Literature DB >> 26491132

Native Knee Laxities at 0°, 45°, and 90° of Flexion and Their Relationship to the Goal of the Gap-Balancing Alignment Method of Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Joshua D Roth1, Stephen M Howell1, Maury L Hull1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gap-balancing is an alignment method for total knee arthroplasty with the goal of creating uniform tension in the periarticular soft-tissue restraints and equal laxities throughout the arc of flexion. However, there is little evidence that achieving equal laxities prevents either overly tight or overly loose soft-tissue restraints after total knee arthroplasty. Accordingly, the purpose of the present study was to determine whether the laxities at 0°, 45°, and 90° of flexion are equal in the native knee.
METHODS: Seven different laxities were measured at 0°, 45°, and 90° of flexion in ten fresh-frozen native cadaveric knees (with intact menisci, cartilage, and ligaments) by applying loads of ±5 Nm in varus-valgus rotation, ±3 Nm in internal-external rotation, 100 N in distraction, and ±45 N in anterior-posterior translation with use of a six-degrees-of-freedom load application system.
RESULTS: The mean laxities (and standard deviations) at 45° of flexion were 1.7° ± 0.6° greater in varus, 0.9° ± 0.4° greater in valgus, 10.2° ± 2.7° greater in internal rotation, 10.1° ± 2.0° greater in external rotation, 1.7 ± 1.0 mm greater in distraction translation, and 3.3 ± 1.5 mm greater in anterior translation than those at 0° of flexion. The mean laxities at 90° of flexion were 2.5° ± 0.8° greater in varus, 1.0° ± 0.5° greater in valgus, 10.0° ± 4.6° greater in internal rotation, 10.1° ± 4.5° greater in external rotation, 1.8 ± 0.7 mm greater in distraction, and 1.6 ± 1.2 mm greater in anterior translation than those at 0° of flexion. The mean anterior translation at 90° of flexion was 1.7 ± 0.9 mm less than that at 45° of flexion.
CONCLUSIONS: Because five of the seven laxities were at least 1.7° or 1.6 mm greater at both 45° and 90° of flexion than those at 0° of flexion, the laxities of the native knee measured in this study are unequal at these flexion angles and therefore do not support the goal of gap-balancing in total knee arthroplasty. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: One possible disadvantage of changing the native laxities at 45° and 90° of flexion to match those at 0° of flexion in a total knee arthroplasty is the overly tight soft-tissue restraints relative to those of the native knee, which patients may perceive as pain, stiffness, and/or limited flexion.
Copyright © 2015 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26491132     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  28 in total

1.  Is There a Force Target That Predicts Early Patient-reported Outcomes After Kinematically Aligned TKA?

Authors:  Trevor J Shelton; Stephen M Howell; Maury L Hull
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Internal-external malalignment of the femoral component in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty increases tibial force imbalance but does not change laxities of the tibiofemoral joint.

Authors:  Jeremy Riley; Joshua D Roth; Stephen M Howell; Maury L Hull
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The role of ligament tension and sensomotoric system in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Roland Becker; Michael Tobias Hirschmann; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Kinematic alignment more closely restores the groove location and the sulcus angle of the native trochlea than mechanical alignment: implications for prosthetic design.

Authors:  Rocio Lozano; Valentina Campanelli; Stephen Howell; Maury Hull
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty limits high tibial forces, differences in tibial forces between compartments, and abnormal tibial contact kinematics during passive flexion.

Authors:  Joshua D Roth; Stephen M Howell; Maury L Hull
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  [Balancing technique using bone cuts].

Authors:  D Jeremić; R Haaker
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Kinematically aligned TKA restores physiological patellofemoral biomechanics in the sagittal plane during a deep knee bend.

Authors:  Stephanie Nicolet-Petersen; Augustine Saiz; Trevor Shelton; Stephen Howell; Maury L Hull
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  What mechanisms are associated with tibial component failure after kinematically-aligned total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Alexander J Nedopil; Stephen M Howell; Maury L Hull
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  Kinematic alignment is a possible alternative to mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yong Seuk Lee; Stephen M Howell; Ye-Yeon Won; O-Sung Lee; Seung Hoon Lee; Hamed Vahedi; Seow Hui Teo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Increases in tibial force imbalance but not changes in tibiofemoral laxities are caused by varus-valgus malalignment of the femoral component in kinematically aligned TKA.

Authors:  Jeremy Riley; Joshua D Roth; Stephen M Howell; Maury L Hull
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.