Literature DB >> 26498988

Activity of fosfomycin and comparison of several susceptibility testing methods against contemporary urine isolates.

Elizabeth B Hirsch1, Brian R Raux2, Paola C Zucchi2, Yisu Kim2, Christopher McCoy3, James E Kirby4, Sharon B Wright4, George M Eliopoulos4.   

Abstract

Fosfomycin is recommended as first-line treatment for acute uncomplicated cystitis in women. It has demonstrated in vitro activity against a variety of pathogens; however, a paucity of data are available from the USA. We determined the susceptibility of a collection of urine isolates to fosfomycin and compared multiple methods of susceptibility testing. Consecutive non-duplicate Enterobacteriaceae, enterococci and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were collected from the clinical microbiology laboratory between August 2013 and January 2014. Isolates represented hospitalised or emergency department patients with monomicrobial bacteriuria. Fosfomycin MICs were determined in duplicate, on separate days, by Etest and disk diffusion and results were compared with agar dilution. Nitrofurantoin and ciprofloxacin were used as comparators. MIC results were categorised using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute interpretive criteria for Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis. Correlation between the three testing methods was evaluated. Overall susceptibility to fosfomycin was 94.4%, 93.5% and 87.9% by agar dilution, disk diffusion and Etest, respectively. Five fosfomycin-resistant isolates were identified, including two Morganella morganii, one P. aeruginosa, one Proteus mirabilis and one Enterobacter aerogenes. Across all organisms, rates of essential agreement, categorical agreement, minor errors, major errors and very major errors for Etest/disk diffusion compared with agar dilution were 77.3%/NA, 89.5/93.8%, 7.1/5.0%, 3.6/1.3% and 0/0%, respectively. Fosfomycin displayed fairly consistent activity against a majority of isolates collected when using the susceptibility breakpoint of 64 μg/mL. MICs for E. coli were particularly low (≤2 μg/mL). These data lend support to current guidelines that recommend fosfomycin as empirical first-line therapy for uncomplicated UTI.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae; Multidrug-resistant; UTI; Uropathogens

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26498988     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents        ISSN: 0924-8579            Impact factor:   5.283


  17 in total

1.  Susceptibility of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Urine Isolates to Oral Antibiotics.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Hirsch; Paola C Zucchi; Alice Chen; Brian R Raux; James E Kirby; Christopher McCoy; George M Eliopoulos
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Fosfomycin: Resurgence of an old companion.

Authors:  Sangeeta Sastry; Yohei Doi
Journal:  J Infect Chemother       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 2.211

3.  Performance of Four Fosfomycin Susceptibility Testing Methods against an International Collection of Clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Smith; Hunter V Brigman; Jadyn C Anderson; Christopher L Emery; Tiffany E Bias; Phillip J Bergen; Cornelia B Landersdorfer; Elizabeth B Hirsch
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Use of Fosfomycin Etest To Determine In Vitro Susceptibility of Clinical Isolates of Enterobacterales Other than Escherichia coli, Nonfermenting Gram-Negative Bacilli, and Gram-Positive Cocci.

Authors:  James A Karlowsky; Melanie R Baxter; Alyssa R Golden; Heather J Adam; Andrew Walkty; Philippe R S Lagacé-Wiens; George G Zhanel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Susceptibility to first choice antimicrobial treatment for urinary tract infections to Escherichia coli isolates from women urine samples in community South Brazil.

Authors:  Zuleica Naomi Tano; Renata K Kobayashi; Evelyn Poliana Candido; Juliana Buck Dias; Luis Felipe Perugini; Eliana Carolina Vespero; Wander Rogerio Pavanelli
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.257

Review 6.  Differences in Fosfomycin Resistance Mechanisms between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales.

Authors:  Dina Zheng; Phillip J Bergen; Cornelia B Landersdorfer; Elizabeth B Hirsch
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 5.938

7.  Susceptibility of Clinical Isolates of Escherichia coli to Fosfomycin as Measured by Four In Vitro Testing Methods.

Authors:  James A Karlowsky; Philippe R S Lagacé-Wiens; Nancy M Laing; Melanie R Baxter; Heather J Adam; George G Zhanel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Rapid Detection of Fosfomycin Resistance in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Patrice Nordmann; Laurent Poirel; Linda Mueller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Widespread Fosfomycin Resistance in Gram-Negative Bacteria Attributable to the Chromosomal fosA Gene.

Authors:  Ryota Ito; Mustapha M Mustapha; Adam D Tomich; Jake D Callaghan; Christi L McElheny; Roberta T Mettus; Robert M Q Shanks; Nicolas Sluis-Cremer; Yohei Doi
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 7.867

10.  Fosfomycin Susceptibility in Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Species and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci Urinary Isolates.

Authors:  Linda B Ou; Lynn Nadeau
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2017-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.