Literature DB >> 32817224

Susceptibility of Clinical Isolates of Escherichia coli to Fosfomycin as Measured by Four In Vitro Testing Methods.

James A Karlowsky1,2, Philippe R S Lagacé-Wiens1,2, Nancy M Laing1, Melanie R Baxter1, Heather J Adam1,2, George G Zhanel3.   

Abstract

Clinical isolates of Escherichia coli (n = 554) were tested against fosfomycin using agar dilution, disk diffusion, and Etest. Agar dilution (reference method) identified few isolates with fosfomycin MICs of 64 (n = 3), 128 (n = 4), and ≥256 μg/ml (n = 2). Applying CLSI (M100, 2020) and EUCAST (v. 10.0, 2020) breakpoints, 98.9% and 98.4% (agar dilution), 99.3% and 99.1% (disk diffusion), and 99.1% and 98.9% (Etest) of isolates were fosfomycin susceptible, respectively. Essential agreement (agar dilution versus Etest) was low (40.8%); 59.3% (131/221) of isolates with agar dilution MICs of 2 to 128 μg/ml tested 2 to 4 doubling dilutions lower by Etest. Applying CLSI breakpoints, categorical agreement was >99% for both disk diffusion and Etest; no major errors (MEs) or very major errors (VMEs) were identified, and rates of minor errors (mEs) were <1%. EUCAST breakpoints yielded categorical agreements of >99% and no MEs for both disk diffusion and Etest; however, VMEs occurred at unacceptable rates of 44.4% (disk diffusion) and 33.3% (Etest). All isolates with agar dilution MICs of ≥32 μg/ml (n = 12) and a subset of isolates with MICs of ≤16 μg/ml (n = 49) were also tested using the Vitek 2 AST-N391 card and generated fosfomycin MICs 1 to ≥3 doubling dilutions lower than agar dilution for 11/12 isolates with agar dilution MICs of ≥32 μg/ml. We conclude that performing fosfomycin disk diffusion or Etest on urinary isolates of E. coli and interpreting results using CLSI breakpoints reliably identified fosfomycin-susceptible isolates regardless of differences in endpoint reading criteria. EUCAST breakpoints generated excessive rates of VMEs for our isolate collection of high fosfomycin susceptibility.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  E. colizzm321990; agar dilution; fosfomycin; testing methods

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32817224      PMCID: PMC7512169          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01306-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  16 in total

1.  Small-Molecule Inhibitor of FosA Expands Fosfomycin Activity to Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens.

Authors:  Adam D Tomich; Erik H Klontz; Daniel Deredge; John P Barnard; Christi L McElheny; Megan L Eshbach; Ora A Weisz; Patrick Wintrode; Yohei Doi; Eric J Sundberg; Nicolas Sluis-Cremer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Fosfomycin tromethamine susceptibility of outpatient urine isolates of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis from ten North American medical centres by three methods.

Authors:  P C Fuchs; A L Barry; S D Brown
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Susceptibility of ESBL Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae to fosfomycin in the Netherlands and comparison of several testing methods including Etest, MIC test strip, Vitek2, Phoenix and disc diffusion.

Authors:  Wouter van den Bijllaardt; Maarten J Schijffelen; Ron W Bosboom; James Cohen Stuart; Bram Diederen; Greetje Kampinga; Thuy-Nga Le; Ilse Overdevest; Frans Stals; Paul Voorn; Karola Waar; Johan W Mouton; Anouk E Muller
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Frequency and Mechanisms of Spontaneous Fosfomycin Nonsusceptibility Observed upon Disk Diffusion Testing of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Aaron E Lucas; Ryota Ito; Mustapha M Mustapha; Christi L McElheny; Roberta T Mettus; Sarah L Bowler; Serena F Kantz; Marissa P Pacey; A William Pasculle; Vaughn S Cooper; Yohei Doi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Discrepancies in fosfomycin susceptibility testing of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae with various commercial methods.

Authors:  Giulio Camarlinghi; Eva Maria Parisio; Alberto Antonelli; Maria Nardone; Marco Coppi; Tommaso Giani; Romano Mattei; Gian Maria Rossolini
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 2.803

6.  Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Combination With Fosfomycin: A Novel Therapeutic Strategy Against Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Krisztina M Papp-Wallace; Elise T Zeiser; Scott A Becka; Steven Park; Brigid M Wilson; Marisa L Winkler; Roshan D'Souza; Indresh Singh; Granger Sutton; Derrick E Fouts; Liang Chen; Barry N Kreiswirth; Evelyn J Ellis-Grosse; George L Drusano; David S Perlin; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Activity of fosfomycin and comparison of several susceptibility testing methods against contemporary urine isolates.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Hirsch; Brian R Raux; Paola C Zucchi; Yisu Kim; Christopher McCoy; James E Kirby; Sharon B Wright; George M Eliopoulos
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 5.283

8.  In vitro susceptibility testing procedures for fosfomycin tromethamine.

Authors:  A L Barry; P C Fuchs
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  42936 pathogens from Canadian hospitals: 10 years of results (2007-16) from the CANWARD surveillance study.

Authors:  George G Zhanel; Heather J Adam; Melanie R Baxter; Jeff Fuller; Kimberly A Nichol; Andrew J Denisuik; Alyssa R Golden; Rachel Hink; Philippe R S Lagacé-Wiens; Andrew Walkty; Michael R Mulvey; Frank Schweizer; Denice Bay; Daryl J Hoban; James A Karlowsky
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 10.  Fosfomycin: A First-Line Oral Therapy for Acute Uncomplicated Cystitis.

Authors:  George G Zhanel; Andrew J Walkty; James A Karlowsky
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.471

View more
  1 in total

1.  Use of Fosfomycin Etest To Determine In Vitro Susceptibility of Clinical Isolates of Enterobacterales Other than Escherichia coli, Nonfermenting Gram-Negative Bacilli, and Gram-Positive Cocci.

Authors:  James A Karlowsky; Melanie R Baxter; Alyssa R Golden; Heather J Adam; Andrew Walkty; Philippe R S Lagacé-Wiens; George G Zhanel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 5.948

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.