Literature DB >> 31772975

Clinical Commissioning of a Pencil Beam Scanning Treatment Planning System for Proton Therapy.

Jatinder Saini1, Ning Cao2, Stephen R Bowen2,3, Miguel Herrera1, Daniel Nicewonger4, Tony Wong1, Charles D Bloch2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In this report, we present the commissioning and validation results for a commercial proton pencil beam scanning RayStation treatment planning system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The commissioning data requirements are (1) integrated depth dose curves, (2) spot profiles, (3) absolute dose/monitor unit calibration, and (4) virtual source position. An 8-cm parallel plate chamber was used to measure the integrated depth dose curves by scanning a beam composed of a single spot in a water phantom. The spot profiles were measured at 5 different planes using a 2-dimensional scintillation detector. The absolute dose/monitor unit calibration was based on dose measurements in single-layer fields of size 10 × 10 cm2. The virtual-source position was calculated from the change in spot spacing with the distance from the isocenter. The beam model validation consisted of a comparison against commissioning data as well as a new set of verification measurements. For end-to-end testing, a series of phantom plans were created. These plans were measured at 1 to 3 depths using a 2-dimensional ion chamber array and evaluated for gamma index using the 3% and 3 mm criteria.
RESULTS: The maximum deviation for spot sigma measured versus calculated was -0.2 mm. The point-dose measurements for single-layer beams were within ± 3%, except for the largest field size (29 × 29 cm2) and the highest energy (226 MeV). The point doses in the spread-out Bragg peak plans showed a trend in which differences > 3% were seen for ranges > 30 cm, field sizes > 15 × 15 cm2, and depths > 25 cm. For end-to-end testing, 34 planes corresponding to 13 beams were analyzed for gamma index with a minimum pass rate of 92.8%.
CONCLUSION: The acceptable verification results and successful end-to-end testing ensured that all components of the treatment planning system were functional and the system was ready for clinical use. © Copyright 2016 International Journal of Particle Therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  commissioning; pencil beam scanning; protons; treatment planning system

Year:  2016        PMID: 31772975      PMCID: PMC6871575          DOI: 10.14338/IJPT-16-0000.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Part Ther        ISSN: 2331-5180


  12 in total

1.  Experimental characterization of lateral profiles of scanned proton and carbon ion pencil beams for improved beam models in ion therapy treatment planning.

Authors:  J Schwaab; S Brons; J Fieres; K Parodi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Characterization and validation of a Monte Carlo code for independent dose calculation in proton therapy treatments with pencil beam scanning.

Authors:  F Fracchiolla; S Lorentini; L Widesott; M Schwarz
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Experimental characterization and physical modelling of the dose distribution of scanned proton pencil beams.

Authors:  E Pedroni; S Scheib; T Böhringer; A Coray; M Grossmann; S Lin; A Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-02-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT.

Authors:  S Jan; G Santin; D Strul; S Staelens; K Assié; D Autret; S Avner; R Barbier; M Bardiès; P M Bloomfield; D Brasse; V Breton; P Bruyndonckx; I Buvat; A F Chatziioannou; Y Choi; Y H Chung; C Comtat; D Donnarieix; L Ferrer; S J Glick; C J Groiselle; D Guez; P F Honore; S Kerhoas-Cavata; A S Kirov; V Kohli; M Koole; M Krieguer; D J van der Laan; F Lamare; G Largeron; C Lartizien; D Lazaro; M C Maas; L Maigne; F Mayet; F Melot; C Merheb; E Pennacchio; J Perez; U Pietrzyk; F R Rannou; M Rey; D R Schaart; C R Schmidtlein; L Simon; T Y Song; J M Vieira; D Visvikis; R Van de Walle; E Wieërs; C Morel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: report of the IMRT Subcommittee of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee.

Authors:  Gary A Ezzell; James M Galvin; Daniel Low; Jatinder R Palta; Isaac Rosen; Michael B Sharpe; Ping Xia; Ying Xiao; Lei Xing; Cedric X Yu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Commissioning of the discrete spot scanning proton beam delivery system at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Proton Therapy Center, Houston.

Authors:  Michael T Gillin; Narayan Sahoo; Martin Bues; George Ciangaru; Gabriel Sawakuchi; Falk Poenisch; Bijan Arjomandy; Craig Martin; Uwe Titt; Kazumichi Suzuki; Alfred R Smith; X Ronald Zhu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  IMRT commissioning: multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119.

Authors:  Gary A Ezzell; Jay W Burmeister; Nesrin Dogan; Thomas J LoSasso; James G Mechalakos; Dimitris Mihailidis; Andrea Molineu; Jatinder R Palta; Chester R Ramsey; Bill J Salter; Jie Shi; Ping Xia; Ning J Yue; Ying Xiao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Experimentally validated pencil beam scanning source model in TOPAS.

Authors:  Liyong Lin; Minglei Kang; Timothy D Solberg; Christopher G Ainsley; James E McDonough
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Beyond Gaussians: a study of single-spot modeling for scanning proton dose calculation.

Authors:  Yupeng Li; Ronald X Zhu; Narayan Sahoo; Aman Anand; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Commissioning dose computation models for spot scanning proton beams in water for a commercially available treatment planning system.

Authors:  X R Zhu; F Poenisch; M Lii; G O Sawakuchi; U Titt; M Bues; X Song; X Zhang; Y Li; G Ciangaru; H Li; M B Taylor; K Suzuki; R Mohan; M T Gillin; N Sahoo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Treatment planning for proton therapy: what is needed in the next 10 years?

Authors:  Hakan Nystrom; Maria Fuglsang Jensen; Petra Witt Nystrom
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Dosimetric Comparison of Various Spot Placement Techniques in Proton Pencil Beam Scanning.

Authors:  Mahboob Ur Rehman; Omar A Zeidan; Twyla Willoughby; Sanford L Meeks; Patrick Kelly; Kevin Erhart
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2022-01-31

3.  The Advantage of Proton Therapy in Hypothalamic-Pituitary Axis and Hippocampus Avoidance for Children with Medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Saif Aljabab; Shushan Rana; Shadonna Maes; Avril O'Ryan-Blair; Jackie Castro; Jack Zheng; Lia M Halasz; Phillip J Taddei
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2021-08-02

4.  A systematic study of independently-tuned room-specific PBS beam model in a beam-matched multiroom proton therapy system.

Authors:  Yu-Hua Huang; Chunfeng Fang; Tao Yang; Lin Cao; Gaolong Zhang; Baolin Qu; Yihang Zhang; Zishen Wang; Shouping Xu
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Determination of Integral Depth Dose in Proton Pencil Beam Using Plane-parallel Ionization Chambers.

Authors:  Phatthraporn Thasasi; Sirinya Ruangchan; Puntiwa Oonsiri; Sornjarod Oonsiri
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2022-06-03

6.  Beam characteristics of the first clinical 360° rotational single gantry room scanning pencil beam proton treatment system and comparisons against a multi-room system.

Authors:  Charles Shang; Grant Evans; Mushfiqur Rahman; Liyong Lin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Comparative photon and proton dosimetry for patients with mediastinal lymphoma in the era of Monte Carlo treatment planning and variable relative biological effectiveness.

Authors:  Yolanda D Tseng; Shadonna M Maes; Gregory Kicska; Patricia Sponsellor; Erik Traneus; Tony Wong; Robert D Stewart; Jatinder Saini
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.481

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.