Literature DB >> 30853384

Anatomic eligibility for transcarotid artery revascularization and transfemoral carotid artery stenting.

Winona W Wu1, Patric Liang1, Thomas F X O'Donnell2, Nicholas J Swerdlow1, Chun Li1, Mark C Wyers1, Marc L Schermerhorn3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has emerged as an alternative to transfemoral carotid artery stenting (tfCAS). We investigated the proportion of carotid arteries undergoing revascularization procedures that would be eligible for TCAR based on anatomic criteria and how many arteries at high anatomic risk for tfCAS would be amenable to TCAR.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy or carotid stenting between 2012 and 2015. Patients were excluded if computed tomography angiography of the neck was not performed within 6 months of the procedure. We assessed TCAR eligibility on the basis of the instructions for use of the ENROUTE Transcarotid Neuroprotection System (Silk Road Medical, Sunnyvale, Calif) and high anatomic risk for tfCAS on the basis of anatomic factors known to make carotid cannulation more difficult or hazardous.
RESULTS: Of the 118 patients and 236 carotid arteries identified, 12 carotid arteries were excluded for presence of an occluded internal carotid artery (ICA). Of the remaining 224 carotid arteries, 72% were eligible for TCAR on the basis of the instructions for use criteria; 100% had 4- to 9-mm ICA diameters, 100% had ≥6-mm common carotid artery (CCA) diameter, 75% had ≥5-cm clavicle to carotid bifurcation distance, and 96% lacked significant CCA puncture site plaque. In addition, 7% of carotid arteries had bifurcation anatomy unfavorable for stenting; thus, of the entire cohort of arteries examined, 68% were eligible for TCAR. Hyperlipidemia (odds ratio [OR], 6.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-26; P < .01), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.5-8.3; P < .01), and older age (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1; P < .01) were independently associated with TCAR ineligibility, whereas white race (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.0-1.0; P = .048) and beta-blocker use (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.7; P < .01) were independently associated with TCAR eligibility. In addition, 24% of carotid arteries were considered to be at high risk for tfCAS for the presence of a type III aortic arch (7.6%), severe aortic calcification (3.3%), tandem CCA lesions (7.1%), moderate to severe stenosis at the carotid ostium (8.9%), and tortuous distal ICA precluding embolic filter placement (4.5%). Active smoking (OR, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.9-10; P < .01), hyperlipidemia (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.2-14; P = .03), and older age (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1; P = .02) were independently associated with tfCAS ineligibility, whereas preoperative aspirin (OR, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.0-0.4; P < .001) or clopidogrel (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.8; P = .01) use was associated with tfCAS eligibility. Of the arteries that were considered to be at high risk for tfCAS, 69% were eligible for TCAR.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of carotid arteries in individuals selected for revascularization meet TCAR eligibility, making TCAR a viable treatment option for many patients.
Copyright © 2019 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carotid artery; Eligibility; Transcarotid artery revascularization

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30853384      PMCID: PMC6478535          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.11.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  25 in total

Review 1.  Twisted blood vessels: symptoms, etiology and biomechanical mechanisms.

Authors:  Hai-Chao Han
Journal:  J Vasc Res       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 1.934

2.  Transcarotid artery revascularization versus transfemoral carotid artery stenting in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative.

Authors:  Mahmoud B Malas; Hanaa Dakour-Aridi; Grace J Wang; Vikram S Kashyap; Raghu L Motaganahalli; Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen; Jack L Cronenwett; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Aortic arch anomalies are associated with increased risk of neurological events in carotid stent procedures.

Authors:  G L Faggioli; M Ferri; A Freyrie; M Gargiulo; F Fratesi; C Rossi; L Manzoli; A Stella
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 7.069

4.  Transcarotid Artery Revascularization With Flow Reversal.

Authors:  Alper Alpaslan; Max Wintermark; László Pintér; Sumaira Macdonald; Richard Ruedy; Ralf Kolvenbach
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.487

Review 5.  Progressive Spinal Kyphosis in the Aging Population.

Authors:  Tamir Ailon; Christopher I Shaffrey; Lawrence G Lenke; James S Harrop; Justin S Smith
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  The CAPTURE registry: analysis of strokes resulting from carotid artery stenting in the post approval setting: timing, location, severity, and type.

Authors:  Ronald Fairman; William A Gray; Andrea P Scicli; Olivia Wilburn; Patrick Verta; Richard Atkinson; Jay S Yadav; Mark Wholey; L Nelson Hopkins; Rod Raabe; Stanley Barnwell; Richard Green
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Long-term comparative effectiveness of carotid stenting versus carotid endarterectomy in a large tertiary care vascular surgery practice.

Authors:  Robert P Garvin; Evan J Ryer; Andrea L Berger; James R Elmore
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2018-03-31       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 8.  Systematic Review of Guidelines for the Management of Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis.

Authors:  Anne L Abbott; Kosmas I Paraskevas; Stavros K Kakkos; Jonathan Golledge; Hans-Henning Eckstein; Larry J Diaz-Sandoval; Longxing Cao; Qiang Fu; Tissa Wijeratne; Thomas W Leung; Miguel Montero-Baker; Byung-Chul Lee; Sabine Pircher; Marije Bosch; Martine Dennekamp; Peter Ringleb
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 9.  Carotid Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Paola Moresoli; Bettina Habib; Pauline Reynier; Matthew H Secrest; Mark J Eisenberg; Kristian B Filion
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Results of the ROADSTER multicenter trial of transcarotid stenting with dynamic flow reversal.

Authors:  Christopher J Kwolek; Michael R Jaff; J Ignacio Leal; L Nelson Hopkins; Rasesh M Shah; Todd M Hanover; Sumaira Macdonald; Richard P Cambria
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.268

View more
  4 in total

1.  Association of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization vs Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting With Stroke or Death Among Patients With Carotid Artery Stenosis.

Authors:  Marc L Schermerhorn; Patric Liang; Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen; Jack L Cronenwett; Brian W Nolan; Vikram S Kashyap; Grace J Wang; Raghu L Motaganahalli; Mahmoud B Malas
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Effects of timing on in-hospital and one-year outcomes after transcarotid artery revascularization.

Authors:  Christina L Cui; Hanaa Dakour-Aridi; Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen; Marc L Schermerhorn; Jeffrey J Siracuse; Mahmoud B Malas
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Use of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization, Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting, and Carotid Endarterectomy in the US From 2015 to 2019.

Authors:  David P Stonko; Earl Goldsborough; Pavel Kibrik; George Zhang; Courtenay M Holscher; Caitlin W Hicks
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-09-01

4.  Hybrid Carotid Revascularization with Transient Flow Reversal.

Authors:  Boby Varkey Maramattom; Reji Paul; E Nidhin; T Jithendra; George Varghese Kurien
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 1.383

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.