MX belongs to a family of type I interferon (IFN)-stimulated genes, and the MX protein has antiviral activity. MX has at least two isoforms, known as MX1 and MX2, in mammals. Moreover, bovine MX1 has been found to have alternative splice variants-namely, MX1-a and MX1B. In ruminants, IFN-τ-a type I IFN-is temporarily produced from the conceptus before implantation and induces MX expression in the endometrium. However, the expression dynamics of MX after implantation are not clear. In the present study, we investigated the expression of MX1-a, MX1B and MX2 in the endometrium and placenta before and after implantation along with the expression of IFN-α, type I receptors (IFNAR1 and IFNAR2) and interferon regulatory factors (IRF3 and IRF9). Pregnant uterine samples were divided into five groups according to pregnancy days 14-18, 25-40, 50-70, 80-100, and 130-150. Tissue samples were collected from the intercaruncular endometrium (IC), caruncular endometrium (C) and fetal placenta (P). Although all the MX expressions were significantly higher in the IC and C at days 14-18, presumably caused by embryo-secreted IFN-τ stimulation, their expressions were also detectable in the IC, C and P after implantation. Furthermore, IFN-α expression was significantly higher in the IC. RT-PCR indicated IFNAR1, IFNAR2, IRF3 and IRF9 mRNA in all the tissues during pregnancy. These results suggest that all the MX genes are affected by the type I IFN pathway during pregnancy and are involved in an immune response to protect the mother and fetus.
MX belongs to a family of type I interferon (IFN)-stimulated genes, and the MX protein has antiviral activity. MX has at least two isoforms, known as MX1 and MX2, in mammals. Moreover, bovineMX1 has been found to have alternative splice variants-namely, MX1-a and MX1B. In ruminants, IFN-τ-a type I IFN-is temporarily produced from the conceptus before implantation and induces MX expression in the endometrium. However, the expression dynamics of MX after implantation are not clear. In the present study, we investigated the expression of MX1-a, MX1B and MX2 in the endometrium and placenta before and after implantation along with the expression of IFN-α, type I receptors (IFNAR1 and IFNAR2) and interferon regulatory factors (IRF3 and IRF9). Pregnant uterine samples were divided into five groups according to pregnancy days 14-18, 25-40, 50-70, 80-100, and 130-150. Tissue samples were collected from the intercaruncular endometrium (IC), caruncular endometrium (C) and fetal placenta (P). Although all the MX expressions were significantly higher in the IC and C at days 14-18, presumably caused by embryo-secreted IFN-τ stimulation, their expressions were also detectable in the IC, C and P after implantation. Furthermore, IFN-α expression was significantly higher in the IC. RT-PCR indicated IFNAR1, IFNAR2, IRF3 and IRF9 mRNA in all the tissues during pregnancy. These results suggest that all the MX genes are affected by the type I IFN pathway during pregnancy and are involved in an immune response to protect the mother and fetus.
In ruminants such as cows and sheep, a type I interferon (IFN)—IFN-τ—is secreted from the trophoblast before
implantation [1]. IFN-τ is known as a pregnancy recognition signal that
inhibits oxytocin receptor expression and the production of PGF2α and maintains the corpus luteum and pregnancy
[2]. Several IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) are expressed in uterine tissue
via IFN-τ stimulation [3,4,5]. The Myxovirus resistance (MX) genes are
ISGs, and their levels of mRNA and protein increase in the endometrium at the time of implantation [6,7,8,9,10,11]. The in vitro expression of MX1 and MX2
mRNA in bovine epithelial cells is stimulated by IFN-τ [10, 12]. This IFN-τ signaling pathway is called the janus kinase (JAK)-signal
transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling pathway, and it is activated via a transmembrane
receptor composed of the IFNAR1 and IFNAR2 subunits [2,3,4, 13]. IFN-τ
production occurs only at preimplantation, and it is not clear whether MX mRNA is induced by the
IFN signaling pathway during pregnancy.On the other hand, IFN is typically produced in innate immune responses in mammals. When bacteria and viruses
infect animals, pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and RIG-I-like receptors,
recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns and trigger the type I IFN signaling pathway [14]. IFN-α/β, a type I IFN, is induced by interferon regulatory factors (IRFs)
3 and 7 and stimulates the JAK-STAT signal pathway via type I IFN-α/β receptors composed of the IFNAR1 and IFNAR2
subunits [15, 16]. At that time,
activated JAK1 and tyrosine kinase 2 bind to the intracellular domain of IFNAR1/2 and are responsible for
phosphorylating and dimerizing STAT1/2, which serves as a transcription factor [15, 16]. Phosphorylated and dimerized STAT1/2 combines with IRF9
to form the ISGF3 complex, which activates the transcription of ISGs by binding to the IFN-stimulated responsive
element after nuclear translocation [15, 16].MX is known to suppress several viruses including the influenza virus and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) [17,18,19,20]. In cows, two isoforms of MX are
present—MX1 and MX2; additionally, bovineMX1 has alternative
splice variants, MX1-a and MX1B [9, 21]. Interestingly, MX1-a has antiviral activity against VSV,
whereas MX1B does not inhibit VSV proliferation in the cytoplasm, and its own function is unknown [22, 23]. In fact, MX1-a localizes in the
cytoplasm, but almost all of MX1B localizes in the nucleus. MX2 also has antiviral activity against VSV [24], and its intracellular localization is unknown [25]. As mentioned above, cows have three MX gene isoforms; however, the
distribution of MX1-a and MX1B expression have not been analyzed. In addition,
very little is known about MX expression in uterine and placental tissue after implantation.In this study, to elucidate whether these MX genes are expressed after implantation in cows, we
investigated to detect the expression dynamics of MX1-a, MX1B and
MX2 mRNA in uterine and placental tissues from early to mid pregnancy. Furthermore, we examined
relative expressions of IFN-α mRNA and the expression of type I IFN receptor subunits
(IFNAR1 and IFNAR2) and interferon regulatory factors (IRF3
and IRF9) in relation to the type I IFN signaling pathway.
Materials and Methods
Sample collection from pregnant uterine and fetal tissues
This study was conducted in accordance with the Hokkaido University guidelines for the care and use of
animals. Pregnant uteri were collected from cows slaughtered between days 14 and 18 of pregnancy after embryo
transfer on day 7 of the estrus cycle. Uteri at mid-pregnancy stages were collected from abattoirs. The
collected pregnant uteri were divided into five groups: days 14–18 (n = 3), 25–40 (n = 3), 50–70 (n = 3),
80–100 (n = 4) and 130–150 (n = 4), confirming the existence of a conceptus on days 14–18 and assessing day of
pregnancy in the other groups according to crown-rump length of fetuses from the top of the head to the bottom
of the buttocks. The intercaruncular endometrium (IC) and caruncular endometrium (C) tissues from pregnant
uterine horns, and fetal placenta (P) tissues were collected for RNA extraction.
RNA extraction and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
Total RNA was extracted from the 3 tissue groups (IC, C and P) using ISOGEN II (Nippon Gene, Toyama, Japan),
and cDNA was synthesized from total RNA by reverse transcription using the ReverTra Ace® qPCR RT
Master Mix with gDNA Remover (Toyobo Life Science, Osaka, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. PCR
was performed with an Astec Program Temp Control System (PC-815 or 816, Astec, Fukuoka, Japan). Each cDNA
sample concentration was measured by spectrophotometry (NanoDrop ND-2000, Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE,
USA) and was adjusted to 100 ng/μl. All cDNA samples were stored in a freezer at –30 C.
RT-PCR and quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)
Specific primers for MX1-a, MX1B, MX2,
IFN-α, IFNAR1, IFNAR2, IRF3,
IRF9 and H2AFZ mRNA expression were designed using Primer-BLAST. The
primer details are shown in Table 1. Expression of IFNAR1, IFNAR2, IRF3,
IRF9 and H2AFZ was detected by RT-PCR analysis using an Astec Program Temp
Control System (PC-815 or 816, Astec) and GoTaq® Hot Start Green Master Mix (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The
thermal cycling conditions were 1 cycle at 95 C for 5 min (initial denaturation); 35 cycles at 95 C for 30 sec
(denaturation), 55 C for 1 min (primer annealing) and 72 C for 1 min (extension); and then 1 cycle at 72 C for
5 min (final extension). The PCR products were detected by electrophoresis using a 2.0% agarose gel with
Midori Green (Nippon Genetics, Tokyo, Japan).
Table 1.
Information about the primer sequences used for RT-PCR or qRT-PCR
Gene
Sequence (5’–3’)
Accession No.
Product length (bp)
MX1-a
GCCAACTAGTCAGCACTACATTGTC
NM_173940.2
139
GCTCTTGGACTCCATATCTTCAC
MX1B
GTGATATCTCCAACAGTGAAGC
AB_060169.1
94
AACTGATTCGAGAAGCCAAG
MX2
CAGAGACGCCTCAGTCGAAG
NM_173941.2
113
GAGACGTTTGCTGGTTTCCATG
IFN-α
CTAGAGAGCAGGTTCACAGAGTC
NM_001017411.1
106
GCTGAGCAGCAACAGGGATAG
IFNAR1
GCGAAGAGTTTCCGCAACAG
NM_174552.2
275
TCCAAGGCAGGTCCAATGAC
IFNAR2
TCGTATGTTGCGCCTGTTCT
NM_174553.2
231
GTCCGTCGTGTTTACCCACA
IRF3
GCTCAACTGACGGGAAGTGG
NM_001029845.3
116
TGGTCTGGCCTAAGTGTTGG
IRF9
CAGTTCCCAGGAGTGTGCTG
NM_001024506.1
125
TATATCGCCCAGGCCTTGAA
H2AFZ
AGAGCCGGTTTGCAGTTCCCG
NM_174809.2
116
TACTCCAGGATGGCTGCGCTGT
The expression levels of MX1-a, MX1B, MX2 and
IFN-α were invesitigated by qRT-PCR using a LightCycler® 480 System II (Roche
Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) and THUNDERBIRDTM SYBR® qPCR Mix (Toyobo Life Science).
The thermal cycling conditions were 1 cycle at 95 C for 30 sec (denaturation), followed by 50 cycles at 95 C
for 10 sec (denaturation), 55 C for 15 sec (primer annealing) and 72 C for 30 sec (extension). The relative
expression levels of MX1-a, MX1B, MX2 and
IFN-α were calculated by the ΔΔCt method using the expression of H2AFZ as
the reference gene.
Statistical analysis
All data are shown as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The statistical significance of
differences was assessed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Fisher’s protected
least-significant difference (PLSD) procedure as the multiple comparison test. P values of < 0.01 or <
0.05 were considered statistically significant. P values of < 0.1 was regarded as indicating a
tendency.
Results
Expression of MX1-a, MX1B and MX2 mRNA in uterine tissues in the pre- and postimplantation stages
The relative expressions of MX1-a, MX1B and MX2 mRNA in
pregnant uterine tissues (IC and C) were higher at days 14–18 than days 25–40 (Fig. 1A, C and E; P < 0.01) and the highest on days 14–18 compared with the mid-pregnancy stages, including days
50–70, 80–100 and 130–150 (Fig. 1 A–F; P < 0.01). Although the
expression levels of all the MX mRNAs markedly decreased immediately after the pregnancy
stage of days 25–40 in the time of implantation, these MX genes were also expressed in the
endometrium after implantation.
Fig. 1.
Expression of MX1-a, MX1B, and MX2 mRNA in the
endometrium and fetal placenta in the pre- and postimplantation stages. The vertical line shows the
relative expression levels of mRNA using qRT-PCR, standardized with the reference gene
H2AFZ, whereas the horizontal axis indicates the stages of pregnancy and types of
tissue samples for the genes (A and B) MX1-a, (C and D) MX1B, and (E
and F) MX2. IC, intercaruncular endometrium; C, caruncular endometrium; P, fetal
placenta. The numbers 14–18, 25–40, 50–70, 80–100, and 130–150 indicate the number of pregnancy days for
each subgroup. All data are shown as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Asterisks indicate
significant differences (** P < 0.01; * P < 0.05) among pregnancy stages, and letters indicate
significant differences (P < 0.05) among three tissues as determined by ANOVA, followed by the
Fisher’s PLSD procedure as the multiple comparison test. Additionally, a number sign
(#) indicates a tendency for significant differences (P < 0.1).
Expression of MX1-a, MX1B, and MX2 mRNA in the
endometrium and fetal placenta in the pre- and postimplantation stages. The vertical line shows the
relative expression levels of mRNA using qRT-PCR, standardized with the reference gene
H2AFZ, whereas the horizontal axis indicates the stages of pregnancy and types of
tissue samples for the genes (A and B) MX1-a, (C and D) MX1B, and (E
and F) MX2. IC, intercaruncular endometrium; C, caruncular endometrium; P, fetal
placenta. The numbers 14–18, 25–40, 50–70, 80–100, and 130–150 indicate the number of pregnancy days for
each subgroup. All data are shown as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Asterisks indicate
significant differences (** P < 0.01; * P < 0.05) among pregnancy stages, and letters indicate
significant differences (P < 0.05) among three tissues as determined by ANOVA, followed by the
Fisher’s PLSD procedure as the multiple comparison test. Additionally, a number sign
(#) indicates a tendency for significant differences (P < 0.1).
Expression of MX1-a, MX1B and MX2 mRNA in uterine and fetal placental tissues at mid pregnancy
Comparison of the expression levels in IC, C and P tissues revealed that MX1-a expression
was significantly higher in IC tissue than in C or P tissues at days 80–100 and higher than in P tissues on
days 130–150 (Fig. 1B; P < 0.05). The C and P tissues showed
different tendencies with respect to expression at days 80–100, and the IC and C tissues showed different
tendencies at days 130–150 (P < 0.1). MX2 expression in the IC tissues was higher than in
the P tissue at days 50–70 and higher than in either C or P tissues at days 80–100 (Fig. 1F; P < 0.05). The expression of MX2 in the IC tissues also
tended to be higher at days 50–70 in the C tissue (P < 0.1). No significant difference was observed in
MX1B expression (Fig. 1D).Comparison of the levels at days 50–70, 80–100 and 130–150 revealed that MX1-a expression in
the IC tissue increased significantly at days 80–100 followed by a significant decrease (Fig. 1B; P < 0.05). The expression pattern of MX1-a and
MX2 in the P tissue was similar; MX1-a expression in the P tissue at days
130–150 was significantly higher than at days 50–70 and 80–100 (Fig.
1B; P < 0.05), and MX2 expression in the P tissue at days 130–150 tended to be
higher than at days 50–70 and 80–100 (Fig. 1F; P < 0.1).
Expressions of the mRNA of IFN-α and IFN pathway-related genes (IFNAR1, IFNAR2, IRF3 and IRF9) in uterine
and fetal placental tissues during pregnancy
Comparison of the expression levels of IFN-α mRNA among days 14–18, 25–40, 50–70, 80–100 and
130–150 revealed that IFN-α showed a scattered gene expression pattern; nevertheless, its
expression in the IC tissue was significantly higher (P < 0.05) at days 50–70 than at days 14–18, 25–40 and
130–150 (Fig. 2A). The mRNA expression level of IFN-α in the C was not significantly different (Fig. 2B). In the P tissue, IFN-α was only minimally
expressed during mid pregnancy (Fig. 2C).
Fig. 2.
Expression of IFN-α mRNA in the endometrium and fetal placenta in the pre- and
postimplantation stages. The vertical line shows the relative expression levels of mRNA using qRT-PCR,
standardized with the reference gene H2AFZ, whereas the horizontal axis indicates the
stages of pregnancy for (A) IFN-α in IC tissues, (B) IFN-α in C
tissues and (C) IFN-α in P tissues, respectively. IC, intercaruncular endometrium; C,
caruncular endometrium; P, fetal placenta. The numbers 14–18, 25–40, 50–70, 80–100 and 130–150 indicate
the number of days of pregnancy for each subgroup. All data are shown as the mean ± standard error of
the mean (SEM). Letters (P < 0.05) indicate significant differences determined by ANOVA, followed by
the Fisher’s PLSD procedure as the multiple comparison test.
Expression of IFN-α mRNA in the endometrium and fetal placenta in the pre- and
postimplantation stages. The vertical line shows the relative expression levels of mRNA using qRT-PCR,
standardized with the reference gene H2AFZ, whereas the horizontal axis indicates the
stages of pregnancy for (A) IFN-α in IC tissues, (B) IFN-α in C
tissues and (C) IFN-α in P tissues, respectively. IC, intercaruncular endometrium; C,
caruncular endometrium; P, fetal placenta. The numbers 14–18, 25–40, 50–70, 80–100 and 130–150 indicate
the number of days of pregnancy for each subgroup. All data are shown as the mean ± standard error of
the mean (SEM). Letters (P < 0.05) indicate significant differences determined by ANOVA, followed by
the Fisher’s PLSD procedure as the multiple comparison test.The expression of type I IFN receptors (IFNAR1 and IFNAR2) and type I IFN
regulatory factors (IRF3 and IRF9) was detected in all pregnant uterine and
fetal placental tissues by RT-PCR analysis (Fig. 3). Thus, not only IFN-a but also IFN signaling pathway-related genes were expressed in
IC, C and P tissues during pregnancy.
Fig. 3.
Expression of IFNAR1, IFNAR2, IRF3 and
IRF9 in the endometrium and fetal placenta in the pre- and postimplantation stages.
The figure shows the expression of type I IFN receptor (IFNAR1 and
IFNAR2) and type I IFN regulatory factor (IRF3 and
IRF9) mRNA in pregnant uterine and placental tissues by RT-PCR. IC, intercaruncular
endometrium; C, caruncular endometrium; P, fetal placenta. The numbers 14–18, 25–40, 50–70, 80–100 and
130–150 indicate the number of days of pregnancy for each subgroup. H2AFZ was used as
the internal control gene.
Expression of IFNAR1, IFNAR2, IRF3 and
IRF9 in the endometrium and fetal placenta in the pre- and postimplantation stages.
The figure shows the expression of type I IFN receptor (IFNAR1 and
IFNAR2) and type I IFN regulatory factor (IRF3 and
IRF9) mRNA in pregnant uterine and placental tissues by RT-PCR. IC, intercaruncular
endometrium; C, caruncular endometrium; P, fetal placenta. The numbers 14–18, 25–40, 50–70, 80–100 and
130–150 indicate the number of days of pregnancy for each subgroup. H2AFZ was used as
the internal control gene.
Discussion
In this study, to determine whether bovineMX1-a, MX1B and
MX2 genes were expressed in uterine and fetal placental tissues after implantation, we
evaluated the expression of each MX mRNA in three different tissues (IC, C and P) during five
pregnancy stages (days 14–18, 25–40, 50–70, 80–100 and 130–150) by qRT-PCR. MX1-a,
MX1B and MX2 were expressed not only in the endometrium (IC and C) but also
in the P at each pregnancy stage. The relative expression levels of each MX mRNA in both the IC
and C were higher at days 14–18 than at the other stages. The expression of MX genes is induced
by stimulation with IFN-τ, which is secreted from the trophoblast of the conceptus cells during pregnancy days
14 to 21 in ruminants [1]. MX genes induced by IFN-τ at
preimplantation may play a role in pregnancy recognition or uterine reception. It has also been suggested that
MX1 is involved in the immune response and in cell adhesion at implantation [10]. Therefore, MX genes may play a role in cell adhesion
mechanisms between the mother and fetus, such as conceptus attachment to the endometrium.Although MX expressions decreased from days 14–18 to days 25–40, these expressions continued
to change during mid pregnancy. Since IFN-τ secretion by the conceptus decreases after establishment of
implantation, it was thought that MX1-a, MX1B and MX2 mRNA
after implantation might be induced by another type I IFN such as IFN-α/β. To determine whether
MX expression correlated with the type I IFN signaling pathway, we focused on the mRNA of
IFN-α, type I IFN receptors (IFNAR1 and IFNAR2) and type I
IFN regulatory factors (IRF3 and IRF9). IFN-α mRNA was
expressed in all pregnancy tissues. In particular, IFN-α expression in IC tissue was
significantly higher at days 50–70. This result correlated with the upregulation of MX1-a and
MX2 expression at days 80–100. IFN-α is transcribed by IRF3 and affects the JAK-STAT
signaling pathway via IFNAR1 and IFNAR2 receptors, which is followed by expression of ISGs induced by IRF9
[15, 16]. Detection of
IFNAR1, IFNAR2, IRF3 and IRF9 mRNA
indicates that this cascade stimulates MX1-a, MX1B and MX2
mRNA even during pregnancy for the regulation of immune tolerance.MX1-a, MX1B and MX2 mRNA were expressed in the IC, C, and P
on days 50–70, 80–100, and 130–150 during the placental formation phase. When comparing tissues (IC, C and P),
the relative expression levels of MX1-a (days 80–100 and 130–150) and MX2
(days 50–70 and 80–100) were significantly higher in the IC tissue than the P tissues. Thus, there was a
tendency for the expression of the above genes to decrease in the P of fetal tissue than the IC of maternal
tissue. Immune tolerance is required for successful pregnancy in any viviparous animal. In cows, decrease of
expression of major histocompatibility proteins by the trophoblast, recruitment of macrophages to the uterus and
modulation of immune-related genes contribute to the uterine immunosuppressive environment [26]. Immune tolerance between the mother and fetus is unbalanced when the
uterus is infected with pathogens [27,28,29]. During pregnancy as well as non-pregnancy conditions,
the TLRs—a major family of PRRs—are expressed in the uterus. The levels of TLR2, 3, 4, 6 and 9 are higher in the
interplacentomal endometrium than in the placentome [26]. The present
results suggest that pregnant cows may weakly modulate the immune response in the caruncular and placental
tissues, where maternal tissue is in contact with fetal tissue; in contrast, a stronger immune response in the
intercaruncular tissue that is not in contact with fetal tissue would protect the mother and fetus from
pathogens.Moreover, MX1-a and MX2 expression in the P tissue had a tendency to increase
with the progress of pregnancy, although a significant difference was not recognized for MX1B
expression, which has no antiviral activity against VSV. This indicates that immunity of the fetus may develop
with the progression of pregnancy. Fetal immunity is formed from 80 to 120 days of pregnancy; hence, immune
system maturation is not completed until about 120 days of gestation [30,
31]. Infection with bovine viral diarrhea virus prior to sufficient
development of the fetal immune system causes abortion or calving of a persistent infected calf, which results
in immunological tolerance [30, 31]. The expression of MX1-a in IC tissue increased at days 80–100, followed by a
decrease at days 130–150. We suggest that the maternal innate immune response is active in the presence of an
undeveloped fetal immune system until fetal immunity develops, at which time the maternal immune response then
weakens.Recently, it was shown that ovine MX1 protein was located within exosomes secreted by uterine epithelial cells
[32]. Exosomes are extracellular vesicles containing and transporting
proteins, mRNA and miRNA and are necessary for intercellular communication. Exosomes are mainly produced by
immune, epithelial and tumor cells [33]. In humans, it has been shown
that the syncytiotrophoblast cells in the placenta constitutively secrete exosomes during pregnancy [34, 35]. These exosomes, derived from
the human placenta, are secreted into the maternal bloodstream and enable cross talk between the mother and
child—namely, transport of substances such as proteins and RNA molecules [35]. In sheep, the exosomes secreted by uterine epithelial cells incorporate the MX1 protein [32]. This might also be applicable to cows in ruminants; bovineMX1 protein
transported inside exosomes may play a role in fetal-maternal communication as well as in humans. The MX protein
belongs to the dynamin superfamily of GTPases, and therefore, it is suggested that MX may play a role in
intracellular transport and endocytosis in addition to having antiviral activity [36,37,38,39]. Ovine MX1 protein in uterine glandular epithelial cells interacts with
tubulin β; this suggests that MX1 could play a role in transporting proteins or vesicles via secretion and
mitosis [40]. MX may function in exosome secretion by uterine epithelial
cells or serve as transporter.Our findings reveal that three isoforms of bovine MX genes as well as the IFN signaling
pathway-related genes, IFN-α, type I IFN receptors and type I IFN regulatory factors, are
expressed in the IC, C and P tissues throughout pregnancy up to day 150. In the mid-pregnancy stages, the IC
showed comparatively higher expressions of MX genes. Hence, in IC tissue that does not form a
P, the mother regulates the immune response to defeat infections to protect the uterus and fetus. Consequently,
it has been suggested that bovine MX genes are induced by IFN-α instead of IFN-τ after
implantation, which indicates the need for the immune response to protect both the mother and embryo even during
the placental development phase and maternal immune suppression.
Authors: H A E Babiker; Y Nakatsu; K Yamada; A Yoneda; A Takada; J Ueda; H Hata; T Watanabe Journal: Immunogenetics Date: 2006-11-21 Impact factor: 2.846
Authors: L J Oliveira; R S N Barreto; F Perecin; N Mansouri-Attia; F T V Pereira; F V Meirelles Journal: Reprod Domest Anim Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 2.005
Authors: T L Ott; J Yin; A A Wiley; H T Kim; B Gerami-Naini; T E Spencer; F F Bartol; R C Burghardt; F W Bazer Journal: Biol Reprod Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 4.285
Authors: Xiang Zhou; Jennifer J Michal; Lifan Zhang; Bo Ding; Joan K Lunney; Bang Liu; Zhihua Jiang Journal: Int J Biol Sci Date: 2013-02-11 Impact factor: 6.580
Authors: Benjamin R Crites; Sarah N Carr; Leslie H Anderson; James C Matthews; Phillip J Bridges Journal: J Anim Sci Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 3.338