Literature DB >> 26481817

Pitfalls in the Use of Stereoacuity in the Diagnosis of Nonorganic Visual Loss.

Kevin R Sitko1, Jason H Peragallo2, Samuel Bidot1, Valerie Biousse3, Nancy J Newman4, Beau B Bruce5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Titmus Stereotest (Stereo Optical Co., Inc., Chicago, IL) has been used to estimate visual acuity (VA) in the evaluation of nonorganic visual loss. Previous predictions were derived from optical degradation of VA in normal subjects and may not account for the variability seen in patients with neuro-ophthalmic pathologies included in the differential diagnosis of nonorganic visual loss. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between Titmus stereoacuity and minimal VA based on a real-world testing environment.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. PARTICIPANTS: All patients treated at the authors' neuro-ophthalmology service between April 25, 2014, and July 31, 2014.
METHODS: All subjects underwent routine neuro-ophthalmic examination, including Titmus stereoacuity measurements. A compound Bayesian logit-lognormal model accounting for heteroscedasticity was used to determine 95% and 99% prediction intervals of the worse eye's near VA based on stereoacuity. Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution VA and log stereoacuity were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Titmus stereoacuity and worse eye VA.
RESULTS: Of 561 patients, 364 subjects 11 to 91 years of age were included. Titmus stereoacuity was associated positively with VA: 9 circles correct (40 seconds of arc) indicated VA of at least 20/40 with 95% confidence and VA of at least 20/79 with 99% confidence; 6 circles correct (80 seconds of arc) indicated VA of at least 20/62 and 20/180, respectively; and 4 circles correct (140 seconds of arc) indicated VA of at least 20/110 and 20/570, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: When fully accounting for individual variation and the full spectrum of neuro-ophthalmic diseases affecting VA, stereoacuity remains associated with VA, but previous commonly used VA estimates based on stereoacuity overestimated VA. Our results more accurately predict minimum VA from Titmus stereoacuity and should be used preferentially when evaluating patients with suspected nonorganic visual loss. We demonstrated that Titmus stereoacuity cannot definitively establish normal VA, and therefore can suggest, but not fully establish, the diagnosis of nonorganic visual loss.
Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26481817      PMCID: PMC4695302          DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.09.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  9 in total

1.  Stereoscopic Acuity for Various Levels of Illumination.

Authors:  C G Mueller; V V Lloyd
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1948-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Quantitative relations among vernier, real depth, and stereoscopic depth acuities.

Authors:  R N BERRY
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1948-12

3.  Effect of luminance and contrast on stereoscopic acuity.

Authors:  T Geib; C Baumann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Contrast and duration of exposure differentially affect vernier and stereoscopic acuity.

Authors:  G Westheimer; M W Pettet
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1990-07-23       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Stereoscopic perception and Snellen visual acuity.

Authors:  N S Levy; E B Glick
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Blurred visual stimuli. II. The effect of blurred visual stimuli on vernier and stereo acuity.

Authors:  G Stigmar
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1971

7.  Effect of binocular variations of Snellen's visual acuity on Titmus stereoacuity.

Authors:  P B Donzis; J A Rappazzo; R M Burde; M Gordon
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-06

8.  Optokinetic nystagmus as a measure of visual function in severely visually impaired patients.

Authors:  Sara T Wester; Joseph F Rizzo; M David Balkwill; Conrad Wall
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  The monocular vertical prism dissociation test.

Authors:  Karl C Golnik; Andrew G Lee; Eric R Eggenberger
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.258

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Correlation between Stereopsis and Reverse Stereopsis.

Authors:  Michael Dattilo; Caroline Vasseneix; Beau B Bruce; Kevin R Sitko; Valerie Biousse; Nancy J Newman; Jason H Peragallo
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Binocular cross-correlation analyses of the effects of high-order aberrations on the stereoacuity of eyes with keratoconus.

Authors:  Sangeetha Metlapally; Shrikant R Bharadwaj; Austin Roorda; Vinay Kumar Nilagiri; Tiffanie T Yu; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Non-organic Vision Loss in the Afghanistan and Iraq Conflicts.

Authors:  Kevin M Broderick; Thomas B Ableman; Eric D Weber; Robert W Enzenauer; Harold J Wain; Keith J Wroblewski
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2017-03-30

4.  Altered visual functions, macular ganglion cell and papillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in early-treated adult PKU patients.

Authors:  Csilla Serfozo; Andras Gellert Barta; Endre Horvath; Csaba Sumanszki; Bela Csakany; Miklos Resch; Zoltan Zsolt Nagy; Peter Reismann
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab Rep       Date:  2020-09-22

5.  Reduced macular thickness and macular vessel density in early-treated adult patients with PKU.

Authors:  Csilla Serfozo; Andras Gellert Barta; Endre Horvath; Csaba Sumanszki; Bela Csakany; Miklos Resch; Zoltan Zsolt Nagy; Peter Reismann
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab Rep       Date:  2021-05-05

Review 6.  Functional vision disorders in adults: a paradigm and nomenclature shift for ophthalmology.

Authors:  Subahari Raviskanthan; Sydney Wendt; Peter M Ugoh; Peter W Mortensen; Heather E Moss; Andrew G Lee
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 6.197

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.