Literature DB >> 24068037

Genotoxic and carcinogenic potential of engineered nanoparticles: an update.

Ashutosh Kumar1, Alok Dhawan2,3.   

Abstract

Nanoscience and nanotechnology have seen an exponential growth over the past decade largely due to the unique properties of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs), advances in ENP synthesis, and imaging or analysis tools. The unique properties such as high surface area to volume ratio, abundant reactive sites on the surface, large fraction of atoms located on the exterior face have made these novel materials the most sought after for consumer and industrial applications. This significant increase in the ENP containing consumer products has also enhanced the chances of human and environmental exposure. Humans get exposed to ENPs at various steps of its synthesis (laboratory), manufacture (industry), use (consumer products, devices, medicines, etc.) and through the environment (contaminated water, aerosolized particles, and disposal). Such exposures to ENPs are known to induce genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and carcinogenicity in biological system. This is attributed to several factors, such as direct interaction of ENPs with the genetic material, indirect damage due to reactive oxygen species generation, release of toxic ions from soluble ENPs, interaction with cytoplasmic/nuclear proteins, binding with mitotic spindle or its components, increased oxidative stress, disturbance of cell cycle checkpoint functions, inhibition of antioxidant defense, and many others. The present review describes an overview of in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity studies with ENPs, advantages and potential problems associated with the methods used in genotoxicity assessment, and the need for appropriate method and approach for risk assessment of ENPs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24068037     DOI: 10.1007/s00204-013-1128-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Toxicol        ISSN: 0340-5761            Impact factor:   5.153


  20 in total

1.  Evaluation of tumorigenic potential of CeO2 and Fe2O3 engineered nanoparticles by a human cell in vitro screening model.

Authors:  Todd A Stueckle; Donna C Davidson; Raymond Derk; Tiffany G Kornberg; Diane Schwegler-Berry; Sandra V Pirela; Glen Deloid; Philip Demokritou; Sudjit Luanpitpong; Yon Rojanasakul; Liying Wang
Journal:  NanoImpact       Date:  2016-11-22

Review 2.  Health implications of engineered nanoparticles in infants and children.

Authors:  Song Tang; Mao Wang; Kaylyn E Germ; Hua-Mao Du; Wen-Jie Sun; Wei-Min Gao; Gregory D Mayer
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 2.764

Review 3.  Smart micro/nanoparticles in stimulus-responsive drug/gene delivery systems.

Authors:  Mahdi Karimi; Amir Ghasemi; Parham Sahandi Zangabad; Reza Rahighi; S Masoud Moosavi Basri; H Mirshekari; M Amiri; Z Shafaei Pishabad; A Aslani; M Bozorgomid; D Ghosh; A Beyzavi; A Vaseghi; A R Aref; L Haghani; S Bahrami; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 54.564

4.  Flow cytometry for intracellular SPION quantification: specificity and sensitivity in comparison with spectroscopic methods.

Authors:  Ralf P Friedrich; Christina Janko; Marina Poettler; Philipp Tripal; Jan Zaloga; Iwona Cicha; Stephan Dürr; Johannes Nowak; Stefan Odenbach; Ioana Slabu; Maik Liebl; Lutz Trahms; Marcus Stapf; Ingrid Hilger; Stefan Lyer; Christoph Alexiou
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-06-26

5.  Micro- and Nanosized Particles in Nasal Mucosa: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Lenka Čábalová; Kristina Čabanová; Hana Bielniková; Jana Kukutschová; Jana Dvořáčková; Kateřina Dědková; Karol Zeleník; Pavel Komínek
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Current investigations into the genotoxicity of zinc oxide and silica nanoparticles in mammalian models in vitro and in vivo: carcinogenic/genotoxic potential, relevant mechanisms and biomarkers, artifacts, and limitations.

Authors:  Jee Young Kwon; Preeyaporn Koedrith; Young Rok Seo
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-12-15

7.  Identification of carcinogens by a selected panel of DNA damage response associated genes.

Authors:  Regina Stöber
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.068

Review 8.  Nanoparticles: Weighing the Pros and Cons from an Eco-genotoxicological Perspective.

Authors:  Preeyaporn Koedrith; Md Mujibur Rahman; Yu Jin Jang; Dong Yeop Shin; Young Rok Seo
Journal:  J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-06-30

9.  Gebel-criteria for risk assessment in nanotoxicology.

Authors:  Seddik Hammad; Ahmed M Abdou; Mosaab A Omar
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 4.068

10.  Glucose availability determines silver nanoparticles toxicity in HepG2.

Authors:  Mariusz Zuberek; Dominika Wojciechowska; Damian Krzyzanowski; Sylwia Meczynska-Wielgosz; Marcin Kruszewski; Agnieszka Grzelak
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 10.435

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.