PURPOSE: On initial publication of GI Intergroup Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 98-11 [A Phase III Randomized Study of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), Mitomycin, and Radiotherapy Versus 5-Fluorouracil, Cisplatin and Radiotherapy in Carcinoma of the Anal Canal], concurrent chemoradiation (CCR) with fluorouracil (FU) plus mitomycin (MMC) decreased colostomy failure (CF) when compared with induction plus concurrent FU plus cisplatin (CDDP), but did not significantly impact disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) for anal canal carcinoma. The intent of the updated analysis was to determine the long-term impact of treatment on survival (DFS, OS, colostomy-free survival [CFS]), CF, and relapse (locoregional failure [LRF], distant metastasis) in this patient group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Stratification factors included sex, clinical node status, and primary size. DFS and OS were estimated univariately by the Kaplan-Meier method, and treatment arms were compared by log-rank test. Time to relapse and CF were estimated by the cumulative incidence method and treatment arms were compared by using Gray's test. Multivariate analyses used Cox proportional hazard models to test for treatment differences after adjusting for stratification factors. RESULTS: Of 682 patients accrued, 649 were analyzable for outcomes. DFS and OS were statistically better for RT + FU/MMC versus RT + FU/CDDP (5-year DFS, 67.8% v 57.8%; P = .006; 5-year OS, 78.3% v 70.7%; P = .026). There was a trend toward statistical significance for CFS (P = .05), LRF (P = .087), and CF (P = .074). Multivariate analysis was statistically significant for treatment and clinical node status for both DFS and OS, for tumor diameter for DFS, and for sex for OS. CONCLUSION:CCR with FU/MMC has a statistically significant, clinically meaningful impact on DFS and OS versus induction plus concurrent FU/CDDP, and it has borderline significance for CFS, CF, and LRF. Therefore, RT + FU/MMC remains the preferred standard of care.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: On initial publication of GI Intergroup Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 98-11 [A Phase III Randomized Study of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), Mitomycin, and Radiotherapy Versus 5-Fluorouracil, Cisplatin and Radiotherapy in Carcinoma of the Anal Canal], concurrent chemoradiation (CCR) with fluorouracil (FU) plus mitomycin (MMC) decreased colostomy failure (CF) when compared with induction plus concurrent FU plus cisplatin (CDDP), but did not significantly impact disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) for anal canal carcinoma. The intent of the updated analysis was to determine the long-term impact of treatment on survival (DFS, OS, colostomy-free survival [CFS]), CF, and relapse (locoregional failure [LRF], distant metastasis) in this patient group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Stratification factors included sex, clinical node status, and primary size. DFS and OS were estimated univariately by the Kaplan-Meier method, and treatment arms were compared by log-rank test. Time to relapse and CF were estimated by the cumulative incidence method and treatment arms were compared by using Gray's test. Multivariate analyses used Cox proportional hazard models to test for treatment differences after adjusting for stratification factors. RESULTS: Of 682 patients accrued, 649 were analyzable for outcomes. DFS and OS were statistically better for RT + FU/MMC versus RT + FU/CDDP (5-year DFS, 67.8% v 57.8%; P = .006; 5-year OS, 78.3% v 70.7%; P = .026). There was a trend toward statistical significance for CFS (P = .05), LRF (P = .087), and CF (P = .074). Multivariate analysis was statistically significant for treatment and clinical node status for both DFS and OS, for tumor diameter for DFS, and for sex for OS. CONCLUSION: CCR with FU/MMC has a statistically significant, clinically meaningful impact on DFS and OS versus induction plus concurrent FU/CDDP, and it has borderline significance for CFS, CF, and LRF. Therefore, RT + FU/MMC remains the preferred standard of care.
Authors: M Flam; M John; T F Pajak; N Petrelli; R Myerson; S Doggett; J Quivey; M Rotman; H Kerman; L Coia; K Murray Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1996-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: B Sischy; R L Doggett; J M Krall; D G Taylor; W T Sause; J A Lipsett; H G Seydel Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1989-06-07 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Leonard L Gunderson; Jennifer Moughan; Jaffer A Ajani; John E Pedersen; Kathryn A Winter; Al B Benson; Charles R Thomas; Robert J Mayer; Michael G Haddock; Tyvin A Rich; Christopher G Willett Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2013-09-10 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Danielle S Bitterman; David Grew; Ping Gu; Richard F Cohen; Nicholas J Sanfilippo; Cynthia G Leichman; Lawrence P Leichman; Harvey G Moore; Heather T Gold; Kevin L Du Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2015-10
Authors: Paolo Goffredo; Alan F Utria; Jennifer E Hrabe; Irena Gribovskaja-Rupp; Muneera R Kapadia; Imran Hassan Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2019-01-14 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Shouki N Bazarbashi; Ali M Alzahrani; Mohammed M Rahal; Ahmed S Al-Shehri; Ali H Aljubran; Nasser A Alsanea; Omar A Al-Obeed; Magdy S Kandil; Jamal E Zekri; Ashwaq A Al Olayan; Abdullah A Alsharm; Khaled S Balaraj Journal: Saudi Med J Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 1.484