Pamela Adelson1, Rachael Yates2, Julie-Anne Fleet3, Lois McKellar4. 1. Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, City East Campus, Playford Building P4-27, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia. pam.adelson@unisa.edu.au. 2. Rural Support Service, South Australia Health, Government of South Australia, Mount Gambier Health Service, Mount Gambier, SA, 5290, Australia. 3. Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, City East Campus, Playford Building P4-27, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia. 4. UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, City East Campus, Playford Building P4-27, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The sustainability of Australian rural maternity services is under threat due to current workforce shortages. In July 2019, a new midwifery caseload model of care was implemented in rural South Australia to provide midwifery continuity of care and promote a sustainable workforce in the area. The model is unique as it brings together five birthing sites connecting midwives, doctors, nurses and community teams. A critical precursor to successful implementation requires those working in the model be ready to adopt to the change. We surveyed clinicians at the five sites transitioning to the new model of care in order to assess their organizational readiness to implement change. METHODS: A descriptive study assessing readiness for change was measured using the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change scale (ORIC). The 12 item Likert scale measures a participant's commitment to change and change efficacy. All clinicians working within the model of care (midwives, nurses and doctors) were invited to complete an e-survey. RESULTS: Overall, 55% (56/102) of clinicians participating in the model responded. The mean ORIC score was 41.5 (range 12-60) suggesting collectively, midwives, nurses and doctors began the new model of care with a sense of readiness for change. Participants were most likely to agree on the change efficacy statements, "People who work here feel confident that the organization can get people invested in implementing this change and the change commitment statements "People who work here are determined to implement this change", "People who work here want to implement this change", and "People who work here are committed to implementing this change. CONCLUSION: Results of the ORIC survey indicate that clinicians transitioning to the new model of care were willing to embrace change and commit to the new model. The process of organizational change in health care settings is challenging and a continuous process. If readiness for change is high, organizational members invest more in the change effort and exhibit greater persistence to overcome barriers and setbacks. This is the first reported use of the instrument amongst midwives and nurses in Australia and should be considered for use in other national and international clinical implementation studies.
BACKGROUND: The sustainability of Australian rural maternity services is under threat due to current workforce shortages. In July 2019, a new midwifery caseload model of care was implemented in rural South Australia to provide midwifery continuity of care and promote a sustainable workforce in the area. The model is unique as it brings together five birthing sites connecting midwives, doctors, nurses and community teams. A critical precursor to successful implementation requires those working in the model be ready to adopt to the change. We surveyed clinicians at the five sites transitioning to the new model of care in order to assess their organizational readiness to implement change. METHODS: A descriptive study assessing readiness for change was measured using the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change scale (ORIC). The 12 item Likert scale measures a participant's commitment to change and change efficacy. All clinicians working within the model of care (midwives, nurses and doctors) were invited to complete an e-survey. RESULTS: Overall, 55% (56/102) of clinicians participating in the model responded. The mean ORIC score was 41.5 (range 12-60) suggesting collectively, midwives, nurses and doctors began the new model of care with a sense of readiness for change. Participants were most likely to agree on the change efficacy statements, "People who work here feel confident that the organization can get people invested in implementing this change and the change commitment statements "People who work here are determined to implement this change", "People who work here want to implement this change", and "People who work here are committed to implementing this change. CONCLUSION: Results of the ORIC survey indicate that clinicians transitioning to the new model of care were willing to embrace change and commit to the new model. The process of organizational change in health care settings is challenging and a continuous process. If readiness for change is high, organizational members invest more in the change effort and exhibit greater persistence to overcome barriers and setbacks. This is the first reported use of the instrument amongst midwives and nurses in Australia and should be considered for use in other national and international clinical implementation studies.
Entities:
Keywords:
Australia; Continuity of care; Midwifery; ORIC; Organizational readiness; Rural and remote; Workforce
Authors: Linda P Sweet; Virginia A Boon; Vanessa Brinkworth; Sarah Sutton; Allison F Werner Journal: Aust J Rural Health Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 1.662
Authors: D Turnbull; A Holmes; N Shields; H Cheyne; S Twaddle; W H Gilmour; M McGinley; M Reid; I Johnstone; I Geer; G McIlwaine; C B Lunan Journal: Lancet Date: 1996-07-27 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Sue Kruske; Sue Kildea; Bec Jenkinson; Jennifer Pilcher; Sarah Robin; Margaret Rolfe; Jude Kornelsen; Lesley Barclay Journal: Midwifery Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 2.372
Authors: Michelle Durst; Margaret Rolfe; Jo Longman; Sarah Robin; Beverley Dhnaram; Kathryn Mullany; Ian Wright; Lesley Barclay Journal: Aust J Rural Health Date: 2016-07-06 Impact factor: 1.662