Literature DB >> 26498751

Longitudinal predictors of informal and formal caregiving time in community-dwelling dementia patients.

André Hajek1, Christian Brettschneider2, Annette Ernst3, Tina Posselt3, Birgitt Wiese4, Jana Prokein4, Siegfried Weyerer5, Jochen Werle5, Angela Fuchs6, Michael Pentzek6, Janine Stein7, Steffi G Riedel-Heller7, Horst Bickel8, Edelgard Mösch8, Kathrin Heser9, Frank Jessen10,11, Wolfgang Maier9,11, Martin Scherer3, Hans-Helmut König2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Care provided in the community for dementia patients on an individual basis may be very time consuming. Yet, little is known about the factors affecting caregiving time for community-dwelling dementia patients. Thus, we aimed to investigate the predictors of informal and formal caregiving time for these patients in a longitudinal approach.
METHOD: Caregiving time for n = 126 community-dwelling dementia patients was assessed by proxy interviews in four assessments at 6-month intervals (1.5 years of longitudinal follow-up; AgeCoDe study). Measurement of informal caregiving time was based on a German adaptation of the Resource Utilization in Dementia questionnaire. Dementia severity was measured by the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). We used random effects models to estimate the effects of sociodemographic variables (age, gender, marital status and education), comorbidity and dementia severity on informal and formal caregiving time.
RESULTS: At the first assessment, mean age was 85.0 years (±3.2 years). The majority of patients was female (65.9 %), not married (divorced, single, widowed: 55.6 %) and had primary education (63.5 %). Furthermore, mean GDS was 4.4 (±0.8) and mean MMSE was 20.1 (±5.1). According to CDR, 43 individuals had very mild dementia, 55 individuals had mild dementia and 28 individuals had moderate/severe dementia. Moreover, mean total caregiving time was 3.4 h per day (±4.0). Thereof the main part represents informal caregiving time (2.3 h ± 3.4), whereas formal caregiving time was 1.2 h (±2.4). Dementia severity was associated with total caregiving time, mainly influenced by informal caregiving time. Age was positively associated with total caregiving time, driven by formal caregiving time, while being married was positively associated with total caregiving time, mainly affected by informal caregiving time. All need categories of informal caregiving time were strongly related to dementia severity, whereas none of the categories of formal caregiving time were related to dementia severity.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings extend previous studies that found an association between informal caregiving time and dementia severity. Moreover, our findings highlight the role of informal care for community-dwelling dementia patients in Germany. Informal caregiving time strongly increases with dementia severity. Consequently, as the number of patients suffering from dementia is expected to increase considerably in the next decades, there is a paramount need to strengthen the informal care system to meet patients' needs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dementia; Formal caregiving time; Informal caregiving time; Longitudinal study

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26498751     DOI: 10.1007/s00127-015-1138-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol        ISSN: 0933-7954            Impact factor:   4.328


  20 in total

1.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX.

Authors:  F I MAHONEY; D W BARTHEL
Journal:  Md State Med J       Date:  1965-02

3.  Validity and reliability of assessments of time. Comparisons of direct observations and estimates of time by the use of the resource utilization in dementia (RUD)-instrument.

Authors:  Anders Wimo; Gunilla Nordberg
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 3.250

Review 4.  Validity, reliability, and feasibility of clinical staging scales in dementia: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marcel G M Olde Rikkert; Klodiana Daphne Tona; Lieneke Janssen; Alistair Burns; Anatonio Lobo; Philippe Robert; Norman Sartorius; Gabriela Stoppe; Gunhild Waldemar
Journal:  Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 2.035

5.  The association between quantitative measures of dementia and of senile change in the cerebral grey matter of elderly subjects.

Authors:  G Blessed; B E Tomlinson; M Roth
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 9.319

6.  The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules.

Authors:  J C Morris
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Clinical dementia rating: a reliable and valid diagnostic and staging measure for dementia of the Alzheimer type.

Authors:  J C Morris
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.878

8.  The Global Deterioration Scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia.

Authors:  B Reisberg; S H Ferris; M J de Leon; T Crook
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  Patient dependence and longitudinal changes in costs of care in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Carolyn W Zhu; Christopher Leibman; Trent McLaughlin; Arthur S Zbrozek; Nikolaos Scarmeas; Marilyn Albert; Jason Brandt; Deborah Blacker; Mary Sano; Yaakov Stern
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 2.959

10.  Predictors of costs in dementia in a longitudinal perspective.

Authors:  Hanna Leicht; Hans-Helmut König; Nina Stuhldreher; Cadja Bachmann; Horst Bickel; Angela Fuchs; Kathrin Heser; Frank Jessen; Mirjam Köhler; Melanie Luppa; Edelgard Mösch; Michael Pentzek; Steffi Riedel-Heller; Martin Scherer; Jochen Werle; Siegfried Weyerer; Birgitt Wiese; Wolfgang Maier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  18 in total

1.  [Potential for informal care of the elderly in Germany : Results of a representative population-based survey].

Authors:  André Hajek; Thomas Lehnert; Annemarie Wegener; Steffi G Riedel-Heller; Hans-Helmut König
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 1.281

2.  [Informal care for dementia according to type of service].

Authors:  C Brettschneider; A Hajek; J Stein; T Luck; S Mamone; B Wiese; E Mösch; D Weeg; A Fuchs; M Pentzek; J Werle; S Weyerer; T Mallon; H van den Bussche; K Heser; M Wagner; M Scherer; W Maier; S G Riedel-Heller; H-H König
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  Classification tree model of the personal economic burden of dementia care by related factors of both people with dementia and caregivers in Japan: a cross-sectional online survey.

Authors:  Takayo Nakabe; Noriko Sasaki; Hironori Uematsu; Susumu Kunisawa; Anders Wimo; Yuichi Imanaka
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Impact of coronary heart disease on cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease: a prospective longitudinal cohort study in primary care.

Authors:  Markus Bleckwenn; Luca Kleineidam; Michael Wagner; Frank Jessen; Siegfried Weyerer; Jochen Werle; Birgitt Wiese; Dagmar Lühmann; Tina Posselt; Hans-Helmut König; Christian Brettschneider; Edelgard Mösch; Dagmar Weeg; Angela Fuchs; Michael Pentzek; Tobias Luck; Steffi G Riedel-Heller; Wolfgang Maier; Martin Scherer
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Caring Together: Trajectories of Paid and Family Caregiving Support to Those Living in the Community With Dementia.

Authors:  Jennifer M Reckrey; Lihua Li; Serena Zhan; Jennifer Wolff; Cynthia Yee; Katherine A Ornstein
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.942

6.  Differences in quality of life in home-dwelling persons and nursing home residents with dementia - a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Christine Olsen; Ingeborg Pedersen; Astrid Bergland; Marie-José Enders-Slegers; Nina Jøranson; Giovanna Calogiuri; Camilla Ihlebæk
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.921

7.  Who should take care of me? Preferences of old age individuals for characteristics of professional long-term caregivers: an observational cross-sectional study.

Authors:  André Hajek; Thomas Lehnert; Annemarie Wegener; Steffi G Riedel-Heller; Hans-Helmut König
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-08-10

8.  Factors associated with preferences for long-term care settings in old age: evidence from a population-based survey in Germany.

Authors:  André Hajek; Thomas Lehnert; Annemarie Wegener; Steffi G Riedel-Heller; Hans-Helmut König
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Association of informal caregiving with body mass index and frequency of sporting activities: evidence of a population-based study in Germany.

Authors:  André Hajek; Jens-Oliver Bock; Hans-Helmut König
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Family caregiving in the community up to 8-years after onset of dementia.

Authors:  Eric Jutkowitz; Joseph E Gaugler; Amal N Trivedi; Lauren L Mitchell; Pedro Gozalo
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 4.070

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.