AIMS: The targeted genetic screening of Sudden Arrhythmic Death Syndrome (SADS) probands in a molecular autopsy has a diagnostic yield of up to 35%. Exome sequencing has the potential to improve this yield. The primary aim of this study is to examine the feasibility and diagnostic utility of targeted exome screening in SADS victims, utilizing familial clinical screening whenever possible. METHODS AND RESULTS: To determine the feasibility and diagnostic yield of targeted exome sequencing deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was isolated from 59 SADS victims (mean age 25 years, range 1-51 years). Targeted exome sequencing of 135 genes associated with cardiomyopathies and ion channelopathies was performed on the Illumina HiSeq2000 platform. Non-synonymous, loss-of-function, and splice-site variants with a minor allele frequency <0.02% in the NHLBI exome sequencing project and an internal set of control exomes were prioritized for analysis followed by <0.5% frequency threshold secondary analysis. First-degree relatives were offered clinical screening for inherited cardiac conditions. Seven probands (12%) carried very rare (<0.02%) or novel non-sense candidate mutations and 10 probands (17%) had previously published rare (0.02-0.5%) candidate mutations-a total yield of 29%. Co-segregation fully confirmed two private SCN5A Na channel mutations. Variants of unknown significance were detected in a further 34% of probands. CONCLUSION: Molecular autopsy using targeted exome sequencing has a relatively low diagnostic yield of very rare potentially disease causing mutations. Candidate pathogenic variants with a higher frequency in control populations are relatively common and should be interpreted with caution. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: The targeted genetic screening of Sudden Arrhythmic Death Syndrome (SADS) probands in a molecular autopsy has a diagnostic yield of up to 35%. Exome sequencing has the potential to improve this yield. The primary aim of this study is to examine the feasibility and diagnostic utility of targeted exome screening in SADS victims, utilizing familial clinical screening whenever possible. METHODS AND RESULTS: To determine the feasibility and diagnostic yield of targeted exome sequencing deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was isolated from 59 SADS victims (mean age 25 years, range 1-51 years). Targeted exome sequencing of 135 genes associated with cardiomyopathies and ion channelopathies was performed on the Illumina HiSeq2000 platform. Non-synonymous, loss-of-function, and splice-site variants with a minor allele frequency <0.02% in the NHLBI exome sequencing project and an internal set of control exomes were prioritized for analysis followed by <0.5% frequency threshold secondary analysis. First-degree relatives were offered clinical screening for inherited cardiac conditions. Seven probands (12%) carried very rare (<0.02%) or novel non-sense candidate mutations and 10 probands (17%) had previously published rare (0.02-0.5%) candidate mutations-a total yield of 29%. Co-segregation fully confirmed two private SCN5A Na channel mutations. Variants of unknown significance were detected in a further 34% of probands. CONCLUSION: Molecular autopsy using targeted exome sequencing has a relatively low diagnostic yield of very rare potentially disease causing mutations. Candidate pathogenic variants with a higher frequency in control populations are relatively common and should be interpreted with caution. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: B Risgaard; R Jabbari; L Refsgaard; A G Holst; S Haunsø; A Sadjadieh; B G Winkel; M S Olesen; J Tfelt-Hansen Journal: Clin Genet Date: 2013-03-11 Impact factor: 4.438
Authors: John Gomes; Malcolm Finlay; Akbar K Ahmed; Edward J Ciaccio; Angeliki Asimaki; Jeffrey E Saffitz; Giovanni Quarta; Muriel Nobles; Petros Syrris; Sanjay Chaubey; William J McKenna; Andrew Tinker; Pier D Lambiase Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-01-11 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Morten S Olesen; Niels F Jensen; Anders G Holst; Jonas B Nielsen; Jacob Tfelt-Hansen; Thomas Jespersen; Ahmad Sajadieh; Stig Haunsø; Jens T Lund; Kirstine Calloe; Nicole Schmitt; Jesper Hastrup Svendsen Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2011-05-28 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: I Splawski; J Shen; K W Timothy; M H Lehmann; S Priori; J L Robinson; A J Moss; P J Schwartz; J A Towbin; G M Vincent; M T Keating Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-09-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Julia Rankin; Michaela Auer-Grumbach; Warwick Bagg; Kevin Colclough; Thuy Duong Nguyen; Jane Fenton-May; Andrew Hattersley; Judith Hudson; Philip Jardine; Dragana Josifova; Cheryl Longman; Robert McWilliam; Katharine Owen; Mark Walker; Manfred Wehnert; Sian Ellard Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2008-06-15 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: P G Postema; I Christiaans; N Hofman; M Alders; T T Koopmann; C R Bezzina; P Loh; K Zeppenfeld; P G A Volders; A A M Wilde Journal: Neth Heart J Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 2.380
Authors: Goncalo R Abecasis; Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Mark A DePristo; Richard M Durbin; Robert E Handsaker; Hyun Min Kang; Gabor T Marth; Gil A McVean Journal: Nature Date: 2012-11-01 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Oscar Campuzano; Olallo Sanchez-Molero; Anna Fernandez; Irene Mademont-Soler; Monica Coll; Alexandra Perez-Serra; Jesus Mates; Bernat Del Olmo; Ferran Pico; Laia Nogue-Navarro; Georgia Sarquella-Brugada; Anna Iglesias; Sergi Cesar; Esther Carro; Juan Carlos Borondo; Josep Brugada; Josep Castellà; Jordi Medallo; Ramon Brugada Journal: Sports Med Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Mercedes Iglesias; Tomas Ripoll-Vera; Consuelo Perez-Luengo; Ana Belen García; Susana Moyano; Juan Carlos Canos; Juan Carlos Borondo; Jorge Alvarez; Damian Heine-Suñer; Bernardino Barcelo Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-04-21 Impact factor: 4.241