Literature DB >> 26487947

Comparison of anal cancer outcomes in public and private hospital patients treated at a single radiation oncology center.

Danielle S Bitterman1, David Grew1, Ping Gu1, Richard F Cohen1, Nicholas J Sanfilippo1, Cynthia G Leichman1, Lawrence P Leichman1, Harvey G Moore1, Heather T Gold1, Kevin L Du1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical and treatment characteristics and outcomes in locally advanced anal cancer, a potentially curable disease, in patients referred from a public or private hospital.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 112 anal cancer patients from a public and a private hospital who received definitive chemoradiotherapy at the same cancer center between 2004 and 2013. Tumor stage, radiotherapy delay, radiotherapy duration, and unplanned treatment breaks ≥10 days were compared using t-test and χ(2) test. Overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), and colostomy free survival (CFS) were examined using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard models for OS and DFS were developed.
RESULTS: The follow-up was 14.9 months (range, 0.7-94.8 months). Public hospital patients presented with significantly higher clinical T stage (P<0.05) and clinical stage group (P<0.05), had significantly longer radiotherapy delays (P<0.05) and radiotherapy duration (P<0.05), and had more frequent radiation therapy (RT) breaks ≥10 days (P<0.05). Three-year OS showed a marked trend in favor of private hospital patients for 3-year OS (72.8% vs. 48.9%; P=0.171), 3-year DFS (66.3% vs. 42.7%, P=0.352), and 3-year CFS (86.4% vs. 68.9%, P=0.299). Referral hospital was not predictive of OS or DFS on multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Public hospital patients presented at later stage and experienced more delays in initiating and completing radiotherapy, which may contribute to the trend in poorer DFS and OS. These findings emphasize the need for identifying clinical and treatment factors that contribute to decreased survival in low socioeconomic status (SES) populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anal cancer; public hospitals; radiotherapy, socioeconomic factors; treatment outcome

Year:  2015        PMID: 26487947      PMCID: PMC4570920          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol        ISSN: 2078-6891


  37 in total

Review 1.  Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: importance in quality of cancer care.

Authors:  B E Hillner; T J Smith; C E Desch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Insurance status and the use of guideline therapy in the treatment of selected cancers.

Authors:  Linda C Harlan; Amanda L Greene; Limin X Clegg; Margaret Mooney; Jennifer L Stevens; Martin L Brown
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  The increasing incidence of anal cancer: can it be explained by trends in risk groups?

Authors:  R P van der Zee; O Richel; H J C de Vries; J M Prins
Journal:  Neth J Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.422

4.  Impact of marital status and race on outcomes of patients enrolled in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group prostate cancer trials.

Authors:  Kevin Lee Du; Kyounghwa Bae; Benjamin Movsas; Yan Yan; Charlene Bryan; Deborah Watkins Bruner
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  [Curative radiotherapy in patients with anal cancer: clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in a single-institution experience].

Authors:  M F Osti; L Agolli; C Scaringi; S Bracci; G Minniti; R Maurizi Enrici
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  The impact of gap duration on local control in anal canal carcinoma treated by split-course radiotherapy and concomitant chemotherapy.

Authors:  D C Weber; J M Kurtz; A S Allal
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Long-term update of US GI intergroup RTOG 98-11 phase III trial for anal carcinoma: survival, relapse, and colostomy failure with concurrent chemoradiation involving fluorouracil/mitomycin versus fluorouracil/cisplatin.

Authors:  Leonard L Gunderson; Kathryn A Winter; Jaffer A Ajani; John E Pedersen; Jennifer Moughan; Al B Benson; Charles R Thomas; Robert J Mayer; Michael G Haddock; Tyvin A Rich; Christopher G Willett
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Evaluation of planned treatment breaks during radiation therapy for anal cancer: update of RTOG 92-08.

Authors:  Andre Konski; Miguel Garcia; Madhu John; Richard Krieg; Wayne Pinover; Robert Myerson; Christopher Willett
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 9.  Cancer disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ward; Ahmedin Jemal; Vilma Cokkinides; Gopal K Singh; Cheryll Cardinez; Asma Ghafoor; Michael Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Chemoradiotherapy with a radiation boost for anal cancer decreases the risk for salvage abdominoperineal resection: analysis from the national cancer data base.

Authors:  Cristina B Geltzeiler; Nima Nabavizadeh; Jong Kim; Kim C Lu; Kevin G Billingsley; Charles R Thomas; Daniel O Herzig; Vassiliki L Tsikitis
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  4 in total

1.  Prognostic factors for patients with anal cancer treated with conformal radiotherapy-a systematic review.

Authors:  Alexandra Gilbert; Ane L Appelt; Stelios Theophanous; Robert Samuel; John Lilley; Ann Henry; David Sebag-Montefiore
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Racial and gender disparities in the incidence of anal cancer: analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS).

Authors:  Alejandro Cruz; Debbie Chen; Paul Hsu; Viraj Pandit; Pamela Omesiete; Priyanka Vij; Valentine Nfonsam
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-02

3.  Socioeconomic disparities in timeliness of care and outcomes for anal cancer patients.

Authors:  Tessnim R Ahmad; Matthew Susko; Karla Lindquist; Mekhail Anwar
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 4.452

4.  Racial disparities in receipt of standard chemoradiation in anal squamous cell carcinoma, an analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Shelly X Bian; Dennis H Chen; Eugene Lin
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 4.452

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.