gustav Fraedrich; Alison Halliday; Jeroen Hendrikse; John Gregson; George Howard; Olav Jansen; Jean-Louis Mas; Thomas G Brott; Peter A Ringleb; Leo H Bonati
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Mandy D Müller; Philippe Lyrer; Martin M Brown; Leo H Bonati
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-02-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.