Literature DB >> 19409234

The role of the cerebellum in classical conditioning of discrete behavioral responses.

R F Thompson1, J E Steinmetz.   

Abstract

The cerebellum and its associated circuitry constitutes the entire essential neuronal system for classical conditioning of eye-blink and other discrete responses (e.g. limb flexion) learned with an aversive unconditioned stimulus (US) using the standard delay paradigm where the conditioned stimulus (CS) and the US coterminate. Evidence reviewed here strongly supports the following conclusions. The CS pathway involves sensory relay nuclei projections to the pontine nuclei and its mossy fiber projections to the cerebellar cortex and nuclei. The US pathway involves activation of the inferior olive (dorsal accessory olive for eye blink) and its climbing fiber projections to the cerebellar cortex and nuclei. The conditioned response (CR) pathway involves the cerebellar interpositus nucleus, the superior cerebellar peduncle pathway to the magnocellular red nucleus and rubral projections to premotor and motor nuclei generating the behavioral response. Anatomical data, neuronal unit recordings, electrical stimulation, lesions and methods of reversible inactivation all strongly support the hypothesis that the essential memory trace for the learning of these discrete conditioned responses is formed and stored in the cerebellar interpositus nucleus. Neuronal/synaptic plasticity is also established in the cerebellar cortex in this form of learning but the role of the cortex is less clear. We argue that the cortex plays a key role in normal acquisition and adaptive timing of the conditioned response, under certain circumstances, but it remains unclear exactly what features of conditioning are being encoded in the cerebellar cortex in this basic form of associative learning and memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19409234     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.01.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  108 in total

1.  Differential acetylcholine release in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus during pavlovian trace and delay conditioning.

Authors:  M Melissa Flesher; Allen E Butt; Brandee L Kinney-Hurd
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 2.  Exploring prefrontal cortical memory mechanisms with eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Craig Weiss; John F Disterhoft
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Multiple sites of extinction for a single learned response.

Authors:  Brian E Kalmbach; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Compensation in the neural circuitry of fear conditioning awakens learning circuits in the bed nuclei of the stria terminalis.

Authors:  Andrew M Poulos; Ravikumar Ponnusamy; Hong-Wei Dong; Michael S Fanselow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Temporal patterns of inputs to cerebellum necessary and sufficient for trace eyelid conditioning.

Authors:  Brian E Kalmbach; Tatsuya Ohyama; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Motor Learning and the Cerebellum.

Authors:  Chris I De Zeeuw; Michiel M Ten Brinke
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 10.005

7.  Developmental changes in medial auditory thalamic contributions to associative motor learning.

Authors:  Ka H Ng; John H Freeman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Conditioned inhibition in a rodent model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  John T Green; Amy C Chess; Cynthia J Conquest; Brittney A Yegla
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Chemotherapy disrupts learning, neurogenesis and theta activity in the adult brain.

Authors:  Miriam S Nokia; Megan L Anderson; Tracey J Shors
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 10.  A hypothetical universal model of cerebellar function: reconsideration of the current dogma.

Authors:  Ari Magal
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.