Regis P Kowalski1, Eric G Romanowski1, Kathleen A Yates1, Francis S Mah1. 1. The Charles T. Campbell Eye Microbiology Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Brilacidin (BRI), a novel defensin mimetic, was evaluated as an ocular anti-infective. METHODS: In vitro: Potency based on MIC90s was compared for 50 Staphylococcus aureus (SA), 50 Staphylococcus epidermidis (SE), and 25 each of Streptococcus pneumonia (SP), Streptococcus viridans (SV), Moraxella (MS), Haemophilus influenzae (HI), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA), and Serratia marcescens (SM). In vivo: Using established methods, ocular toxicity was graded with Draize testing. For efficacy testing, both corneas of 24 rabbits were infected with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), whereas the corneal epithelium was removed in the left eye. After 4 h, 21 topical drops over 5 h were administered to 4 groups: BRI 0.5%, vancomycin (VAN) 5%, saline, and no treatment. The eyes were clinically graded and the corneas were harvested for colony counts. RESULTS: In vitro: Both SA and SE had the lowest minimum inhibitory concentrations among the bacterial groups. The MIC90s to BRI for SP, SV, MS, HI, PA, and SM were 4, 32, 256, 32, 16, and 128-fold higher, respectively, than SA and SE. In vivo: Draize testing determined BRI 0.5% to be minimally irritating. For abraded corneas, BRI was not statistically different from VAN for reducing MRSA. BRI was bactericidal. For intact corneas, VAN reduced more CFU than BRI. BRI reduced CFU in abraded corneas more than intact corneas suggesting poor corneal penetration. CONCLUSIONS: BRI has Gram-positive in vitro activity; topical BRI 0.5% was minimally irritating; and BRI 0.5% was equally efficacious as VAN in a MRSA keratitis model when the corneal epithelium was removed.
OBJECTIVE:Species">pan class="Chemical">Brilacidin (BRI), a novel defensin mimetic, was evaluated as an ocular anti-infective. METHODS: In vitro: Potency based on MIC90s was compared for 50 Staphylococcus aureus (SA), 50 Staphylococcus epidermidis (SE), and 25 each of Streptococcus pneumonia (SP), Streptococcus viridans (SV), Moraxella (MS), Haemophilus influenzae (HI), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA), and Serratia marcescens (SM). In vivo: Using established methods, ocular toxicity was graded with Draize testing. For efficacy testing, both corneas of 24 rabbits were infected with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), whereas the corneal epithelium was removed in the left eye. After 4 h, 21 topical drops over 5 h were administered to 4 groups: BRI 0.5%, vancomycin (VAN) 5%, saline, and no treatment. The eyes were clinically graded and the corneas were harvested for colony counts. RESULTS: In vitro: Both SA and SE had the lowest minimum inhibitory concentrations among the bacterial groups. The MIC90s to BRI for SP, SV, MS, HI, PA, and SM were 4, 32, 256, 32, 16, and 128-fold higher, respectively, than SA and SE. In vivo: Draize testing determined BRI 0.5% to be minimally irritating. For abraded corneas, BRI was not statistically different from VAN for reducing MRSA. BRI was bactericidal. For intact corneas, VAN reduced more CFU than BRI. BRI reduced CFU in abraded corneas more than intact corneas suggesting poor corneal penetration. CONCLUSIONS: BRI has Gram-positive in vitro activity; topical BRI 0.5% was minimally irritating; and BRI 0.5% was equally efficacious as VAN in a MRSA keratitis model when the corneal epithelium was removed.
Authors: Eric G Romanowski; Francis S Mah; Kathleen A Yates; Regis P Kowalski; Y Jerold Gordon Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Chuan Xu; Annie Wang; William Honnen; Abraham Pinter; Warren K Weston; Jane A Harness; Aarthi Narayanan; Theresa L Chang Journal: EC Microbiol Date: 2022-03-08
Authors: Allison H Shannon; Sara A Adelman; Erin A Hisey; Sanskruti S Potnis; Vanessa Rozo; Madeline W Yung; Jennifer Y Li; Christopher J Murphy; Sara M Thomasy; Brian C Leonard Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2022-06-02 Impact factor: 6.064
Authors: Victor B Hsue; Kyohei Itamura; Arthur W Wu; Elisa A Illing; Kevin J Sokoloski; Bree A Weaver; Benjamin P Anthony; Nathan Hughes; Jonathan Y Ting; Thomas S Higgins Journal: Adv Exp Med Biol Date: 2021 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Ibrahim Alkanfari; Katie B Freeman; Saptarshi Roy; Tahsin Jahan; Richard W Scott; Hydar Ali Journal: Cells Date: 2019-04-03 Impact factor: 6.600
Authors: Despoina Koulenti; Elena Xu; Andrew Song; Isaac Yin Sum Mok; Drosos E Karageorgopoulos; Apostolos Armaganidis; Sotirios Tsiodras; Jeffrey Lipman Journal: Microorganisms Date: 2020-01-30