Literature DB >> 26486933

Central amygdala lesions inhibit pontine nuclei acoustic reactivity and retard delay eyeblink conditioning acquisition in adult rats.

Joseph M Pochiro1, Derick H Lindquist2,3.   

Abstract

In delay eyeblink conditioning (EBC) a neutral conditioned stimulus (CS; tone) is repeatedly paired with a mildly aversive unconditioned stimulus (US; periorbital electrical shock). Over training, subjects learn to produce an anticipatory eyeblink conditioned response (CR) during the CS, prior to US onset. While cerebellar synaptic plasticity is necessary for successful EBC, the amygdala is proposed to enhance eyeblink CR acquisition. In the current study, adult Long-Evans rats received bilateral sham or neurotoxic lesions of the central nucleus of the amygdala (CEA) followed by 1 or 4 EBC sessions. Fear-evoked freezing behavior, CS-mediated enhancement of the unconditioned response (UR), and eyeblink CR acquisition were all impaired in the CEA lesion rats relative to sham controls. There were also significantly fewer c-Fos immunoreactive cells in the pontine nuclei (PN)-major relays of acoustic information to the cerebellum-following the first and fourth EBC session in lesion rats. In sham rats, freezing behavior decreased from session 1 to 4, commensurate with nucleus-specific reductions in amygdala Fos+ cell counts. Results suggest delay EBC proceeds through three stages: in stage one the amygdala rapidly excites diffuse fear responses and PN acoustic reactivity, facilitating cerebellar synaptic plasticity and the development of eyeblink CRs in stage two, leading, in stage three, to a diminution or stabilization of conditioned fear responding.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amygdala; Cerebellum; Eyeblink conditioning; Fear conditioning; Pavlovian conditioning

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26486933     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-015-0199-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  68 in total

Review 1.  Neural substrates of eyeblink conditioning: acquisition and retention.

Authors:  Kimberly M Christian; Richard F Thompson
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Focal projections of cat auditory cortex to the pontine nuclei.

Authors:  Mercedes Perales; Jeffery A Winer; Jorge J Prieto
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2006-08-20       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  Neuronal substrate of classical conditioning in the hippocampus.

Authors:  T W Berger; B Alger; R F Thompson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-04-30       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Coming to terms with fear.

Authors:  Joseph E LeDoux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Biphasic modulation of hippocampal plasticity by behavioral stress and basolateral amygdala stimulation in the rat.

Authors:  I Akirav; G Richter-Levin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Cerebellar cortex lesions disrupt learning-dependent timing of conditioned eyelid responses.

Authors:  S P Perrett; B P Ruiz; M D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Multiple unit activity recorded from amygdala central nucleus during Pavlovian heart rate conditioning in rabbit.

Authors:  C D Applegate; R C Frysinger; B S Kapp; M Gallagher
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1982-04-29       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 8.  Neural circuitry and plasticity mechanisms underlying delay eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  John H Freeman; Adam B Steinmetz
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 9.  The neuroscience of mammalian associative learning.

Authors:  Michael S Fanselow; Andrew M Poulos
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 10.  The role of the cerebellum in classical conditioning of discrete behavioral responses.

Authors:  R F Thompson; J E Steinmetz
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 3.590

View more
  4 in total

1.  Amygdala central nucleus modulation of cerebellar learning with a visual conditioned stimulus.

Authors:  Sean J Farley; Heba Albazboz; Benjamin J De Corte; Jason J Radley; John H Freeman
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 2.877

2.  Inactivation of the interpositus nucleus blocks the acquisition of conditioned responses and timing changes in conditioning-specific reflex modification of the rabbit eyeblink response.

Authors:  Lauren B Burhans; Bernard G Schreurs
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 2.877

3.  Amygdala central nucleus modulation of cerebellar learning in female rats.

Authors:  John H Freeman; Sean J Farley; Samantha R Pierson
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.154

4.  Memory consolidation within the central amygdala is not necessary for modulation of cerebellar learning.

Authors:  Adam B Steinmetz; Ka H Ng; John H Freeman
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.460

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.