Literature DB >> 19894839

Cross-dialectal variation in formant dynamics of American English vowels.

Robert Allen Fox1, Ewa Jacewicz.   

Abstract

This study aims to characterize the nature of the dynamic spectral change in vowels in three distinct regional varieties of American English spoken in the Western North Carolina, in Central Ohio, and in Southern Wisconsin. The vowels /I, epsilon, e, ae, aI/ were produced by 48 women for a total of 1920 utterances and were contained in words of the structure /bVts/ and /bVdz/ in sentences which elicited nonemphatic and emphatic vowels. Measurements made at the vowel target (i.e., the central 60% of the vowel) produced a set of acoustic parameters which included position and movement in the F1 by F2 space, vowel duration, amount of spectral change [measured as vector length (VL) and trajectory length (TL)], and spectral rate of change. Results revealed expected variation in formant dynamics as a function of phonetic factors (vowel emphasis and consonantal context). However, for each vowel and for each measure employed, dialect was a strong source of variation in vowel-inherent spectral change. In general, the dialect-specific nature and amount of spectral change can be characterized quite effectively by position and movement in the F1 by F2 space, vowel duration, TL (but not VL which underestimates formant movement), and spectral rate of change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19894839      PMCID: PMC2787076          DOI: 10.1121/1.3212921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  25 in total

1.  Effects of prosodic factors on spectral dynamics. I. Analysis.

Authors:  Johan Wouters; Michael W Macon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  On the sufficiency of compound target specification of isolated vowels and vowels in /bVb/ syllables.

Authors:  J E Andruski; T M Nearey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Compensation for coarticulation, /u/-fronting, and sound change in standard southern British: an acoustic and perceptual study.

Authors:  Jonathan Harrington; Felicitas Kleber; Ulrich Reubold
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Consonant environment specifies vowel identity.

Authors:  W Strange; R R Verbrugge; D P Shankweiler; T R Edman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels spoken in sentence context.

Authors:  W Strange
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effect of speaking rate on diphthong formant movements.

Authors:  T Gay
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Spectral-shape features versus formants as acoustic correlates for vowels.

Authors:  S A Zahorian; A J Jagharghi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels.

Authors:  W Strange; J J Jenkins; T L Johnson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Sarah Hargus Ferguson; Diane Kewley-Port
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Vowel classification based on fundamental frequency and formant frequencies.

Authors:  J Hillenbrand; R T Gayvert
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1993-08
View more
  17 in total

1.  Optimizing Vowel Formant Measurements in Four Acoustic Analysis Systems for Diverse Speaker Groups.

Authors:  Ekaterini Derdemezis; Houri K Vorperian; Ray D Kent; Marios Fourakis; Emily L Reinicke; Daniel M Bolt
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  Intrinsic fundamental frequency of vowels is moderated by regional dialect.

Authors:  Ewa Jacewicz; Robert Allen Fox
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Acoustic properties of vowel production in prelingually deafened Mandarin-speaking children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jing Yang; Emily Brown; Robert A Fox; Li Xu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The effects of indexical and phonetic variation on vowel perception in typically developing 9- to 12-year-old children.

Authors:  Ewa Jacewicz; Robert Allen Fox
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Vowel acoustics in Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis: comparison of clear, loud, and slow speaking conditions.

Authors:  Kris Tjaden; Jennifer Lam; Greg Wilding
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 6.  What Acoustic Studies Tell Us About Vowels in Developing and Disordered Speech.

Authors:  Ray D Kent; Carrie Rountrey
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.408

7.  Perception of local and non-local vowels by adults and children in the South.

Authors:  Ewa Jacewicz; Robert Allen Fox
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Cross-generational vowel change in American English.

Authors:  Ewa Jacewicz; Robert Allen Fox; Joseph Salmons
Journal:  Lang Var Change       Date:  2011-03-01

9.  Reconceptualizing the vowel space in analyzing regional dialect variation and sound change in American English.

Authors:  Robert Allen Fox; Ewa Jacewicz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Vowel change across three age groups of speakers in three regional varieties of American English.

Authors:  Ewa Jacewicz; Robert A Fox; Joseph Salmons
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2011-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.