Literature DB >> 22716168

Hospital and surgeon variation in complications and repeat surgery following incident lumbar fusion for common degenerative diagnoses.

Brook I Martin1, Sohail K Mirza, Gary M Franklin, Jon D Lurie, Todd A MacKenzie, Richard A Deyo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that account for variation in complication rates across hospitals and surgeons performing lumbar spinal fusion surgery. DATA SOURCES: Discharge registry including all nonfederal hospitals in Washington State from 2004 to 2007. STUDY
DESIGN: We identified adults (n = 6,091) undergoing an initial inpatient lumbar fusion for degenerative conditions. We identified whether each patient had a subsequent complication within 90 days. Logistic regression models with hospital and surgeon random effects were used to examine complications, controlling for patient characteristics and comorbidity. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Complications within 90 days of a fusion occurred in 4.8 percent of patients, and 2.2 percent had a reoperation. Hospital effects accounted for 8.8 percent of the total variability, and surgeon effects account for 14.4 percent. Surgeon factors account for 54.5 percent of the variation in hospital reoperation rates, and 47.2 percent of the variation in hospital complication rates. The discretionary use of operative features, such as the inclusion of bone morphogenetic proteins, accounted for 30 and 50 percent of the variation in surgeons' reoperation and complication rates, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: To improve the safety of lumbar spinal fusion surgery, quality improvement efforts that focus on surgeons' discretionary use of operative techniques may be more effective than those that target hospitals. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22716168      PMCID: PMC3465627          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01434.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  28 in total

1.  Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial.

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Tor D Tosteson; Jon D Lurie; Anna N A Tosteson; Brett Hanscom; Jonathan S Skinner; William A Abdu; Alan S Hilibrand; Scott D Boden; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Association between compensation status and outcome after surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ian Harris; Jonathan Mulford; Michael Solomon; James M van Gelder; Jane Young
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-04-06       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Reoperation rates following lumbar spine surgery and the influence of spinal fusion procedures.

Authors:  Brook I Martin; Sohail K Mirza; Bryan A Comstock; Darryl T Gray; William Kreuter; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis.

Authors:  H N Herkowitz; L T Kurz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Mortality after lumbar fusion surgery.

Authors:  Sham Maghout Juratli; Sohail K Mirza; Deborah Fulton-Kehoe; Thomas M Wickizer; Gary M Franklin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Repeat surgery after lumbar decompression for herniated disc: the quality implications of hospital and surgeon variation.

Authors:  Brook I Martin; Sohail K Mirza; David R Flum; Thomas M Wickizer; Patrick J Heagerty; Alex F Lenkoski; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group.

Authors:  Peter Fritzell; Olle Hägg; Per Wessberg; Anders Nordwall
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Vijaya Sundararajan; Patricia Halfon; Andrew Fong; Bernard Burnand; Jean-Christophe Luthi; L Duncan Saunders; Cynthia A Beck; Thomas E Feasby; William A Ghali
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Using the spine surgical invasiveness index to identify risk of surgical site infection: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Amy M Cizik; Michael J Lee; Brook I Martin; Richard J Bransford; Carlo Bellabarba; Jens R Chapman; Sohail K Mirza
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 10.  Overtreating chronic back pain: time to back off?

Authors:  Richard A Deyo; Sohail K Mirza; Judith A Turner; Brook I Martin
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.657

View more
  19 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes after treatment with disc prostheses in three lumbar segments compared to one- or two segments.

Authors:  Svante Berg; Nina Gillberg-Aronsson
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-09-30

2.  Statewide Hospital Discharge Data: Collection, Use, Limitations, and Improvements.

Authors:  Roxanne M Andrews
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Reoperation of decompression alone or decompression plus fusion surgeries for degenerative lumbar diseases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zhao Lang; Jing-Sheng Li; Felix Yang; Yan Yu; Kamran Khan; Louis G Jenis; Thomas D Cha; James D Kang; Guoan Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Challenges in outcome measurement: clinical research perspective.

Authors:  Daniel P O'Connor; Mark R Brinker
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Use of bone morphogenetic protein among patients undergoing fusion for degenerative diagnoses in the United States, 2002 to 2012.

Authors:  Brook I Martin; Jon D Lurie; Anna N A Tosteson; Richard A Deyo; Farrokh R Farrokhi; Sohail K Mirza
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Indications for spine surgery: validation of an administrative coding algorithm to classify degenerative diagnoses.

Authors:  Brook I Martin; Jon D Lurie; Anna N A Tosteson; Richard A Deyo; Tor D Tosteson; James N Weinstein; Sohail K Mirza
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  How do coverage policies influence practice patterns, safety, and cost of initial lumbar fusion surgery? A population-based comparison of workers' compensation systems.

Authors:  Brook I Martin; Gary M Franklin; Richard A Deyo; Thomas M Wickizer; Jonathan D Lurie; Sohail K Mirza
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Lumbar Imaging With Reporting Of Epidemiology (LIRE)--Protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Jarvik; Bryan A Comstock; Kathryn T James; Andrew L Avins; Brian W Bresnahan; Richard A Deyo; Patrick H Luetmer; Janna L Friedly; Eric N Meier; Daniel C Cherkin; Laura S Gold; Sean D Rundell; Safwan S Halabi; David F Kallmes; Katherine W Tan; Judith A Turner; Larry G Kessler; Danielle C Lavallee; Kari A Stephens; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 2.226

9.  Administrative Data Are Unreliable for Ranking Hospital Performance Based on Serious Complications After Spine Fusion.

Authors:  Jacob K Greenberg; Margaret A Olsen; John Poe; Christopher F Dibble; Ken Yamaguchi; Michael P Kelly; Bruce L Hall; Wilson Z Ray
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.241

10.  Early Effects of Medicare's Bundled Payment for Care Improvement Program for Lumbar Fusion.

Authors:  Brook I Martin; Jon D Lurie; Farrokh R Farrokhi; Kevin J McGuire; Sohail K Mirza
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.