Literature DB >> 10884966

Preference-based measures in economic evaluation in health care.

P J Neumann1, S J Goldie, M C Weinstein.   

Abstract

Estimating preferences for states of health has been an active area of research in recent years. Unlike psychophysical approaches, which discriminate levels of health status, preference-based approaches incorporate values or utilities for health outcomes and can be used in cost-effectiveness analyses to aid resource allocation decisions. This chapter considers issues and controversies involved in using preference-based measures in economic evaluation in health care, with a particular emphasis on cost-utility analysis and the estimation of quality-adjusted life years. Topics considered include techniques for measuring preferences, the use of preference-based classification systems, the relationship between patient and community preferences, methods for obtaining utilities from clinical trials, mapping health status from health utilities, the development of "off-the-shelf" preference weights, and proposed alternatives to quality-adjusted life years. We also consider applications of cost-utility analyses to public health interventions. Although cost-utility analyses have become more popular recently, many challenges remain for the field. Widespread acceptance of the methodology likely awaits more consensus on measurement techniques, as well as educational efforts in the public health and medical communities on the usefulness of the approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10884966     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health        ISSN: 0163-7525            Impact factor:   21.981


  110 in total

Review 1.  The role of marketing in pharmaceutical research and development.

Authors:  John E Calfee
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Measuring what people value: a comparison of "attitude" and "preference" surveys.

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips; F Reed Johnson; Tara Maddala
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Using the effect size to model change in preference values from descriptive health status.

Authors:  Kristy Sanderson; Gavin Andrews; Justine Corry; Helen Lapsley
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Evidence from cost-effectiveness research.

Authors:  Katia Noyes; Robert G Holloway
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2004-07

5.  Health related quality of life in genital herpes: a pilot comparison of measures.

Authors:  D N Fisman
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.519

6.  Mapping the EQ-5D index from the SF-12: US general population preferences in a nationally representative sample.

Authors:  Patrick W Sullivan; Vahram Ghushchyan
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Measuring preferences for cost-utility analysis: how choice of method may influence decision-making.

Authors:  Christine M McDonough; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Marker states and a health state prompt provide modest improvements in the reliability and validity of the standard gamble and rating scale in prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Karen E Bremner; George Tomlinson; Murray D Krahn
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  A design process for using normative models in shared decision making: a case study in the context of prenatal testing.

Authors:  Sivan Rapaport; Moshe Leshno; Lior Fink
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Effects of treatment, choice, and preference on health-related quality-of-life outcomes in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Authors:  Quang A Le; Jason N Doctor; Lori A Zoellner; Norah C Feeny
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.