Literature DB >> 12822689

Preference reversals with food and water reinforcers in rats.

Leonard Green1, Sara J Estle.   

Abstract

Rats were given a choice between a smaller, immediately available reward and a larger reward available after a delay. In one phase, the reward was food and in another phase, the reward was water. Constant delays were added between the choice presentation and the delivery of the reward alternatives. As the time between choice and reward delivery increased from 0 to 25 s, all rats (except one in the water phase) reversed their preference from the smaller, sooner alternative to the larger, later alternative. These findings extend the generality of the preference-reversal animal model to qualitatively different reinforcers. Furthermore, the presence of both impulsive and self-control choices within the same animal is consistent with the view that self-control may be understood as choice behavior, and that species differences in self-control may be differences in degree, not kind.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12822689      PMCID: PMC1284932          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2003.79-233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  6 in total

1.  Choice as time allocation.

Authors:  W M Baum; H C Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Impulse control in pigeons.

Authors:  G W Ainslie
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Commitment, choice and self-control.

Authors:  H Rachlin; L Green
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Self-control in male and female rats.

Authors:  F Van Haaren; A Van Hest; N E Van De Poll
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Self-control in honeybees.

Authors:  Ken Cheng; Jennifer Peña; Melanie A Porter; Julia D Irwin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

6.  Self-control across species (Columba livia, Homo sapiens, and Rattus norvegicus).

Authors:  H Tobin; A W Logue
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.231

  6 in total
  28 in total

Review 1.  A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards.

Authors:  Leonard Green; Joel Myerson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Delay discounting of cocaine by rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  William L Woolverton; Joel Myerson; Leonard Green
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  Environmental rearing effects on impulsivity and reward sensitivity.

Authors:  Kimberly Kirkpatrick; Andrew T Marshall; Jacob Clarke; Mary E Cain
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Effects of morphine/CP55940 mixtures on an impulsive choice task in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Vanessa Minervini; Charles P France
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.293

Review 5.  Excessive discounting of delayed reinforcers as a trans-disease process contributing to addiction and other disease-related vulnerabilities: emerging evidence.

Authors:  Warren K Bickel; David P Jarmolowicz; E Terry Mueller; Mikhail N Koffarnus; Kirstin M Gatchalian
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 12.310

6.  Differential effects of social and novelty enrichment on individual differences in impulsivity and behavioral flexibility.

Authors:  Maya Zhe Wang; Andrew T Marshall; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Resurrecting the individual in behavioral analysis: Using mixed effects models to address nonsystematic discounting data.

Authors:  Kimberly Kirkpatrick; Andrew T Marshall; Catherine C Steele; Jennifer R Peterson
Journal:  Behav Anal (Wash D C)       Date:  2018-06-18

8.  Nucleus accumbens core lesions induce sub-optimal choice and reduce sensitivity to magnitude and delay in impulsive choice tasks.

Authors:  Catherine C Steele; Jennifer R Peterson; Andrew T Marshall; Sarah L Stuebing; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Measurement of impulsive choice in rats: same- and alternate-form test-retest reliability and temporal tracking.

Authors:  Jennifer R Peterson; Catherine C Hill; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Mechanisms of Individual Differences in Impulsive and Risky Choice in Rats.

Authors:  Kimberly Kirkpatrick; Andrew T Marshall; Aaron P Smith
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2015
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.