Literature DB >> 18445844

MGMT promoter methylation status can predict the incidence and outcome of pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients.

Alba A Brandes1, Enrico Franceschi, Alicia Tosoni, Valeria Blatt, Annalisa Pession, Giovanni Tallini, Roberta Bertorelle, Stefania Bartolini, Fabio Calbucci, Alvaro Andreoli, Giampiero Frezza, Marco Leonardi, Federica Spagnolli, Mario Ermani.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Standard therapy for glioblastoma (GBM) is temozolomide (TMZ) administration, initially concurrent with radiotherapy (RT), and subsequently as maintenance therapy. The radiologic images obtained in this setting can be difficult to interpret since they may show radiation-induced pseudoprogression (psPD) rather than disease progression.
METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed GBM underwent radiotherapy plus continuous daily temozolomide (75 mg/m(2)/d), followed by 12 maintenance temozolomide cycles (150 to 200 mg/m(2) for 5 days every 28 days) if magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed no enhancement suggesting a tumor; otherwise, chemotherapy was delivered until complete response or unequivocal progression. The first MRI scan was performed 1 month after completing combined chemoradiotherapy.
RESULTS: In 103 patients (mean age, 52 years [range 20 to 73 years]), total resection, subtotal resection, and biopsy were obtained in 51, 51, and 1 cases, respectively. MGMT promoter was methylated in 36 patients (35%) and unmethylated in 67 patients (65%). Lesion enlargement, evidenced at the first MRI scan in 50 of 103 patients, was subsequently classified as psPD in 32 patients and early disease progression in 18 patients. PsPD was recorded in 21 (91%) of 23 methylated MGMT promoter and 11 (41%) of 27 unmethylated MGMT promoter (P = .0002) patients. MGMT status (P = .001) and psPD detection (P = .045) significantly influenced survival.
CONCLUSION: PsPD has a clinical impact on chemotherapy-treated GBM, as it may express the glioma killing effects of treatment and is significantly correlated with MGMT status. Improvement in the early recognition of psPD patterns and knowledge of mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are crucial to eliminating biases in evaluating the results of clinical trials and guaranteeing effective treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18445844     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.8163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  303 in total

Review 1.  [Neurological complications of neurooncological therapy].

Authors:  U Herrlinger; J P Steinbach
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Usefulness of MS-MLPA for detection of MGMT promoter methylation in the evaluation of pseudoprogression in glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Chul-Kee Park; JinWook Kim; Su Youn Yim; Ah Reum Lee; Jung Ho Han; Chae-Yong Kim; Sung-Hye Park; Tae Min Kim; Se-Hoon Lee; Seung Hong Choi; Seung-Ki Kim; Dong Gyu Kim; Hee-Won Jung
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 3.  Treatment-related changes in glioblastoma: a review on the controversies in response assessment criteria and the concepts of true progression, pseudoprogression, pseudoresponse and radionecrosis.

Authors:  P D Delgado-López; E Riñones-Mena; E M Corrales-García
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Codeletions at 1p and 19q predict a lower risk of pseudoprogression in oligodendrogliomas and mixed oligoastrocytomas.

Authors:  Andrew L Lin; Jingxia Liu; John Evans; Eric C Leuthardt; Keith M Rich; Ralph G Dacey; Joshua L Dowling; Albert H Kim; Gregory J Zipfel; Robert L Grubb; Jiayi Huang; Clifford G Robinson; Joseph R Simpson; Gerald P Linette; Michael R Chicoine; David D Tran
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  Paradoxical prognostic impact of TERT promoter mutations in gliomas depends on different histological and genetic backgrounds.

Authors:  Hao You; Yao Wu; Kai Chang; Xiao Shi; Xin-Da Chen; Wei Yan; Rui Li
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2017-09-03       Impact factor: 5.243

6.  Detection of brain tumor cells in the peripheral blood by a telomerase promoter-based assay.

Authors:  Kelly M Macarthur; Gary D Kao; Sanjay Chandrasekaran; Michelle Alonso-Basanta; Christina Chapman; Robert A Lustig; E Paul Wileyto; Stephen M Hahn; Jay F Dorsey
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  EORTC 26083 phase I/II trial of dasatinib in combination with CCNU in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  Enrico Franceschi; Roger Stupp; Martin J van den Bent; Carla van Herpen; Florence Laigle Donadey; Thierry Gorlia; Monika Hegi; Benoit Lhermitte; Lewis C Strauss; Anouk Allgeier; Denis Lacombe; Alba A Brandes
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 8.  Treating recurrent glioblastoma: an update.

Authors:  Carlos Kamiya-Matsuoka; Mark R Gilbert
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2015

9.  Combined iron oxide nanoparticle ferumoxytol and gadolinium contrast enhanced MRI define glioblastoma pseudoprogression.

Authors:  Ramon F Barajas; Bronwyn E Hamilton; Daniel Schwartz; Heather L McConnell; David R Pettersson; Andrea Horvath; Laszlo Szidonya; Csanad G Varallyay; Jenny Firkins; Jerry J Jaboin; Charlotte D Kubicky; Ahmed M Raslan; Aclan Dogan; Justin S Cetas; Jeremy Ciporen; Seunggu J Han; Prakash Ambady; Leslie L Muldoon; Randy Woltjer; William D Rooney; Edward A Neuwelt
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 12.300

10.  Clinical activity and safety of atezolizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  Rimas V Lukas; Jordi Rodon; Kevin Becker; Eric T Wong; Kent Shih; Mehdi Touat; Marcella Fassò; Stuart Osborne; Luciana Molinero; Carol O'Hear; William Grossman; Joachim Baehring
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.