| Literature DB >> 26498332 |
Guiyuan Ji1, Yuqi Wang2,3, Yingxun Deng4, Xin Li5, Zhuoqin Jiang6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is one of the leading causes of chronic liver disease that can progress to liver fibrosis, cirrhosis and eventually hepatocellular carcinoma. Resveratrol, a naturally occurring phytoalexin, is believed to have therapeutic effects on hepatic steatosis. However, the effect of resveratrol on NASH and the underlying mechanism is not fully illustrated. In the present study, we aimed to exam the effect of resveratrol on methionine/choline-deficient (MCD) diet or medium-induced hepatic steatosis, oxidation and inflammation, and to explore the possible mechanism.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26498332 PMCID: PMC4619480 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-015-0139-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Resveratrol reduces the severity of NASH induced by MCD
| Control | MCD | MCD + R-L | MCD + R-M | MCD + R-H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mice (In vivo) | |||||
| Final body weight (g) | 26.5 ± 1.6 | 13.7 ± 0.8** | 14.2 ± 0.8 | 15.2 ± 0.8 | |
| Liver weight (g) | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1* | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | |
| Liver/body (%) | 2.5 ± 0.3 | 9.5 ± 1.3** | 6.1 ± 0.4 | 5.3 ± 0.7*** | |
| Liver TG (μg/mg Pro) | 2.1 ± 0.3 | 10.3 ± 1.6** | 7.2 ± 0.8*** | 3.6 ± 0.6**** | |
| Serum ALT (U/L) | 57.2 ± 8.3 | 174.1 ± 32.8** | 125.0 ± 21.7*** | 96.4 ± 18.1**** | |
| Liver TBARs (μmol/g Pro) | 2.1 ± 0.3 | 10.3 ± 1.5* | 7.6 ± 0.9*** | 5.21 ± 0.6**** | |
| NAS score | 2.0 ± 0.3 | 8.7 ± 1.2* | 7.0 ± 0.5*** | 5.9 ± 0.4**** | |
| Cell (In vitro) | |||||
| ALT (U/L) | 27.8 ± 3.8 | 78.9 ± 10.2* | 66.2 ± 8.7 | 49.1 ± 6.4*** | 40.3 ± 6.5**** |
| AST (U/L) | 34.6 ± 3.0 | 95.8 ± 11.3* | 83.7 ± 9.8 | 67.0 ± 7.3*** | 52.9 ± 7.0**** |
| TBARs (μmol/g Pro) | 13.1 ± 1.2 | 41.7 ± 5.8** | 37.4 ± 3.8 | 29.8 ± 2.8*** | 20.5 ± 2.3**** |
| ROS | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 5.6 ± 0.9** | 3.9 ± 0.57*** | 2.7 ± 0.4**** | 2.1 ± 0.4**** |
| TG (μg/mg Pro) | 89.2 ± 8.5 | 276.3 ± 30.2** | 190.5 ± 21.0*** | 143.1 ± 15.8**** | 95.4 ± 9.7**** |
Values are means ± SD, n = 10 (Serum and Liver) or n = 3 (Cell, three triplicate experiments)
R resveratrol, MCD methionine/choline-deficient diet or methionine/choline-deficient medium
In vivo, MCD + R-L (100 mg/kg), MCD + R-H (250 mg/kg)
In vitro, MCD + R-L (25 μmol/L), MCD + R-M (50 μmol/L), MCD + R-H (100 μmol/L)
* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 compared to Control
*** P < 0.05, **** P < 0.01 compared to MCD
Fig. 1Histological analysis of mice livers. Mice were fed with normal chow diet (Control), with MCD diet (MCD), with MCD diet and treated P.O with 100 mg/kg resveratrol (MCD + Res 100), with MCD diet and treated P.O with 250 mg/kg resveratrol (MCD + Res 250) for 4 weeks. Their liver tissue sections were stained with H&E and examined under a light microscope. Data shown are representative images (magnification 20x) of each group (n = 10 per group) and all mice were analyzed simultaneously
Effects of resveratrol on inflammatory cytokine levels in MCD-induced NASH
| IL-1β | IL-6 | TNF-α | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | mRNA | Protein | mRNA | Protein | mRNA | |
| Serum or liver ( | ||||||
| Control | 24.7 ± 4.1 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 19.2 ± 3.0 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 31.8 ± 3.7 | 1.0 ± 0.3 |
| MCD | 216.9 ± 35.8* | 5.9 ± 1.7* | 124.7 ± 18.3* | 11.7 ± 2.8* | 198.4 ± 27.9* | 7.8 ± 1.9* |
| MCD + R100 | 127.4 ± 15.4** | 3.2 ± 0.8** | 76.2 ± 7.7** | 4.8 ± 1.2** | 77.2 ± 8.15** | 2.7 ± 0.7*** |
| MCD + R250 | 69.1 ± 9.3*** | 1.0 ± 0.3*** | 43.1 ± 3.6*** | 2.2 ± 0.5*** | 54.8 ± 5.14*** | 1.4 ± 0.4*** |
| Cell ( | ||||||
| Control | 28.4 ± 3.07 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 86.2 ± 6.4 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 117.4 ± 11.6 | 1.0 ± 0.1 |
| MCD | 86.9 ± 11.7* | 2.8 ± 0.5* | 278.5 ± 35.6* | 5.4 ± 0.7* | 786.5 ± 82.5* | 9.1 ± 1.0* |
| MCD + R25 | 60.5 ± 8.6** | 2.2 ± 0.4 | 149.2 ± 17.3*** | 4.6 ± 0.4 | 445.7 ± 40.3** | 5.8 ± 0.5** |
| MCD + R50 | 47.2 ± 4.1*** | 1.7 ± 0.3** | 124.7 ± 12.6*** | 3.3 ± 0.3** | 360.1 ± 25.7*** | 3.6 ± 0.3*** |
| MCD + R100 | 41.9 ± 3.9*** | 1.3 ± 0.1*** | 117.4 ± 10.2*** | 1.7 ± 0.3*** | 279.6 ± 16.3*** | 1.4 ± 0.2*** |
Values are means ± SD, n = 10 (serum) or n = 3 (medium, three triplicate experiments)
MCD methionine/choline-deficient, R resveratrol
* P < 0.01 compared to Control. ** P < 0.05, *** P < 0.01 compared to MCD
Fig. 2Effects of resveratrol on autophagy-related protein expressions in mice livers and AML12 cells. Mice were fed a normal diet (Control) or the MCD diet (MCD) with or without 100 mg/kg resveratrol (MCD + Res 100), 250 mg/kg resveratrol (MCD + Res 250) for 4 weeks. AML12 cells were incubated with resveratrol (25 μmol/L, 50 μmol/L, or 100 μmol/L) in the presence or absence of MCD medium for 24 h. LC3 and P62 levels were evaluated by immunoblotting both in mice livers (a,b) and in AML12 cells (c,d). Levels of LC3 and P62 were determined and the protein bands were quantified by densitometry and normalized to the amount of GAPDH in hepatic tissue and AML12 cells. The data were represented as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 v.s. Control; # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01 v.s. MCD
Effects of chloroquine(CQ) intervention on resveratrol treatment in MCD medium induced-NASH
| Control | MCD | MCD + R | MCD + R + CQ | MCD + CQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALT(U/L) | 29.5 ± 4.6 | 83.6 ± 6.4* | 38.5 ± 5.9 | 57.6 ± 7.3△△ | 94.7 ± 11.8▲▲ |
| AST(U/L) | 32.9 ± 3.1 | 100.2 ± 10.5* | 51.0 ± 6.4 | 73.0 ± 8.1△△ | 112.5 ± 12.4▲ |
| TG (μg/mg Pro) | 86.7 ± 9.2 | 294.5 ± 28.9** | 139.8 ± 16.2 | 229.6 ± 21.5△△ | 381.0 ± 36.1▲▲ |
| TBARs (μmol/g Pro) | 12.1 ± 1.2 | 43.5 ± 4.7** | 23.9 ± 2.4 | 27.1 ± 2.6△ | 53.6 ± 5.5▲▲ |
| ROS | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 6.6 ± 1.3** | 2.4 ± 0.3 | 3.6 ± 0.7△△ | 9.8 ± 1.14▲▲ |
| IL-1β (pg/ml) | 25.1 ± 3.3 | 89.7 ± 12.3** | 40.3 ± 4.3 | 68.3 ± 8.1△△ | 147.3 ± 13.3▲▲ |
| IL-6 (pg/ml) | 78.6 ± 5.8 | 285.5 ± 32.3** | 185.1 ± 16.4 | 207.8 ± 21.6△△ | 358.6 ± 33.1▲▲ |
| TNF-α (pg/ml) | 121.3 ± 12.9 | 792.4 ± 82.7** | 285.9 ± 25.7 | 541.3 ± 58.4△△ | 1043.9 ± 112.7▲▲ |
| IL-1β mRNA | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 3.2 ± 0.4** | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 7.4 ± 0.9▲▲ |
| IL-6 mRNA | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 5.7 ± 0.6** | 2.2 ± 0.4 | 3.5 ± 0.4△ | 8.9 ± 1.1▲▲ |
| TNF-α mRNA | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 8.7 ± 0.9** | 1.7 ± 0.3 | 3.6 ± 0.5△ | 14.3 ± 1.8▲▲ |
Values are means ± SD, n = 3; MCD: methionine/choline-deficient medium
R resveratrol (100 μmol/L), CQ chloroquine
* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 compared to Control
△ P < 0.05, △△ P < 0.01 compared to MCD + R
▲ P < 0.05, ▲▲ P < 0.01 compared to MCD + R + CQ
Primer sequences used for amplification of cDNA by RT-PCR
| Primer | Forward primer (5′-3′) | Reverse primer (5′-3′) | Accession No. |
|---|---|---|---|
| IL-1β | GAAATGCCACCTTTTGACAGTG | TGGATGCTCTCATCAGGACAG | NM_008361 |
| IL-6 | CTGCAAGAGACTTCCATCCAG | AGTGGTATAGACAGGTCTGTTGG | NM_031168 |
| TNF-α | CAGGCGGTGCCTATGTCTC | CGATCACCCCGAAGTTCAGTAG | NM_013693 |
| GAPDH | TGATGACATCAAGAAGGTGGTGAAG | TCCTTGGAGGCCATGTAGGCCAT | NM_008084 |