Literature DB >> 26501214

Optimizing Vowel Formant Measurements in Four Acoustic Analysis Systems for Diverse Speaker Groups.

Ekaterini Derdemezis, Houri K Vorperian, Ray D Kent, Marios Fourakis, Emily L Reinicke, Daniel M Bolt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study systematically assessed the effects of select linear predictive coding (LPC) analysis parameter manipulations on vowel formant measurements for diverse speaker groups using 4 trademarked Speech Acoustic Analysis Software Packages (SAASPs): CSL, Praat, TF32, and WaveSurfer.
METHOD: Productions of 4 words containing the corner vowels were recorded from 4 speaker groups with typical development (male and female adults and male and female children) and 4 speaker groups with Down syndrome (male and female adults and male and female children). Formant frequencies were determined from manual measurements using a consensus analysis procedure to establish formant reference values, and from the 4 SAASPs (using both the default analysis parameters and with adjustments or manipulations to select parameters). Smaller differences between values obtained from the SAASPs and the consensus analysis implied more optimal analysis parameter settings.
RESULTS: Manipulations of default analysis parameters in CSL, Praat, and TF32 yielded more accurate formant measurements, though the benefit was not uniform across speaker groups and formants. In WaveSurfer, manipulations did not improve formant measurements.
CONCLUSIONS: The effects of analysis parameter manipulations on accuracy of formant-frequency measurements varied by SAASP, speaker group, and formant. The information from this study helps to guide clinical and research applications of SAASPs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26501214      PMCID: PMC5270637          DOI: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-15-0020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol        ISSN: 1058-0360            Impact factor:   2.408


  17 in total

1.  Changes to articulation following LSVT(R) and traditional dysarthria therapy in non-progressive dysarthria.

Authors:  Rachel J Wenke; Petrea Cornwell; Deborah G Theodoros
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.484

2.  Classification of speech and language profiles in 4-year-old children with cerebral palsy: a prospective preliminary study.

Authors:  Katherine C Hustad; Kristin Gorton; Jimin Lee
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Vowel acoustics in dysarthria: speech disorder diagnosis and classification.

Authors:  Kaitlin L Lansford; Julie M Liss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  An evaluation of articulatory working space area in vowel production of adults with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Kate Bunton; Mark Leddy
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 1.346

5.  Articulatory changes in muscle tension dysphonia: evidence of vowel space expansion following manual circumlaryngeal therapy.

Authors:  Nelson Roy; Shawn L Nissen; Christopher Dromey; Shimon Sapir
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 2.288

6.  Cross-dialectal variation in formant dynamics of American English vowels.

Authors:  Robert Allen Fox; Ewa Jacewicz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Statistical properties of linear prediction analysis underlying the challenge of formant bandwidth estimation.

Authors:  Daryush D Mehta; Patrick J Wolfe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Automatic formant tracking by a Newton-Raphson technique.

Authors:  J P Olive
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Imprecise vowel articulation as a potential early marker of Parkinson's disease: effect of speaking task.

Authors:  Jan Rusz; Roman Cmejla; Tereza Tykalova; Hana Ruzickova; Jiri Klempir; Veronika Majerova; Jana Picmausova; Jan Roth; Evzen Ruzicka
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Impairment of vowel articulation as a possible marker of disease progression in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Sabine Skodda; Wenke Grönheit; Uwe Schlegel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Native non-prototypicality in vowel perception induces prominent neuromagnetic mismatch intensities in non-native speakers: a pilot study.

Authors:  Mikio Kubota; Junko Matsuzaki; Ippeita Dan; Haruka Dan; George Zouridakis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Corner vowels in males and females ages 4 to 20 years: Fundamental and F1-F4 formant frequencies.

Authors:  Houri K Vorperian; Raymond D Kent; Yen Lee; Daniel M Bolt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of Aging on Vocal Fundamental Frequency and Vowel Formants in Men and Women.

Authors:  Julie Traub Eichhorn; Raymond D Kent; Diane Austin; Houri K Vorperian
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 4.  Static measurements of vowel formant frequencies and bandwidths: A review.

Authors:  Raymond D Kent; Houri K Vorperian
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.288

5.  Effects of sampling rate and type of anti-aliasing filter on linear-predictive estimates of formant frequencies in men, women, and children.

Authors:  Paul H Milenkovic; Madison Wagner; Raymond D Kent; Brad H Story; Houri K Vorperian
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A Modeling-Guided Case Study of Disordered Speech in Minimally Verbal Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Karen V Chenausky; Amanda Brignell; Angela T Morgan; Andrea C Norton; Helen B Tager-Flusberg; Gottfried Schlaug; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 2.408

7.  Auditory-perceptual acuity in rhotic misarticulation: baseline characteristics and treatment response.

Authors:  Laine Cialdella; Heather Kabakoff; Jonathan Preston; Sarah Dugan; Caroline Spencer; Suzanne Boyce; Mark Tiede; D Whalen; Tara McAllister
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 1.346

8.  Comparing Biofeedback Types for Children With Residual /ɹ/ Errors in American English: A Single-Case Randomization Design.

Authors:  Nina R Benway; Elaine R Hitchcock; Tara McAllister; Graham Tomkins Feeny; Jennifer Hill; Jonathan L Preston
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.408

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.