| Literature DB >> 26494145 |
Dandan Qin1,2, Jing Dong3,4, Fuchao Xu5,6, Ganggang Guo7, Shuangtao Ge8,9, Qing Xu10,11, Yuxin Xu12, Meifang Li13,14.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Leaf color variations are common in plants. Herein we describe a natural mutant of barley cultivar Edamai No.6, whs18, whose leaf color showed stable and inheritable stage-green-revertible-albino under field condition.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26494145 PMCID: PMC4619012 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-015-2015-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Fig. 1The dynamic leaf color variation of whs18 under field condition. a Etiolated leaf b Albino leaf c Strip white leaf d Stereo leaf color performance
Fig. 2The phenotype of whs18 under different temperature treatment. a T1: whs18 grown inside or outside of incubator b T2: whs18 grown inside or outside of plastic membrane c T3-1: whs18 sowed at different date d T3-2: whs18 sowed at different date
Comparison of agronomic traits between Edamai No. 6 and whs18 (p = 0.05)
| HD | PL(cm) | SNP | LS(cm) | GNS | WTG(g) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edamai No. 6 | Mar.21 | 77.4 | 6.7 | 7.1 | 33.3 | 43.6 |
|
| Mar.29 | 67.0a | 5.3a | 6.3a | 31.2 | 38.3a |
HD Heading Date, PL Plant Height, SNP Spike Number per Plant, LS Length of the main Spike, GNS Grain Number of the main Spike, WTG Weight of 1000 Grains
aIndicated that there was significant difference between Edamai No.6 and whs18 at the level of 0.05
Concentration of chlorophylls in Edamai No.6 and whs18
| ChlorophyIIs (mg/g) | GL | EL | AL | SW | FL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total chlorophyII | Edamai No.6 | 1.417 ± 0.063 | 1.582 ± 0.131 | 1.340 ± 0.036 | 1.34 ± 0.036 | 1.772 ± 0.072 |
|
| 1.283 ± 0.073a | 0.828 ± 0.094b | 0.091 ± 0.009b | 0.564 ± 0.049b | 1.533 ± 0.060a | |
| ChlorophyIIa | Edamai No.6 | 1.194 ± 0.053 | 1.330 ± 0.168 | 1.071 ± 0.032 | 1.071 ± 0.032 | 1.408 ± 0.065 |
|
| 0.976 ± 0.049a | 0.701 ± 0.082b | 0.085 ± 0.007b | 0.424 ± 0.040b | 1.257 ± 0.056a | |
| ChlorophyIIb | Edamai No.6 | 0.271 ± 0.009 | 0.253 ± 0.068 | 0.268 ± 0.011 | 0.268 ± 0.011 | 0.364 ± 0.011 |
|
| 0.245 ± 0.033 | 0.127 ± 0.069b | 0.006 ± 0.003b | 0.140 ± 0.113b | 0.324 ± 0.075 |
GL Green Leaf at the seedling stage, EL Etiolated Leaf, AL Albinistic Leaf, SW Stripe White leaf, FL Flag Leaf
aIndicated that there was significant difference between Edmai No.6 and whs18 at the level of p = 0.05
bIndicated that there was significant difference between Edmai No.6 and whs18 at the level of p = 0.01
Fig. 3Ultrastructure of chloroplast of Edamai No.6 and whs18 at different developmental stages. a Edamai No.6 at etiolated stage, b Edamai No.6 at albino stage, c Flag leaf of Edamai No.6 d Etiolated leaf of whs18, e Albinistic leaf of whs18, f Flag leaf of whs18
Genetic analysis of the albino mutant
| Cross | No. of normal plant | No. of mutant plant | Expected ratio | Calculated ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Edamai No.9706 × | 397 | 117 | 3:1 | 1.37 |
| Edamai No.934 × | 266 | 94 | 3:1 | 0.24 |
|
| 221 | 65 | 3:1 | 0.79 |
|
| 164 | 51 | 3:1 | 0.19 |
Fig. 4Mapping of HvSGRA gene. (a) Primary mapping of HvSGRA (b) Fine mapping of HvSGRA (c) Physical mapping of HvSGRA
Fig. 5Genotype of the two parents and lines from the derived F2 population. Lane1: Edamai No.9706, Lane2:whs18, Lane3-4: Wild-type lines, L5-13: Mutant Lines
Putative genes in the candidate region
| Morex_contig | FP_contig | HC_genes_CDS | Gene annotation |
|---|---|---|---|
| morex_contig_160711 | contig_34437 | AK249799.1 | fructokinase-1-like (partial sequence) |
| morex_contig_244330 | contig_34437 | AK372445 | cytochrome p450 (partial sequence) |
| morex_contig_67200 | contig_34437 | MLOC_75134.1 | cytochrome p450 (full length) |
| morex_contig_1592730 | contig_46434 | AK356172 | uncharacterized protein (partial sequence) |
| morex_contig_6591 | contig_46434 | AK369630 | cbs domain containing protein (partial sequence) |
| morex_contig_138067 | contig_46434 | MLOC_6767.1 | Laccase (full length) |
Fig. 6Sequence comparison of the third extron of HvFLN1 gene between Edamai No.6 and whs18. The red * indicated the SNP that generated the premature stop codon in whs18
Fig. 7Homology analysis of fructokinase and fructokinase-like proteins in plant. “red circle symbol” indicated the FLNs proteins, “red triangle symbol” indicated the FRKs proteins