Literature DB >> 22441548

Pathologic diagnosis of recurrent glioblastoma: morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis of 20 paired cases.

Jang-Hee Kim1, Young Bae Kim, Jae Ho Han, Kyung-Gi Cho, Se-Hyuk Kim, Seung Soo Sheen, Hyun Woo Lee, Seon-Yong Jeong, Bo Young Kim, Kyi Beom Lee.   

Abstract

To evaluate the prognostic value of the volume of residual viable tumor versus therapy-induced necrosis in resection material and the diagnostic value of ancillary tests in recurrent glioblastoma (GBM), we conducted a retrospective review of 20 patients whose initial and recurrent specimens were available. Recurrent GBMs were graded according to the extent of histopathologic parameters: recurrent tumor with high-grade, non-high-grade, and pure high-grade tumor components and therapy-related necrosis. We also examined MIB-1 labeling, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutation, and epidermal growth factor receptor amplification in primary and recurrent GBMs. To evaluate patient outcomes according to clinical and pathologic parameters, a survival analysis was performed, and correlations between histopathologic parameters and each ancillary test were assessed. Among clinical parameters, age above 60 years was associated with decreased survival (P=0.022), but other clinical parameters showed no significant association with overall survival. Among the 3 histopathologic parameters, the extent of recurrent tumor, including high-grade and non-high-grade components, revealed a significant association with overall survival (P=0.042), but neither the extent of pure high-grade components nor therapy-related necrosis showed any prognostic value. MIB-1 labeling, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutation, and epidermal growth factor receptor amplification were useful for the diagnosis of recurrent GBMs but showed no prognostic value. Our data suggest that histopathologic evaluation on the basis of tumor extent in resected recurrent GBM specimens may provide additional prognostic information on the survival of patients with recurrent GBM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22441548     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318246040c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  19 in total

1.  Serum concentrations of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) do not indicate tumor recurrence in patients with glioblastoma.

Authors:  Julia-Mareen Vietheer; Johannes Rieger; Marlies Wagner; Christian Senft; Julia Tichy; Christian Foerch
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Performance of Standardized Relative CBV for Quantifying Regional Histologic Tumor Burden in Recurrent High-Grade Glioma: Comparison against Normalized Relative CBV Using Image-Localized Stereotactic Biopsies.

Authors:  J M Hoxworth; J M Eschbacher; A C Gonzales; K W Singleton; G D Leon; K A Smith; A M Stokes; Y Zhou; G L Mazza; A B Porter; M M Mrugala; R S Zimmerman; B R Bendok; D P Patra; C Krishna; J L Boxerman; L C Baxter; K R Swanson; C C Quarles; K M Schmainda; L S Hu
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Toward a standard pathological and molecular characterization of recurrent glioma in adults: a Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology effort.

Authors:  Ali S Haider; Martin van den Bent; Patrick Y Wen; Michael A Vogelbaum; Susan Chang; Peter D Canoll; Craig M Horbinski; Jason T Huse
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Characterization of pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma: is histology the gold standard?

Authors:  Isaac Melguizo-Gavilanes; Janet M Bruner; Nandita Guha-Thakurta; Kenneth R Hess; Vinay K Puduvalli
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 5.  Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Criteria for Gliomas: Practical Approach Using Conventional and Advanced Techniques.

Authors:  D J Leao; P G Craig; L F Godoy; C C Leite; B Policeni
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Protein Analysis of Glioblastoma Primary and Posttreatment Pairs Suggests a Mesenchymal Shift at Recurrence.

Authors:  Matthew D Wood; Gerald F Reis; David E Reuss; Joanna J Phillips
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.685

7.  The combination of IDH1 mutations and MGMT methylation status predicts survival in glioblastoma better than either IDH1 or MGMT alone.

Authors:  Remco J Molenaar; Dagmar Verbaan; Simona Lamba; Carlo Zanon; Judith W M Jeuken; Sandra H E Boots-Sprenger; Pieter Wesseling; Theo J M Hulsebos; Dirk Troost; Angela A van Tilborg; Sieger Leenstra; W Peter Vandertop; Alberto Bardelli; Cornelis J F van Noorden; Fonnet E Bleeker
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 8.  Imaging of intratumoral heterogeneity in high-grade glioma.

Authors:  Leland S Hu; Andrea Hawkins-Daarud; Lujia Wang; Jing Li; Kristin R Swanson
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 8.679

9.  Histopathological correlates with survival in reoperated glioblastomas.

Authors:  Graeme F Woodworth; Tomas Garzon-Muvdi; Xiaobu Ye; Jaishri O Blakeley; Jon D Weingart; Peter C Burger
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Clinical, Radiographic, and Pathologic Findings in Patients Undergoing Reoperation Following Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Susannah Ellsworth; Xiaobu Ye; Stuart A Grossman
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.339

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.