D C Weber1, J M Kurtz, A S Allal. 1. Radiation Oncology Department of the University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the potential benefit of reducing the intersequence gap in patients with anal cancer treated with split-course chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: The study group consisted of 90 patients with anal squamous carcinoma treated between 1981 and 1998, using concomitant chemotherapy (CT) and radiation (RT). Median age was 65 years (range 41-87). RT was delivered in a split course, with a median gap of 37.5 days (range 4-97) between sequences. First (pelvic) sequence delivered a median dose of 40 Gy (range 36-50.4), using AP/PA megavoltage photon beams. Boost treatment (median dose 20 Gy, range 13-26) consisted of either Iridium-192 implantation (49 patients) or external beam RT (41 patients). CT consisted of 1-2 cycles of a 5-day continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil and bolus mitomycin C, usually administered during the first week of each RT course. Median follow-up was 76.2 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the factors associated with locoregional control (LRC). RESULTS: Five-year actuarial LRC was 72.5%. Factors associated with poorer LRC (univariate) were: age < or = 65, male gender, and gap > 37.5 days. Number of CT cycles (1 vs. 2 or more), boost technique (brachytherapy vs. external), and T-stage were not significantly associated with LRC. In multivariate analysis, only age (p = 0.01), and gap (p = 0.02) retained their significance. In patients older than 65 years, LRC was 92.3% and 75% for shorter and longer gaps, respectively. In younger patients, the corresponding values for LRC were 73.7% and 50%. CONCLUSION: In anal cancers, split-course RT with > 50 Gy dose delivery is difficult to avoid because of acute toxicity. The present analysis suggests that shortening the gap contributes to optimizing LRC. Gaps longer than 5 weeks correlated with poorer LRC, with especially unsatisfactory results observed in younger patients.
PURPOSE: To investigate the potential benefit of reducing the intersequence gap in patients with anal cancer treated with split-course chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: The study group consisted of 90 patients with anal squamous carcinoma treated between 1981 and 1998, using concomitant chemotherapy (CT) and radiation (RT). Median age was 65 years (range 41-87). RT was delivered in a split course, with a median gap of 37.5 days (range 4-97) between sequences. First (pelvic) sequence delivered a median dose of 40 Gy (range 36-50.4), using AP/PA megavoltage photon beams. Boost treatment (median dose 20 Gy, range 13-26) consisted of either Iridium-192 implantation (49 patients) or external beam RT (41 patients). CT consisted of 1-2 cycles of a 5-day continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil and bolus mitomycin C, usually administered during the first week of each RT course. Median follow-up was 76.2 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the factors associated with locoregional control (LRC). RESULTS: Five-year actuarial LRC was 72.5%. Factors associated with poorer LRC (univariate) were: age < or = 65, male gender, and gap > 37.5 days. Number of CT cycles (1 vs. 2 or more), boost technique (brachytherapy vs. external), and T-stage were not significantly associated with LRC. In multivariate analysis, only age (p = 0.01), and gap (p = 0.02) retained their significance. In patients older than 65 years, LRC was 92.3% and 75% for shorter and longer gaps, respectively. In younger patients, the corresponding values for LRC were 73.7% and 50%. CONCLUSION: In anal cancers, split-course RT with > 50 Gy dose delivery is difficult to avoid because of acute toxicity. The present analysis suggests that shortening the gap contributes to optimizing LRC. Gaps longer than 5 weeks correlated with poorer LRC, with especially unsatisfactory results observed in younger patients.
Authors: Danielle S Bitterman; David Grew; Ping Gu; Richard F Cohen; Nicholas J Sanfilippo; Cynthia G Leichman; Lawrence P Leichman; Harvey G Moore; Heather T Gold; Kevin L Du Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2015-10
Authors: Eleonor Rivin Del Campo; Oscar Matzinger; Karin Haustermans; Didier Peiffert; Robert Glynne-Jones; Kathryn A Winter; Andre A Konski; Jaffer A Ajani; Jean-François Bosset; Jean-Michel Hannoun-Levi; Marc Puyraveau; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Helen Meadows; John Northover; Laurence Collette; Melissa Christiaens; Philippe Maingon Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2019-09-28 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Christoph Oehler; Sawyna Provencher; David Donath; Jean-Paul Bahary; Urs M Lütolf; I Frank Ciernik Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2010-05-13 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Karyn A Goodman; Najma Khalid; Lisa A Kachnic; Bruce D Minsky; Cheryl Crozier; Jean B Owen; Phillip M Devlin; Charles R Thomas Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-10-03 Impact factor: 7.038