Literature DB >> 26501236

Outcome Preferences in Patients With Noninfectious Uveitis: Results of a Best-Worst Scaling Study.

Tsung Yu1, Janet T Holbrook2, Jennifer E Thorne3, Terry N Flynn4, Mark L Van Natta2, Milo A Puhan5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To estimate patient preferences regarding potential adverse outcomes of local versus systemic corticosteroid therapies for noninfectious uveitis by using a best-worst scaling (BWS) approach.
METHODS: Local and systemic therapies are alternatives for noninfectious uveitis that have different potential adverse outcomes. Patients participating in the Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment Trial Follow-up Study (MUST FS) and additional patients with a history of noninfectious uveitis treated at two academic medical centers (Johns Hopkins University and University of Pennsylvania) were surveyed about their preferences regarding six adverse outcomes deemed important to patients. Using "case 1" BWS, patients were asked to repeatedly select the most and least worrying from a list of outcomes (in the survey three outcomes per task).
RESULTS: Eighty-two patients in the MUST FS and 100 patients treated at the academic medical centers completed the survey. According to BWS, patients were more likely to select vision not meeting the requirement for driving (individual BWS score: median = 3, interquartile range, 0-5), development of glaucoma (2, 1-4), and needing eye surgery (1, 0-3) as the most worrying outcomes as compared to needing medicine for high blood pressure/cholesterol (-2, -4 to 0), development of cataracts (-2, -3 to -1), or infection (sinusitis) (-3, -5 to 0). Larger BWS scores indicated the outcomes were more worrying to patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with noninfectious uveitis considered impaired vision, development of glaucoma, and need for eye surgery worrying adverse outcomes, which suggests that it is especially desirable to avoid these outcomes if possible. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00132691.)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26501236      PMCID: PMC4627251          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.15-16705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  22 in total

Review 1.  Preference-based measures in economic evaluation in health care.

Authors:  P J Neumann; S J Goldie; M C Weinstein
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 21.981

Review 2.  Valuing citizen and patient preferences in health: recent developments in three types of best-worst scaling.

Authors:  Terry N Flynn
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.217

3.  Sensitivity and perspective in the valuation of health status: whose values count?

Authors:  G A De Wit; J J Busschbach; F T De Charro
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Randomized comparison of systemic anti-inflammatory therapy versus fluocinolone acetonide implant for intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis: the multicenter uveitis steroid treatment trial.

Authors:  John H Kempen; Michael M Altaweel; Janet T Holbrook; Douglas A Jabs; Thomas A Louis; Elizabeth A Sugar; Jennifer E Thorne
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 5.  Incidence and US costs of corticosteroid-associated adverse events: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Evelyn Sarnes; Leslie Crofford; Maria Watson; Greg Dennis; Hong Kan; Damon Bass
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 3.393

6.  Whose quality of life? A commentary exploring discrepancies between health state evaluations of patients and the general public.

Authors:  Peter A Ubel; George Loewenstein; Christopher Jepson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  Safety of low dose glucocorticoid treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: published evidence and prospective trial data.

Authors:  J A P Da Silva; J W G Jacobs; J R Kirwan; M Boers; K G Saag; L B S Inês; E J P de Koning; F Buttgereit; M Cutolo; H Capell; R Rau; J W J Bijlsma
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Decision analysis using individual patient preferences to determine optimal treatment for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin D Sommers; Clair J Beard; Anthony V D'Amico; Douglas Dahl; Irving Kaplan; Jerome P Richie; Richard J Zeckhauser
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Risk of elevated intraocular pressure and glaucoma in patients with uveitis: results of the multicenter uveitis steroid treatment trial.

Authors:  David S Friedman; Janet T Holbrook; Husam Ansari; Judith Alexander; Alyce Burke; Susan B Reed; Joanne Katz; Jennifer E Thorne; Susan L Lightman; John H Kempen
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Benefits and harms of roflumilast in moderate to severe COPD.

Authors:  Tsung Yu; Kevin Fain; Cynthia M Boyd; Sonal Singh; Carlos O Weiss; Tianjing Li; Ravi Varadhan; Milo A Puhan
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 9.139

View more
  3 in total

1.  Using a patient-centered approach to benefit-harm assessment in treatment decision-making: a case study in uveitis.

Authors:  Tsung Yu; Janet T Holbrook; Jennifer E Thorne; Milo A Puhan
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 2.890

Review 2.  Using Best-Worst Scaling to Investigate Preferences in Health Care.

Authors:  Kei Long Cheung; Ben F M Wijnen; Ilene L Hollin; Ellen M Janssen; John F Bridges; Silvia M A A Evers; Mickael Hiligsmann
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Fingolimod versus interferon beta 1-a: Benefit-harm assessment approach based on TRANSFORMS individual patient data.

Authors:  Alessandra Spanu; Hélène E Aschmann; Jürg Kesselring; Milo A Puhan
Journal:  Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin       Date:  2022-09-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.