Literature DB >> 30355202

Immediate and Delayed Procedural Stroke or Death in Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis.

Mandy D Müller1, Stefanie von Felten2, Ale Algra3, Jean-Pierre Becquemin4, Martin Brown5, Richard Bulbulia6, David Calvet7, Hans-Henning Eckstein8, Gustav Fraedrich9, Alison Halliday10, Jeroen Hendrikse11, John Gregson12, George Howard13, Olav Jansen14, Jean-Louis Mas7, Thomas G Brott15, Peter A Ringleb16, Leo H Bonati1,5.   

Abstract

Background and Purpose- Stenting for symptomatic carotid stenosis (carotid artery stenting [CAS]) carries a higher risk of procedural stroke or death than carotid endarterectomy (CEA). It is unclear whether this extra risk is present both on the day of procedure and within 1 to 30 days thereafter and whether clinical risk factors differ between these periods. Methods- We analyzed the risk of stroke or death occurring on the day of procedure (immediate procedural events) and within 1 to 30 days thereafter (delayed procedural events) in 4597 individual patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis who underwent CAS (n=2326) or CEA (n=2271) in 4 randomized trials. Results- Compared with CEA, patients treated with CAS were at greater risk for immediate procedural events (110 versus 42; 4.7% versus 1.9%; odds ratio, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.9-3.8) but not for delayed procedural events (59 versus 46; 2.5% versus 2.0%; odds ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9-1.9; interaction P=0.006). In patients treated with CAS, age increased the risk for both immediate and delayed events while qualifying event severity only increased the risk of delayed events. In patients treated with CEA, we found no risk factors for immediate events while a higher level of disability at baseline and known history of hypertension were associated with delayed procedural events. Conclusions- The increased procedural stroke or death risk associated with CAS compared with CEA was caused by an excess of events occurring on the day of procedure. This finding demonstrates the need to enhance the procedural safety of CAS by technical improvements of the procedure and increased operator skill. Higher age increased the risk for both immediate and delayed procedural events in CAS, mechanisms of which remain to be elucidated. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00190398. URL: http://www.isrctn.com . Unique identifier: ISRCTN57874028. URL: http://www.isrctn.com . Unique identifier: ISRCTN25337470. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00004732.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carotid stenosis; endarterectomy; risk; stents; stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30355202      PMCID: PMC6209445          DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  28 in total

1.  The PROFI study (Prevention of Cerebral Embolization by Proximal Balloon Occlusion Compared to Filter Protection During Carotid Artery Stenting): a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Klaudija Bijuklic; Andreas Wandler; Fadia Hazizi; Joachim Schofer
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Proximal versus distal protection during carotid artery stenting: analysis of the two treatment approaches and associated clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Maxim Mokin; Travis M Dumont; Joan Mihyun Chi; Connor J Mangan; Tareq Kass-Hout; Grant C Sorkin; Kenneth V Snyder; L Nelson Hopkins; Adnan H Siddiqui; Elad I Levy
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.104

3.  Design of the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs. Stenting Trial (CREST).

Authors:  A J Sheffet; G Roubin; G Howard; V Howard; W Moore; J F Meschia; R W Hobson; T G Brott
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.266

4.  Carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection: clinical alert from the Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients With Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) trial.

Authors:  J L Mas; G Chatellier; B Beyssen
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Cervical access for filter-protected carotid artery stenting: a useful tool to reduce cerebral embolisation.

Authors:  G Palombo; N Stella; V Faraglia; L Rizzo; C Fantozzi; A Bozzao; M Taurino
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 7.069

Review 6.  Carotid revascularization for prevention of stroke: carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Thomas G Brott; Robert D Brown; Fredric B Meyer; David A Miller; Harry J Cloft; Timothy M Sullivan
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Carotid artery stenting:the need for randomised trials.

Authors:  Martin M Brown; Werner Hacke
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 2.762

8.  Endarterectomy vs. Angioplasty in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) Trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.762

9.  Results of the ROADSTER multicenter trial of transcarotid stenting with dynamic flow reversal.

Authors:  Christopher J Kwolek; Michael R Jaff; J Ignacio Leal; L Nelson Hopkins; Rasesh M Shah; Todd M Hanover; Sumaira Macdonald; Richard P Cambria
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Predictors of Stroke, Myocardial Infarction or Death within 30 Days of Carotid Artery Stenting: Results from the International Carotid Stenting Study.

Authors:  D Doig; E L Turner; J Dobson; R L Featherstone; R T H Lo; P A Gaines; S Macdonald; L H Bonati; A Clifton; M M Brown
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 7.069

View more
  6 in total

1.  European Stroke Organisation guideline on endarterectomy and stenting for carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Leo H Bonati; Stavros Kakkos; Joachim Berkefeld; Gert J de Borst; Richard Bulbulia; Alison Halliday; Isabelle van Herzeele; Igor Koncar; Dominick Jh McCabe; Avtar Lal; Jean-Baptiste Ricco; Peter Ringleb; Martin Taylor-Rowan; Hans-Henning Eckstein
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2021-05-11

2.  Potential of machine learning to predict early ischemic events after carotid endarterectomy or stenting: a comparison with surgeon predictions.

Authors:  Kazuya Matsuo; Atsushi Fujita; Kohkichi Hosoda; Jun Tanaka; Taichiro Imahori; Taiji Ishii; Masaaki Kohta; Kazuhiro Tanaka; Yoichi Uozumi; Hidehito Kimura; Takashi Sasayama; Eiji Kohmura
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Purine nucleoside use as surrogate markers of cerebral ischaemia during local and general anaesthetic carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Owain Fisher; Ruth A Benson; Faming Tian; Nicholas E Dale; Christopher He Imray
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2019-07-18

Review 4.  Remote ischaemic conditioning for stroke: unanswered questions and future directions.

Authors:  Sheharyar Baig; Bethany Moyle; Krishnan Padmakumari Sivaraman Nair; Jessica Redgrave; Arshad Majid; Ali Ali
Journal:  Stroke Vasc Neurol       Date:  2021-04-26

Review 5.  The less invasive paradox, why carotid artery stenting is not suitable for the high-risk patient.

Authors:  Matthew Machin; Safa Salim; Sarah Onida; Alun Huw Davies
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-10

Review 6.  Immune Modulation as a Key Mechanism for the Protective Effects of Remote Ischemic Conditioning After Stroke.

Authors:  Sima Abbasi-Habashi; Glen C Jickling; Ian R Winship
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 4.003

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.