Literature DB >> 26501569

Characterization and validation of a Monte Carlo code for independent dose calculation in proton therapy treatments with pencil beam scanning.

F Fracchiolla1, S Lorentini, L Widesott, M Schwarz.   

Abstract

We propose a method of creating and validating a Monte Carlo (MC) model of a proton Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) machine using only commissioning measurements and avoiding the nozzle modeling. Measurements with a scintillating screen coupled with a CCD camera, ionization chamber and a Faraday Cup were used to model the beam in TOPAS without using any machine parameter information but the virtual source distance from the isocenter. Then the model was validated on simple Spread Out Bragg Peaks (SOBP) delivered in water phantom and with six realistic clinical plans (many involving 3 or more fields) on an anthropomorphic phantom. In particular the behavior of the moveable Range Shifter (RS) feature was investigated and its modeling has been proposed. The gamma analysis (3%,3 mm) was used to compare MC, TPS (XiO-ELEKTA) and measured 2D dose distributions (using radiochromic film). The MC modeling proposed here shows good results in the validation phase, both for simple irradiation geometry (SOBP in water) and for modulated treatment fields (on anthropomorphic phantoms). In particular head lesions were investigated and both MC and TPS data were compared with measurements. Treatment plans with no RS always showed a very good agreement with both of them (γ-Passing Rate (PR)  >  95%). Treatment plans in which the RS was needed were also tested and validated. For these treatment plans MC results showed better agreement with measurements (γ-PR  >  93%) than the one coming from TPS (γ-PR  <  88%). This work shows how to simplify the MC modeling of a PBS machine for proton therapy treatments without accounting for any hardware components and proposes a more reliable RS modeling than the one implemented in our TPS. The validation process has shown how this code is a valid candidate for a completely independent treatment plan dose calculation algorithm. This makes the code an important future tool for the patient specific QA verification process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26501569     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/21/8601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  12 in total

1.  DICOM-RT Ion interface to utilize MC simulations in routine clinical workflow for proton pencil beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jungwook Shin; Hanne M Kooy; Harald Paganetti; Benjamin Clasie
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 2.685

2.  The TOPAS tool for particle simulation, a Monte Carlo simulation tool for physics, biology and clinical research.

Authors:  Bruce Faddegon; José Ramos-Méndez; Jan Schuemann; Aimee McNamara; Jungwook Shin; Joseph Perl; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.685

3.  Clinical Commissioning of a Pencil Beam Scanning Treatment Planning System for Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Jatinder Saini; Ning Cao; Stephen R Bowen; Miguel Herrera; Daniel Nicewonger; Tony Wong; Charles D Bloch
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2016-08-29

4.  Pitfalls in the beam modelling process of Monte Carlo calculations for proton pencil beam scanning.

Authors:  Carla Winterhalter; Adam Aitkenhead; David Oxley; Jenny Richardson; Damien C Weber; Ranald I MacKay; Antony J Lomax; Sairos Safai
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Automated Monte-Carlo re-calculation of proton therapy plans using Geant4/Gate: implementation and comparison to plan-specific quality assurance measurements.

Authors:  Adam H Aitkenhead; Peter Sitch; Jenny C Richardson; Carla Winterhalter; Imran Patel; Ranald I Mackay
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  A benchmarking method to evaluate the accuracy of a commercial proton monte carlo pencil beam scanning treatment planning system.

Authors:  Liyong Lin; Sheng Huang; Minglei Kang; Petri Hiltunen; Reynald Vanderstraeten; Jari Lindberg; Sami Siljamaki; Todd Wareing; Ian Davis; Allen Barnett; John McGhee; Charles B Simone; Timothy D Solberg; James E McDonough; Christopher Ainsley
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Validation and clinical implementation of an accurate Monte Carlo code for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.

Authors:  Sheng Huang; Minglei Kang; Kevin Souris; Christopher Ainsley; Timothy D Solberg; James E McDonough; Charles B Simone; Liyong Lin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Methodology paper: a novel phantom setup for commissioning of scanned ion beam delivery and TPS.

Authors:  O Jäkel; B Ackermann; S Ecker; M Ellerbrock; P Heeg; K Henkner; M Winter
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Beam characteristics of the first clinical 360° rotational single gantry room scanning pencil beam proton treatment system and comparisons against a multi-room system.

Authors:  Charles Shang; Grant Evans; Mushfiqur Rahman; Liyong Lin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Benchmarking a GATE/Geant4 Monte Carlo model for proton beams in magnetic fields.

Authors:  Fatima Padilla-Cabal; Jose Alejandro Fragoso; Andreas Franz Resch; Dietmar Georg; Hermann Fuchs
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.