| Literature DB >> 26493216 |
Mariusz Zuberek1, Dominika Wojciechowska2, Damian Krzyzanowski3, Sylwia Meczynska-Wielgosz4, Marcin Kruszewski5,6,7, Agnieszka Grzelak8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The increasing body of evidence suggest that nanomaterials toxicity is associated with generation of oxidative stress. In this paper we investigated the role of respiration in silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) generated oxidative stress and toxicity. Since cancer cells rely on glucose as the main source of energy supply, glucose availability might be an important determinant of NPs toxicity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26493216 PMCID: PMC4618757 DOI: 10.1186/s12951-015-0132-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nanobiotechnology ISSN: 1477-3155 Impact factor: 10.435
Hydrodynamic diameter, zeta potential and aggregation over 2 h of silver nanoparticles used in this work of nominal size 20 nm
| Time (h) | Hydrodynamic diameter (nm) | Polydispersity index | Zeta potential (mV) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 160.3 ± 2.1 | 0.31 ± 0.04 | −47.6 ± 0.5 |
| 0.5 | 156.1 ± 5.3 | 0.31 ± 0.03 | |
| 1 | 160.5 ± 3.4 | 0.30 ± 0.01 | |
| 2 | 151.8 ± 4.2a | 0.30 ± 0.03 |
Results are presented as a mean ± SD. Means were compared by Student’s t test (n = 3)
aDenotes statistically important difference from the control (time 0 h)
Fig. 1Toxicity of AgNPs (2.5–50 µg/cm3) for HepG2 cells cultured in the high- or low-glucose medium. Curves were compared with extra sum of square F test, p = 0.0007, N = 12 (5.5 mM glucose for 30 days, 25 mM glucose) and 9 [5.5 mM glucose (48 h)]. Graphed points represent means with SD
The AgNP concentrations necessary to induce cell death at the given survival level
| Dead cells % | AgNP concentrations necessary to induce cell death at the given survival level (µg/cm3) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| High glucose culture | Low glucose culture (24 h) | Low glucose culture (30 days) | |
| 10b | 1.81 ± 0.41 | 2.52 ± 0.57 | 13.84 ± 2.05 |
| 25b | 4.60 ± 0.58 | 5.82 ± 0.73 | 22.91 ± 1.93 |
| 50b | 11.70 ± 0.93 | 13.45 ± 1.15 | 37.94 ± 7.63 |
| 75a | 29.75 ± 4.46 | 31.06 ± 4.99 | 62.83 ± 22.235 |
| 90a | 75,61 ± 19.35 | 71.77 ± 19.33 | 104 ± 21.63 |
Values of each IC were compared by ANOVA accompanied by Tukey’s post test
Values represent means ± half of respective confidence intrerval, α = 0.05, n = 3
aDenotes statistically important difference between low glucose (30 days) and other cultures
bMeans that viability of each culture differs from other two
Fig. 2Influence of extracellular H2O2 on fluorescence intensity of reporter protein HyPer-Mito in HepG2 cells cultured on high glucose medium. Marked points represent mean ± SD, N = 3
Fig. 3Generation of H2O2 in mitochondria measured with HyPer-mito in HepG2 cells growing on high glucose (a) and low glucose medium (b) in the presence of 25 μg/cm3 AgNPs. Extracellular H2O2 (25 μM) was used as a positive control. Results were normalized versus control (untreated cells) and statistical importance of differences was calculated with ANOVA accompanied by Tukey`s post hoc test. # indicates statistically important difference from the respective control, p < 0.05, N = 3. * denotes statistically important difference between AgNPs treated cell and the respective positive control, p < 0.05, N = 3. Values represent means with SD
Expression of genes involved in redox regulation in cells
| Up-regulation | Down-regulation | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene | Expression | 95 % CI | Gene | Expression | 95 % CI | Gene | Expression | 95 % CI | Gene | Expression | 95 % CI |
| GSTM5 | 72,004 | 67.62–76.43 | GPX3 | 2.199 | 1.88–2.48 | CSDE1 | 0.801 | 0.69–0.92 | NCF2 | 0.626 | 0.57–0.69 |
| ALB | 8.574 | 8.17–9.24 | DUOX1 | 1.853 | 1.29–2.68 | GSS | 0.79 | 0.619–0.990 | TXNRD2 | 0.564 | 0.48–0.67 |
| MBL2 | 4.511 | 3.92–5.50 | EPHX2 | 1.832 | 1.66–2.13 | OXSR1 | 0.765 | 0.63–0.97 | EPX | 0.354 | 0.16–0.65 |
| SCARA3 | 3.547 | 1.32–5.23 | NUDT1 | 1.803 | 1.26–2.57 | AOX1 | 0.758 | 0.64–0.85 | PRNP | 0.334 | 0.27–0.42 |
| CAT | 3.531 | 2.47–5.30 | PRDX-1 | 1.713 | 1.32–2.22 | SRXN1 | 0.734 | 0.56–0.89 | CYGB | 0.325 | 0.29–0.36 |
| NCF1 | 2.908 | 1.52–5.91 | PNKP | 1.295 | 1.14–1.49 | KRT1 | 0.704 | 0.53–0.98 | MPV17 | 0.289 | 0.20–0.42 |
| GSTT1 | 2.688 | 2.32–3.25 | NUDT2 | 1.275 | 1.12–1.51 | GSTZ1 | 0.702 | 0.53–0.92 | PRDX3 | 0.227 | 0.09–0.56 |
| GSTM3 | 2.389 | 1.94–3.03 | TTN | 1.254 | 1.12–1.43 | GSTA4 | 0.686 | 0.60–0.82 | NME5 | 0.138 | 0.09–0.19 |
| SGk2 | 2.335 | 2.09–2.55 | CYBA | 1.24 | 1.17–1.32 | GPX7 | 0.657 | 0.58–0.77 | PREX1 | 0.108 | 0.07–0.20 |
| GLRX | 2.303 | 1.22–6.16 | GSTM2 | 1.143 | 1.03–1.32 | SOD1 | 0.657 | 0.45–0.92 | |||
Results are presented as fold change of expression in HepG2 cells cultured on low glucose relative to expression in HepG2 cells cultured on high glucose along with 95 % confidence intervals. Only statistically important results were combined in this table (p < 0.05)
Enzymatic activity of the key players of cellular antioxidative defence
| Enzyme | Activity (u/mg protein) | |
|---|---|---|
| 25 mM glucose | 5.5 mM glucose | |
| Catalase | 75.19 ± 6.62 | 89.81 ± 7a |
| Glutathione S–transferase | 0.97 ± 0.16 | 1.64 ± 0.26a |
| Superoxide dismutase | 582 ± 75.2 | 803 ± 87.5a |
| Glutathione reductase | 9.21 ± 1.59 | 12.94 ± 1.19a |
Enzyme activities were compared with t test (n = 4, α = 0.05)
aDenotes statistical important difference between HepG2 cells cultured on high glucose medium and low glucose medium for 30 days. Values represent means with standard deviation