Literature DB >> 26498455

The effect of primary midwife-led care on women's experience of childbirth: results from the COSMOS randomised controlled trial.

H L McLachlan1, D A Forster1,2, M-A Davey1,3, T Farrell2, M Flood1, T Shafiei1, U Waldenström4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of primary midwife-led care ('caseload midwifery') on women's experiences of childbirth.
DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial.
SETTING: Tertiary care women's hospital in Melbourne, Australia. POPULATION: A total of 2314 low-risk pregnant women.
METHODS: Women randomised to caseload care received antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care from a primary midwife, with some care provided by a 'back-up' midwife. Women in standard care received midwifery-led care with varying levels of continuity, junior obstetric care or community-based medical care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome of the study was caesarean section. This paper presents a secondary outcome, women's experience of childbirth. Women's views and experiences were sought using seven-point rating scales via postal questionnaires 2 months after the birth.
RESULTS: A total of 2314 women were randomised between September 2007 and June 2010; 1156 to caseload and 1158 to standard care. Response rates to the follow-up questionnaire were 88 and 74%, respectively. Women in the caseload group were more positive about their overall birth experience than women in the standard care group (adjusted odds ratio 1.50, 95% CI 1.22-1.84). They also felt more in control during labour, were more proud of themselves, less anxious, and more likely to have a positive experience of pain.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with standard maternity care, caseload midwifery may improve women's experiences of childbirth. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Primary midwife-led care ('caseload midwifery') improves women's experiences of childbirth.
© 2015 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Birth experience; caseload midwifery; continuity of care; midwife-led care; primary midwife care; randomised controlled trial

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26498455     DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  12 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding.

Authors:  Olukunmi O Balogun; Elizabeth J O'Sullivan; Alison McFadden; Erika Ota; Anna Gavine; Christine D Garner; Mary J Renfrew; Stephen MacGillivray
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-09

2.  The effect of backup midwife on maternal experience after vaginal childbirth - a qualitative study.

Authors:  Shiva Khodarahmi; Sepideh Hajian; Elham Zare; Malihe Nasiri
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2022-04

3.  Childbearing women's experiences of the maternity care system in Australia during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Linda Sweet; Alyce N Wilson; Zoe Bradfield; Yvonne Hauck; Lesley Kuliukas; Caroline S E Homer; Rebecca A Szabo; Karen Wynter; Vidanka Vasilevski
Journal:  Women Birth       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 3.349

4.  Women's descriptions of childbirth trauma relating to care provider actions and interactions.

Authors:  Rachel Reed; Rachael Sharman; Christian Inglis
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Adaptation of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) in China: A multisite cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Xiu Zhu; Yan Wang; Hong Zhou; Liqian Qiu; Ruyan Pang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The midwifery-led care model: a continuity of care model in the birth path.

Authors:  Alba Ricchi; Franco Rossi; Patrizia Borgognoni; Maria Chiara Bassi; Giovanna Artioli; Chiara Foa; Isabella Neri
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2019-07-08

7.  Measuring organizational readiness for implementing change (ORIC) in a new midwifery model of care in rural South Australia.

Authors:  Pamela Adelson; Rachael Yates; Julie-Anne Fleet; Lois McKellar
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 8.  Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women.

Authors:  Jane Sandall; Hora Soltani; Simon Gates; Andrew Shennan; Declan Devane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-28

Review 9.  Creating a positive perception of childbirth experience: systematic review and meta-analysis of prenatal and intrapartum interventions.

Authors:  Mahshid Taheri; Amirhossien Takian; Ziba Taghizadeh; Nahid Jafari; Nasrin Sarafraz
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.223

10.  Caesarean section trends in Catalonia between 2013 and 2017 based on the Robson classification system: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Garazi Carrillo-Aguirre; Albert Dalmau-Bueno; Carlos Campillo-Artero; Anna García-Altés
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.