Literature DB >> 26491903

Clinical, Radiographic, and Pathologic Findings in Patients Undergoing Reoperation Following Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma.

Susannah Ellsworth1, Xiaobu Ye, Stuart A Grossman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients with glioblastoma (GBM) frequently deteriorate clinically and radiographically after chemoradiation and may require repeat surgical intervention. We attempted to correlate pathologic findings with preoperative clinical characteristics and survival in patients undergoing reoperation for GBM.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients eligible for this retrospective analysis had pathologically confirmed GBM diagnosed between 2005 and 2010, received standard radiation and temozolomide, and underwent repeat resection within 18 months of diagnosis.
RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were identified. Median age was 56 years (range, 30 to 80 y), 55% were male, and 66% had baseline performance status ≥90%. Median survival was 16.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.3-19.8) from initial surgery. At reoperation, 21% of patients had no pathologically evident tumor. Median time from initial diagnosis to second surgery was similar in patients with and without evident tumor (8.5 vs. 8.8 mo, respectively). Patients without evident tumor tended to have a worse performance status. Median overall survival from second surgery was 7 months (95% CI, 4.2-10.1) and 9.1 months (95% CI, 2.1-25.3) for patients with and without evident tumor, respectively. Multivariate proportional hazards analysis showed a hazard ratio for death of 0.61 (95% CI, 0.25-1.49) for patients without evident tumor after adjusting for Karnofsky performance status and second surgical procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: GBM patients with and without disease recurrence have similar clinical characteristics at the time of second surgical resection. Pathologic outcomes were not correlated with specific clinical or radiologic characteristics, including the time from diagnosis to reoperation. There was a trend toward improved overall survival among patients without evident tumor at reoperation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 26491903      PMCID: PMC4856584          DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  6 in total

1.  Pathologic diagnosis of recurrent glioblastoma: morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis of 20 paired cases.

Authors:  Jang-Hee Kim; Young Bae Kim; Jae Ho Han; Kyung-Gi Cho; Se-Hyuk Kim; Seung Soo Sheen; Hyun Woo Lee; Seon-Yong Jeong; Bo Young Kim; Kyi Beom Lee
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  [1H-MR Spectroscopy of brain tumors in the course of radiation therapy: Use of fast spectroscopic imaging and single-voxel spectroscopy for diagnosing recurrence].

Authors:  F Träber; W Block; S Flacke; R Lamerichs; H Schüller; H Urbach; E Keller; H H Schild
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2002-01

3.  Potential utility of conventional MRI signs in diagnosing pseudoprogression in glioblastoma.

Authors:  R J Young; A Gupta; A D Shah; J J Graber; Z Zhang; W Shi; A I Holodny; A M P Omuro
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 4.  Pseudoprogression: relevance with respect to treatment of high-grade gliomas.

Authors:  James Fink; Donald Born; Marc C Chamberlain
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2011-09

5.  MGMT promoter methylation status can predict the incidence and outcome of pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Alba A Brandes; Enrico Franceschi; Alicia Tosoni; Valeria Blatt; Annalisa Pession; Giovanni Tallini; Roberta Bertorelle; Stefania Bartolini; Fabio Calbucci; Alvaro Andreoli; Giampiero Frezza; Marco Leonardi; Federica Spagnolli; Mario Ermani
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Nomograms for predicting survival of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: prognostic factor analysis of EORTC and NCIC trial 26981-22981/CE.3.

Authors:  Thierry Gorlia; Martin J van den Bent; Monika E Hegi; René O Mirimanoff; Michael Weller; J Gregory Cairncross; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; Karl Belanger; Alba A Brandes; Anouk Allgeier; Denis Lacombe; Roger Stupp
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 41.316

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  PATZ1 Induces Apoptosis through PUMA in Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Xiang Tao; Ge Zhang; Junhui Liu; Baowei Ji; Haitao Xu; Zhibiao Chen
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.501

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.